Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Doineann (2021)
5/10
A familiar premise, well acted
24 June 2024
Warning: Spoilers
"He asked me if I was alright. It had been a long time since anyone had asked me that."

I believe this is the first time I've watched a movie where the characters primarily spoke Irish. I can't really comment on their diction or accents since I don't speak Irish or have expertise in it, but I found it very pleasant to listen to. I've always liked the Irish accent and the language itself.

The plot followed a familiar premise, so it's easy for the viewer to predict its direction. This wasn't due to a lack of skill from the cast, who maintained high tension in their interactions, or from the passionate direction in terms of framing and choreography. Rather, it's because we've seen many movies in this genre, making it harder to be surprised by the plot twists.

Regarding the kitchen scene, you might think of its choreography as a writing mistake.

''Why didn't that character use the baby as leverage to make the other character come out of the bathroom?'' you might ask.

Well, that character had heard the call and knew the baby wouldn't be harmed. They were the ones in danger. Sure, the bad guy could have pretended to hurt the baby, but the situation would have stalled and broken the scene's momentum since the character locked in the bathroom knew the other character had been ordered not to hurt the baby. Plus, everything happened quickly, and as soon as the bad guy turned his back again... well, you know what happened. Remember that this is a movie, not real life, so sometimes, to keep things going, you have to believe what they're showing/telling you.

That being said, I very much enjoyed the finale. ❤

*** ''Some men aren't fit to be fathers.''
  • You didn't turn out too bad.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Warrior (2011)
8/10
"He's not your brother, right? He's in the way."
23 June 2024
"You do that to someone on the streets, they lock you up and throw away the key."

"You don't knock him out, you don't have a home."

The oldest plot in the book, yet they made it look anything but boring. It was a tense narrative all the way through. I was sweating and crying and cheering the whole time. Man, what a roller coaster of a movie. The scenes were all balanced, though.

This is such a "man movie", and, although I mean it in a stereotypical way, I also mean it in a good way. It's already a classic. 140 minutes and you don't feel them. Brilliant cast, brilliant performances, the writing ate. The score helps the scenes quite a lot, and each character has a presence here. If any of them had been absent, you would have noticed that the movie was ''missing something''. I have no idea how this movie didn't get a couple more ''important'' nominations, at least. Most of the fight scenes were almost perfect, they did the best they could in coordinating them.

"He's not your brother, right? He's in the way."
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
WAKE HIM UP!
23 June 2024
"Wake him up!"

Yea, there's a clear essence of Expressionism in this film. It's easy to see why "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920)" is hailed as the "first expressionist film." Imho, it also resonates with Romantic themes and incorporates imagery from mythology and literature.

Still, don't get me wrong (lol), you can absolutely safely say that the film resonates with Expressionism way more than anything else.

The distorted visual style, the sets, and the psychological themes that deal with the interior human condition all scream: "German Expressionism!"

The psychological horrors the unreliable narrator depicted to us, illustrate how individuals can become ideal puppets in the hands of powerful delirant figures who seek to play God while also being "played" by their own minds. To the point where both victim and perpetrator alike can commit "acts that (in a walking stage) they would never commit". A testimony or the result of madness? Whose version do we want to believe?

Surely, these concepts are still an open debate in our modern society, stirring up ugly and uncomfortable feelings, because of their traumatic and moral nature.

The dual obsession driving Caligari's and Francis' actions in the false(?)(who knows, that's up to you to decide) memories symbolizes, to me, the extremes to which compulsive behavior, whether for good or ill, can lead.

Just my two cents, contemplating the intriguing interplay this film seems to engage in (perhaps even unconsciously?-though I have my doubts) between Expressionism and the remnants of Romanticism during that era and the enduring influence that myths and literature in general exert on us and our creative processes and contemplation of the world, even today.

Why literature? Idk, I just can't help but sense echoes of Goethe's "Faust" in the mix.

The fact it was divided into 6 acts tells me something, too, I guess. Or, maybe, I'm just reaching.

One particular scene that struck a chord with me, evoking the mythological aspect within the film's visuals, is the moment when Cesare abducts Jane. It resonated with the imagery of Gian Lorenzo Bernini's sculpture "The Rape of Proserpina." Even though that scene didn't follow what happened in the myth, the frame still had the same effect on me, you know? Especially considering what Francis tells Jane in the last act. It made me think that maybe a part of Francis, the sicker one, was identifying with Cesare during those "flashbacks" or his made up fantasy.

Idk if that scene is actually inspired by something else or what. This is just what the scene reminded me of.

Unfortunately, here on imdb I can't link you the comparison image, so you'll have to look it up for yourself. :( </3.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Power couple, if you ask me
23 June 2024
Warning: Spoilers
"They kept saying: 'Time heals all wounds.' But that's a lie: time is the wound. Takes you further and further from that place where you were happy."

Power couple, if you ask me. 😂✨

Doesn't it also thrill you being both bi & traumatized? I feel like this will be my new favorite movie for a while.

And how I appreciated all the little references to silent films, you have no idea. I wish I knew Lisa in person (semicit. From the movie).

The pace is so smooth that it ends before you notice it, which is a shame, imo. I wanted it to last waaay longer and never end ("that's what she said"). This movie would translate so well into a TV show, like, why is no one mentioning it? 🤧

The witty, spontaneous, genuine and educated writing is the best thing about "Lisa Frankenstein (2024)". It felt authentic with this movie's genre and goal. From the characters, to the scenes and every little detail about it. The cast was clearly stimulated by the atmosphere on set and the directing; you can tell from the way everyone handled their character.

Was the plot twist predictable? Well, yes, but that just comes with the territory. You seriously want to make me believe you watched this movie expecting it to be some mind-blowing masterpiece? If that's the case, then that's on you. Sorry, I promise I say it without malice. You know, I'm actually an IP, Intuitive Person (another semicit. From the movie) 😂💔

The general '80s aesthetic and vibes from vintage movies and real-life from those years, mixed with today's pop references, are probably the second-best thing about this movie. They nailed it, it doesn't look choppy or sloppy. Together with the costumes, textures, makeup and hairstyles and everything else that contributes to the visual aspect of a movie.

I found the cinematography to be inspired at times, especially when it mattered the most, while "by the book" most of the time. It had some nice and interesting shots, though, and the quality of the editing was consistent. It can come across as amateuristic in a couple of instances, but I strongly believe that it was done on purpose and I would invite you to consider the same thought. Remember the genres at hand. You get that feeling, right? That the rough camera work was intentional. I believe it worked masterfully to serve a certain look of reminiscence to the audience. 🙌🏻😊

The soundtrack enveloped every scene perfectly.

The truth is, this movie works just fine the way it is, with its ending and everything, but I also genuinely hope that they'll make more installments. 🤞🏻

P. S. This is one of Cole Sprouse's best looks. He totally looks like someone from the 1800s.

To be fair, the casting for every character was spot-on.

P. P. S. (that's also kind of a spoiler) As I see it, the viewer is supposed to think that Lisa (Kathryn Newton), off-screen, taught The Creature (Cole Sprouse) how to drive, somewhat decently enough, or that he watched her drive and copied her moves when he needed to drive a car by himself. If you do not agree with this interpretation, then I can understand that you would think of that aspect of the movie as a plot hole; considering there were other continuity mistakes as well, especially towards the end.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Past Lives (2023)
8/10
This female director is promising
23 June 2024
Warning: Spoilers
"There is a word in Korean.

In-Yun.

It means "providence". Or "fate". But it's specifically about relationships between people. I think it comes from Buddhism. And reincarnation. It's an "In-Yun" if two strangers even walk by each other in the street, and their clothes accidentally brush. Because it means there must have been something between them in their past lives. If two people get married, they say it's because there have been eight thousand layers of In-Yun. Over eight thousand lifetimes."

Oscars 2024 Watchlist 7/22

You know it's a Korean movie when there's the childhood-friends plot device. 😂

The dialogue, atmosphere, color grading, locations and writing also feel pretty truthful to your regular K-movie. It seems that Celine Song drew a lot of inspiration from her Korean heritage and Korean Cinema history and cultural influences. So, that's already a plus for me. This director is promising, and I can't wait to watch more of her work in the future. However, I believe that this movie was a little bit overhyped by the public (partially due to the same factors that led "Parasite (2019)" to be overhyped, just like any other non-American production, especially if Asian). To enjoy this movie to the fullest, though, you should know a bit about Korean history and culture, otherwise, some of the dialogue and references might confuse you or make you think that they hold no meaning, or even make you consider them "silly" or "cringe".

This year, it will be difficult to choose a favorite "original screenplay", me thinks...

Anyway, I'm surprised it didn't at least get nominated for "Best Cinematography" for its nostalgic reminiscing feeling and "Best Director" or "Best Film Editing".

Their first video call and everything that happened during the bar scene are my favorite moments.

For the people who didn't like this movie: it's probably because you aren't that used to Korean storytelling, its pace. This movie is pretty standard for a Korean/South Asian movie, I would say. Maybe this just wasn't your cup of tea, I'm sorry. 💔

The acting isn't the one you'd find in a typical K-drama, but it suits the movie's plot and setting.

You can clearly tell that the Korean spoken by the actress Greta Lee, who plays adult-Nora, isn't the greatest-as well as her strong English accent that comes out when she speaks in Korean-but that totally makes sense for her character, since she and her family moved to Canada when she was still a kid (we see that adult-Nora struggles with written Korean too). I hope that irl no one made fun of the actress or tried to shame her for this... 💔 ***

"It doesn't make sense... I'm not sure if I can say something like this."
  • What do you want to say?


*long pause* "I missed you."
  • Me too.


***

The adult actors (Grata Lee for adult-Nora and Teo Yoo for adult-Hae Sung) have great chemistry together. It's probably the best thing about "Past Lives (2023)". The yearning, melancholy, and affection in Hae Sung's eyes, especially after they finally met in person... my heart broke.

Even if we haven't seen much of them, the two young actors who play the young versions of Na Young (Seung Ah Moon) and Hae Sung (Seung Min Yim) were good too!

SPOILER:

"I didn't know that liking your husband would hurt this much."

Truth be told, people, I so freaking hoped for the throuple to happen till the last second, I swear; even if what Arthur and Hae Sung told each other was just a joke to lighten up the mood and get rid of the awkwardness and that that discussion between Nora and Arthur came from a place of insecurity. I genuinely think that if all three of them had chosen to talk about the whole situation together, they could have come up with a solution that would have made everyone involved happy. 😬 In my mind it would have worked, so now it's canon to me, idc, lol. I don't even need a sequel. The sequel is already in my mind. 🙌🏻😂

That being said, wishful thinking aside, the ending needed to be the one we saw here. It made sense, considering their situation.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lamb (II) (2022)
7/10
"You take the lamb, and she'll always follow."
23 June 2024
"You take the lamb, and she'll always follow."

I lost count of how many times I whispered "J*sus Christ..." while watching this. It's so unsettling because it feels and looks so real. To some degree, a situation like this has happened to all of us at least once in our lives-but especially if you're a woman. Let's stop beating around the bush: every woman has met a "Paul" in her life. That's a sad truth, but the truth nonetheless.

Fifteen minutes flow in seconds, at times too quickly (if you ask me), and the cinematography is almost blinding with its honest capturing of opposite forces forcedly existing in the same confined space. Together with the actors' performances, especially Éanna Hardwicke's one, the atmosphere becomes anxiety-inducing from the very start. The dark, invasive aura that entered Sarah's home a stark contrast with the "gorgeous day outside". This way, the viewer experiences constant and increasing maddening discomfort through Sarah's own discomfort with the situation she and her child are in. Personally, the ending was the perfect one for my taste.

And about Éanna Hardwicke, man... How does he nail his part in every single performance? I'm so happy I was able to see him in this short film too.

A round of applause to the crew, the actors (Aoife Duffin as Sarah and Éanna Hardwicke as Paul) and Sinéad O'Loughlin for writing and directing it! 👏🏻❤

"I didn't break in here, okay? Your door was open!"
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
IF (2024)
6/10
Simple yet solid and effective movie
23 June 2024
C. S. Lewis once said: "Some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again."

It's a simple yet solid and effective movie. It focuses on the relationship between a father (or father figure) and his child, but from the child's POV. It briefly mentions a more conflictual relationship with one own parent figure; it didn't give too many hints about that, I hope they will in future sequels(?)

It draws inspiration from Disney and Pixar films, both in terms of story and design, and reimagines those elements in a way that's equally engaging, rather than a lazy copy-paste.

The charm of this movie is that it appeals to more than just children. In this aspect, it reminded me of some classic Disney and Pixar films, as well as those from DreamWorks.

''Rise of the Guardians," "Monsters Inc.," "Winnie the Pooh," "Toy Story," "Inside Out," and now "IF" all share a similar DNA but offer their own twists.

Lewis (voiced by Louis Gossett Jr.) struck me as a grown-up, reimagined version of Pooh from "Winnie the Pooh." This was a nice touch, likely a nod for those of us who grew up with that animated classic.

The VFXs were my favorite part. They were very creative, at times making the film feel more like an animated movie than live action, which I'm sure will captivate kids and immerse them even more in the story and its characters.

The movie blended its elements well, likely because the creators had a clear vision of their target audience and aimed to create something that would age gracefully.

Another great thing about "IF" is that it would make an excellent musical. I hope they consider this possibility.

Every time I see Ryan Reynolds acting alongside a child, it feels like he's interacting with his own kid. He's one of the few actors who seems to naturally connect with and work well with young actors, making their dynamic believable.

Cailey Fleming also delivered an outstanding performance. She's definitely going places. Her acting was consistently impressive throughout the movie.

The actors who voiced all the IFs did a fantastic job. I hope we get a couple of sequels and the chance to spend more time with the other IFs. On that note, my only real ''complaint'' is that we didn't spend enough time with them. I understand the movie couldn't be too long, but those characters deserved more screen time.

Even so, they were developed well enough that I'm sure kids already have their favorite IF.

P. S.

My eyes did water during the ending.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed