IntermusicM

Brilliant show. Impelling viewing. Shame about those dreadful judges.

What qualifies these awful "judges" to criticise an artist's work?

What qualifies them to choose the best.

Surely a painting is judged by the general viewer. The sitter has chosen which they would hang on their wall, as we all subconsciously do.

Also we judge it's worth by what we would be prepared to pay for it.

Not by some up-themselves so called "experts" who are with artists like the competitors or gallery owners.

They would no doubt choose the banana gaffer taped to the wall or the unmade bed!! They obviously wouldn't know good art if it fell on them.

This could be a good programme but unfortunately just succeeds in being cringe worthy.

The commentator makes an in growing toenail sound life threatening.

The endings always show the intended tear jerking conclusions to each case. Oh my god the patient didn't have his leg amputated because of the toenail. The broken leg didn't result in permanent brain damage.

It's not dramatic it's just "pass the sick bucket, for the viewer".

And the relatives stories are also fingers down throat sick making. All these perfect people in perfect relationships. Where does the programme maker find them all? And all the way through, the commentator continues his whiny doom mongering.

Plenty of better medical reality shows out there guys. Give this one a miss.

Badly "acted" I would have expected better from Faye Ripley.

The Irish police officer is appalling and shows the police to be insensitive bullies, which they're not. Police officers are taught to show sensitivity towards bereaved relatives.

In practically every episode the 2 officers carry out illegal searches, often barging into homes without a warrant and rooting through private possessions. If they have a warrant ie for a mobile, they're rooting through photographs! Do they not know that items seized during an unlawful search are inadmissible in court?

I found myself watching out of morbid interest.