FireJach

Before it hit homes, I'd heard how beautiful and magical the movie is, or how Dreamworks has made another classic. I was so excited after reading all of these opinions, I prepared myself and bought chips and beer. Well, shortly after 30 minutes I realized the movie goes to nowhere.

It's another movie about teamwork, respect, tolerance - I've watched dozens of them in my entire life and here I got nothing new.

The movie begins super slowly and doesn't build up anything quite deeper besides one actually cool thing - realistic nature where animals eat each other. The movie is not long so I feel they wasted lots of time on telling/showing us how the robot is designed to serve people. At some point the robots adopts a bird and with help of the fox, they're trying to raise the bird, which is sometimes rushed. The moment when the bird needs to migrate like the rest of his kind, I didn't feel anything because the movie didn't build up any emotional connection. The story here is super cliche and flat. Well, [It's another movie about teamwork, respect, tolerance - I've watched dozens of them in my entire life and here I got nothing new], an average comedy movie made 15 years ago delivers the same message, which makes EVERYTHING predictable.

There are some major problems I dislike such as:

• Why didn't the company send another aircraft after the failed one? They waited for another signal despite the story shows us how important the robot was for them. The robot had time to spend more time with the nature therefore you can see how the time pasts.

• Maybe I missed it, but I thought the central part (the core) is the most important part of the robot to be "alive". Minor spoiler! The robots throws it away to save its bird and then everything it's alright for a long time.

• I hate it, I HATE IT, how the story ESTABLISHED the nature is realistic but at some point they say: You know, you can change. No, the animals can't stop eating each other. Dreamworks showed the animals are realistic here and it's a part of this story that they need to adapt, obey to the nature. It's not The Lion King where that part is ignored. You can't say it is analogy to a real life issues while the thing is a basic need of the characters. Some people might compare it to anger, toxic responses etc. But we as humans can live without these, so that is BIG MINUS.

The movie is alright, watch it with your kids. I think Puss in Boots 2 has deeper meaning, more creative story, more engaging characters, more emotional - better.

A director of latest MCU Spider-Man movies delivers a fun comedy with two well-known movie stars. I am surprised it is not scheduled for December because Wolfs takes place during the holidays in New York City, so I think it's the best time to watch such a movie at the end of year.

I think the story is pretty good because it's simple and makes the characters likable. Both are typical cold alpha males who don't like each other and trying to do anything solo, what leads to comedic scenes. Their classic charm is never getting old, but I love how Jon Watts (the director) acknowledges their age. The kid is a light star of the movie, he isn't overshadowed by the duo.

If you like oldschool movies full of that man energy, I think you are gonna like it as I do.

I think people are trying to treat it differently to not make themselves ignorant or whatever.

The entire episode gives absolutely nothing. You can skip it. Let me tell you why.

Episode 1 of season 3 wastes your time. It's not driven by story, it's not driven by art, it's not driven by anything except the things you know from the previous episodes. You know how Carman feels, you know his history, you know what has been through. You also know the creators of the show love to edit it in a fancy dynamic way to present some beautiful dishes. So my question is: Why the hell somebody thought it's a good idea to give us such a repetitive and pointless episode??? After this I don't know if I want to start episode 2.