Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Takes courage to make a piece of junk like this...
2 December 2004
I chose to watch this movie solely because it didn't have enough votes for a proper rating and that it was very short (82 min).

An hour into the movie, it still had nothing as of scriptwriting, directing, cinematography etc. It was an original idea, but that was it.

At the 68th minute, you find out who it is. And it's a sleezball guy who can't even play psycho. (There was bad bad bad acting all over the movie, like when the old lady says, "what are you doing? you can't take my car?")

It had one of the funniest climaxes of all. Very lazy scriptwriting. As I said, a good idea, but nothing, nothing more at all.

This film is cinema garbage. And what a waste of film stock.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Belle de Jour (1967)
8/10
Sadly disappointing
30 December 2002
Warning: Spoilers
For a film to be at least "good", it should be acted well, don't you think? This may well be Catherine Deneuve's worst performance ever. When I saw her drop the vase at the beginning of the film, I thought she had mock-dropped it to tease the maid. But it turned out that she was actually trying to act dizzy. And the death of Pierre Clementi (Marcel)?!? Laughable! Laurel & Hardy used to fall down like that to amuse their audience. Sheer disappointment!
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Happiness (1998)
8/10
THIS IS THE REAL "magnolia"
24 December 2002
Ask, Philip Seymour Hoffman, he will tell you the same thing. That "magnolia" was just a ripoff. Also watch "Welcome to the Dollhouse" and especially the brilliant "STORYTELLING". You will adore Todd Solondz' work. He's the most exciting new director in the States. (along with Sam Mendes, but he's British, not surprisingly!)
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed