Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings25
MC1-1's rating
Reviews13
MC1-1's rating
This is the kind of documentary you'd dismiss if it wasn't for the fact that they've documented everything so well.
Original video, original documents, original photos, original interviews and original studies.
If it's there in writing or on video it's really hard not to give it a lot of credibility.
It's also a good explanation of how laetrile works. Too few people understand the science... and so it tends to be misrepresented. They also refer back to the original studies... the ones some people claim don't exist.
Moss was the inside man for Sloan Kettering and this is the only reason he got copies of otherwise confidential documents.
If you want a smoking gun video then this is it.
I've yet to see a good rebuttal of the claims made in the video... although many people misrepresent the evidence. Let the evidence speak for itself.
If you would like to watch a well-documented expose of why we're not winning the war on cancer then this is a good place to start.
:-)
Original video, original documents, original photos, original interviews and original studies.
If it's there in writing or on video it's really hard not to give it a lot of credibility.
It's also a good explanation of how laetrile works. Too few people understand the science... and so it tends to be misrepresented. They also refer back to the original studies... the ones some people claim don't exist.
Moss was the inside man for Sloan Kettering and this is the only reason he got copies of otherwise confidential documents.
If you want a smoking gun video then this is it.
I've yet to see a good rebuttal of the claims made in the video... although many people misrepresent the evidence. Let the evidence speak for itself.
If you would like to watch a well-documented expose of why we're not winning the war on cancer then this is a good place to start.
:-)
I certainly didn't come away disappointed (which I kind of expected given many poor reviews)... but neither did I come away thinking "wow".
It probably helps if you know the back story better than most people... as the movie dotted the i's and crossed the t's for all the most important things.
In the original it felt like you were there... but in this one I kept thinking that this looked like it was a set (quite a small one often).
The pace is ferocious at times... they're trying to cram in as much as possible. This doesn't allow the characters to be developed very much.
I'm glad I saw it... and I think most star wars fans won't be too disappointed as it's not as bad as some people make it out to be.
The box office seems to tell a different story to many of the reviews (a lot of people have seen it). I have never seen so many reviews focussing on the box office... yet mostly glossing over the fact that it's been quite successful financially. Is someone out to torpedo the film?
I've never seen so many reviews focussing on minutiae in the film... while finding very few reviews that look at the big picture? I assume that some of this is paid content (people being paid to write articles)... but if it is... it's weird paid content... as all it did was keep the movie in the public eye... not encourage the reader to view the movie (a lot of it wasn't all that positive).
This movie has been hyped a lot. Fortunately it's not all bad. You're going to be disappointed if you don't see it.
:-)
It probably helps if you know the back story better than most people... as the movie dotted the i's and crossed the t's for all the most important things.
In the original it felt like you were there... but in this one I kept thinking that this looked like it was a set (quite a small one often).
The pace is ferocious at times... they're trying to cram in as much as possible. This doesn't allow the characters to be developed very much.
I'm glad I saw it... and I think most star wars fans won't be too disappointed as it's not as bad as some people make it out to be.
The box office seems to tell a different story to many of the reviews (a lot of people have seen it). I have never seen so many reviews focussing on the box office... yet mostly glossing over the fact that it's been quite successful financially. Is someone out to torpedo the film?
I've never seen so many reviews focussing on minutiae in the film... while finding very few reviews that look at the big picture? I assume that some of this is paid content (people being paid to write articles)... but if it is... it's weird paid content... as all it did was keep the movie in the public eye... not encourage the reader to view the movie (a lot of it wasn't all that positive).
This movie has been hyped a lot. Fortunately it's not all bad. You're going to be disappointed if you don't see it.
:-)
I read a bad review and only went because there was nothing else that looked promising.
I'm glad I went because I enjoyed it a LOT.
The plot was easy to follow and flowed smoothly.
The CGI was great.
A couple of the lines could have been delivered slightly better...
...but it was enjoyable anyway.
My girlfriend liked it too... and she normally doesn't like action movies: She liked the Queen (Nicole Kidman), Princess Mera and the romantic bits of the movie.
Ignore the negative reviews if you're on the fence about this one. It's highly recommended.
:-)
I'm glad I went because I enjoyed it a LOT.
The plot was easy to follow and flowed smoothly.
The CGI was great.
A couple of the lines could have been delivered slightly better...
...but it was enjoyable anyway.
My girlfriend liked it too... and she normally doesn't like action movies: She liked the Queen (Nicole Kidman), Princess Mera and the romantic bits of the movie.
Ignore the negative reviews if you're on the fence about this one. It's highly recommended.
:-)