Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

M2b

Reviews

54 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Tourist (I) (2010)
9/10
Spoilers GALORE!! But read this, and see this film TWICE !!
27 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers Galore!!! Please don't read this if you haven't seen it.....twice. No, go ahead and read this. And if you haven't seen this badly misunderstood film once, go ahead and read this anyway.

This film needs to be saved. If every professional reviewer had seen this film TWICE, not once, I think it would have been announced with very favorable reviews, and better box office. In a sense, this film is an argument for the asymetrcial non-linear final cutting that Quentin Tarantino is most famous for. If only the audience knew what the characters knew or didn't know at the time, they would see a different film. Think there's little or no chemistry between Jolie and Depp? Watch the film the second time, and whammo, there it is. Did you think the artificial non-tobacco cigarette was a distracting triffle, silly to the film? Not when you know the truth revealed in the ending of the movie. Think the Depp character was too nerdy to attract the gorgeous Jolie's attention? EXACTLY !! And it worked!

Spoilers SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS But read this ANYWAY!!

The never seen genius had to concoct a scheme to get the money, get the girl, kill the gangsters, and appease the police. In order to do this, the unseen genius had to re-invent himself as the ultimate nerd, so convincing, he would convince EVERYONE that he was the new image, and not the genius below. Everyone including the girl had to buy what he was selling. He wanted to be with Jolie to spend the enormous ill gotten gains with her, so he would find the meaning in life he wanted. The meaning that the character saw evaded the rich gangster, and the inflated ego driven Interpol agent after him. And once you've seen the film once, on the second time, then and only then will you see the genius at work. Because the genius not only sold himself as a nerd to the killers, the police and the girl, he sold the audience too. So everyone is wondering how can we believe the nerd can win a Jolie? And when will he get killed, being in so over his head? Watch carefully the second time, and you'll see every subtle move that Depp invents to push along his plot, and convince the others he's a nerd. The genius throws in just enough to reel in Jolie to his love, while still selling himself to everyone, including Jolie's character, that he's a nerd.

Have you wondered why Jolie's husband Brad Pitt, with whom she has the greatest of screen chemistries, was not cast in the part? Simple. He's too damn good looking. Impossible for Pitt, I don't care how much make-up they apply to make him look worse, could come off as the nerd who still wins the heart of the girl. Depp can and did pull this off. And only those who see the film twice will see that.
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Dilemma (2011)
1/10
A chick flick for men with no dicks. It is THAT bad.
17 January 2011
This is not a comedy by any means. The laughter is sparse at best and does not belong in the tone of this pseudo-drama. It's not a drama either. It might have worked as a preposterous chick flick, except the principals caught in the conflict are guys, not chicks. Nobody, and I mean nobody would act the way the mentally retarded characters invented by the sceeenwriter would if faced with the situation. Not women, not men. Everybody in the film is pathetic, including the retarded lothario and the cheating spouse. I would hope that none of the actors in the film would act this way either, that is if they mistake themselves for adults. Alan Loeb already has one preposterous failed comedy to his credit..the excrable Switch. That's the Jennifer Anniston vehicle based on the hilarious proposition of an accidental sperm switch at a Manhattan insemination party. Yes. Talk about humorous possibilities. I would like to think a Sid Ceasar could rise from the grave, save the world from Alan Loeb, and then return. For those of you not living on earth, even the creepiest from Manhattan do not throw artificial insemination parties. Someone should tell Loeb.

So in the The Dilemma we have two creepy non-friends with not a clue as to what real friendship means, and replace that with severe angst, violence, and lead bolt stupidity. Friends like this no one needs. But one suspects that is all the desperate Loeb can find. I wonder did the actors read this odiferous script and then sign on. Or did they merely need the paychecks, no matter how bad. I used to like Ron Howard's work. I started to turn against him when he defamed the memory of the late Max Baer Sr for no good reason in The Cinderella Man. He had the story hook of how hard the desperately poor James Braddock worked for his title shot, while then talented Baer ignored his training. So Howard reinvents Baer as a crazed arrogant killer. Unforgivable.

Howard's new effort is worse. Friends don't let friends see the Dilemma
15 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Crazy Heart (2009)
3/10
My eagerly awaited review of Crazy Heart
31 January 2010
Huh?

When does the movie start? The film is formulaic, predictable, pleasant. That's the good news, it won't kill you to sit thru it. Wait for Johnny Depp's Mad Hatter to go see when you're in a mood to end your own life.

I don't understand the raves for Jeff Bridges' performance, and I like him, always have. I think that's how he's winning awards for Crazy Heart, people like him. His performance is professional. He does the job. It's not in any way a stand out job of acting, really. He's good, that's it. Maggie Gyllenthal is also OK as his younger lover interest. She looks great from the neck up and Bridges' Bad Blake keeps yapping about how gorgeous she is. But they don't keep the camera away from her skinny body and flat bottom, and frankly, she didn't look that hot to me. They could have cast this part better. The best thing in the film was a big star's unadvertised part as Bad Blake's super successful protégé. It's not a secret if you look it up, like they did with Tom Cruise in Tropic Thunder, but this guy's performance was the best in the film, so I won't ruin the surprise and name the star here.

In the film, they keep raving about how great the song that Bad Blake writes for Maggie is, called (surprise) Crazy Heart. Huh? (again). The song is truly truly ordinary, far less as songs than the ones supposed to be Bad Blake's old hits. In the film, I think they briefly mention some famous-not so famous country song writer/singer who the Bad Blake character is supposed to be based on. I never heard of him before, and likely won't ever again.

The cinematography of the Southwest is excellent, breathtaking at times. The film is not. It is being badly overrated by the jackal pack that reviews films nowadays. They sniff out what the consensus is saying, and write accordingly.

If you wait for DVD-rental, unless you're a country music fan, you won't make it thru the two hours without falling asleep or hitting pause to go surf the channels. Trust me.
30 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Woodman hits a home run, finally (some mild spoilers)
19 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Perhaps the oldest working director in films (at least that would seem to be so for a successful stand-up comic WHO STARTED IN THE FIFTIES!) has turned out a beaut. Woody Allen has penned an adult romantic comedy with ten times the laughs (at least for me) of Pineapple Express. Called "Vicky And Christina Spend the Summer in Barcelona".

The star of the film is none other than the cold killer from No Country For Old Men, Oscar winner Javier Bardem proving his acting range goes way beyond scaring the s-word out of people. He plays a full of life, passionate Spanish painter-lover, and bless him for this. He nails a fine-wine getting hotter as she gets older Penelope Cruz, an equally desirable please-let-me-have-this Scarlett Johansen and a prissy uptight academic Rebecca Hall, who none of you ever heard of before (admit it). Sometimes more than one of them at the same time.

The acting is flawless. That's why Penelope and Scarlett stand out from other cinema hotties....they can act, they both have their craft down perfectly. Sadly, none of them go nude in the flick, but guys, there is a scene between Penny and Scarlett that will make you want to stand up and cheer anyway. YAHOOOOOO !!!

Woody's script shows two particular brilliancies, that seems to evade the rest of the hacks of Hollywood. He likes to insert his own film personnae into his films, and this time it's the Rebecca Hall character who does the Woodman's comedic pseudo-intellectual schtick. Really smart to switch himself to the woman, cause when he's used younger actors as himself, it becomes imitative parody and fails. And Woody himself it just too old for any make-up genius to make you think he is only 60, an age he passed a long long time ago. Rebecca is remarkable, holding her own against the two stellar screen beauties...and making her far less than super looks come out as still highly desirable.....in controlled passion coming out of it's containment at last.

Secondly, Woody brilliantly uses a narrator to make his cinematic novel come alive. The dialogue you would read in a novel comes to life in the faces of this great crew of actors. And instead of adding 30+ minutes of extraneous films to set the scene, or making stupid dialogue just so the audience can be informed of the plot, a simple line or two or concise narration keeps the film moving at a perfect pace. And Woody uses a young actor, not his old self for the narrator, which would have detracted from the youth and exuberance of the film.

Also, the musical score and the cinematography are great, simply great. Good job old guy. I loved the film. You made us old guys proud. And err, next time could you let us see Johannsen's goods. I KNOW she's shown you, you can't lie to M2b. So share.
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
21 (2008)
3/10
How much did Mezrich get paid to sell his soul?
7 August 2008
This movie may or may not be entertaining to the viewer, depending on your taste. But it in no way shape or form even resembles Mezrich's Bringing Down the House. Anyone saying this politically corrected script created for this film from scratch even RESEMBLES Mezrich's Bringing Down the House, NEVER read the book. Where's Monaco? Where's the Russian leader of the pack? Where are the OTHER casinos they gambled in? The film also is based on the preposterous rationality (NO WHERE IN THE BOOK) that a poor student can't go to Harvard Med without joining a card reading Blackjack team. Right. That's because Stuident Loans have not been invented. And they don't give Student Loans to Harvard Med students. And Harvard Med grads never earn enough money to pay back their student loans, because a Harvard degree is so worthless on the market. RIGHT!!! Only rich kids go to Harvard or MIT. Right! Not one poor kid to be found on their campus. Right. Well, if your gullible, stupid, politically correct, and proud of all that, you'll buy into the stupid script. I wonder how much Mezrich was paid. I wonder if he retains the right to someday make a movie out of his book. I love the idiotic contributors to IMDb.com calling this film "fact based". Losers.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This film made me ashamed, for a few minutes after, to be white
26 April 2006
I took my Mom to see "Friends With Money". I hate the horror genre but having Freddie Krueger appear in this flick to slice up, torture and kill these revulsive characters could only have improved the film.

It runs 88 minutes, but they did not even have 88 minutes of script. They have a 60 second scene in which, Jennifer Anniston washes her face. Time the scene if you don't believe me. They had a 45 second scene in which Jennifer Anniston walks down the frozen food isle of a supermarket, opens about three of the doors, and finally pulls out one item and throws it in her shopping cart. I AM NOT KIDDING! You could not see the item! It wasn't even a gratuitous advertisement. They shot the scene anyway, and put it in the final cut! I think they had to shoot the frozen food and face wash scenes, cause they were far off the target film release of 90 minutes that the distributors want. There were likely other filler scenes, but I had my eyes closed during about 1/3 of the film. Napping. If you hate white people, this is the film for you. I would imagine you would find people not quite as revulsive as these creatures in an AMFAR dinner.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Try to catch this in the movies, not DVD (spoilers galore)
15 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Had to rush to catch this at the AMC-25 before it disappeared, as I suspected this was a wide screen venture. Well, it's a wide screen film awright, lots of swell CGI. The story is about these Necromongers led by the Human Flash who conquer planets on the way to the heavenly uber-verse, but the sole surviving Fallopian stands in their way, so naturally, the Flash King fights the Fallopian (Vin Diesel) and looses and Vin becomes the new King of the NecroMangia, this after he stages a thrilling escape with his new woman from a prison planet called Superhotfootentia. Or maybe Meltafleshatoria. Sumthin like that. Swell film. A little low on credibility.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
thank god this disgrace is doing terrible box office
21 June 2004
there is still hope for humanity. This abomination is an

insult to Jules Verne and the classic Around the World with David Niven. Jackie Chan could have tailored another indistinquishable vehicle for himself without the cruel and vicious insults that this film is filled with. The slapstick humor is few and far between. The cameo's, are some way down the pike from the Hollywood A-List that

graced the original. The split-tooth "French" girl that shares this insipid adventure was as alluring as a block of lead. Maybe the lead could do better. I left the theatre angrty, disappointed, and hoping the scriptwriters would be given their next assignment in downtown Kabul.

I hope it loses a fortune. Yeuchh.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sauron and the Orks...all they ever do is lose! (spoilers)
2 January 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Sauron, the evil eye, looses. He gets stronger. They keep telling us how he gets stronger and stronger and he just keeps losing. Imagine if he had won something? In Fellowship, the Orcs kill one Prince of Gondor. he kills about 50 of them first, but hey, who's keeping score? In Towers, some ronin riders of Rohan come upon an Orc battalion and guess what? Ork Stew! They do pretty well with 10,000 orkies in the battle of Helmskeep or Helmsdeep or whatever, until the newly whitened gray wizard shows up with a few thousand riders (Rohan-ians or Gondor-ians? I cannot remember) and, once again, 10,000 orcs are soon fit for the pot. At the same time, the large Tree-things retake the other tower city with the other white (bad) wizard, wipe out that army, destroy that tower and eliminate the Evil Eye's most loyal bad-white-wizard ally. I'd say at that point, that Sauron is doing very badly. Maybe Bagdad Bob would say he's just getting stronger, because that's exactly what Good-white-wizard says even as her surveys two massive battle victories. Imagine if they had lost? Now, in Rings, the evil eye sends another 10,000 orks against the capital city of Gondor: Minas Gerais. Well, some Minas, if not Gerais. How do they do? Well, okay until Aragon shows up with a new phantom army pledged to fight for the True King. That's 20,000 orks gone in two big battles, and just how many orks did the tree-things kill? Oh, and a GIRL kills his top flying magical warrior. This is not good for Evil Eyes! If I was the evil eye, I'd be worried at this point, wouldn't you? Nope, he's fine. So long as the Ring isn't melting in Mordor, he's just getting stronger. Yessirree. So, we take what's left of the Gondor-Rohan merged cavalry and ride out to the Doors of Doom to "distract" the last remaining 10,000 orks. I guess Evil felt a 30,000 man ork army was enough to bring back evil to Middle Earth. The schmuck! So's his only fear is a melting ring, he stations ONE killer giant spider to protect the Mordor furnace, and just sends out his last 10,000 orkies into a diversionary battle. Evil personified? Maybe. As dumb as they come? No doubt.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Personal Note from Black Mamba to O Ren Iishi
27 October 2003
Thank you O Ren, Thank you Crazy 88's, and all your Yakuza, every single one of you without any exceptions, for not packing one single gun amongst you. Not one.

Thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you. Thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you. Thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spirited Away (2001)
Praisers of this un-translatable mismash are flat out wrong.
27 October 2003
You will have to dig, and I mean really really dig to find any non-Japaneese children who can stand this film. I mean not walk out. Mydaughter, age 8, hated the video. My son, age 12, made me walk out on pain of watching him commit suicide. We left. I only rented it out

of curiousity. Fell asleep about half way. Sufferred thru the second half out of morbid curiousity the second day. This iconoclastic strange Anime does not translate any more than Sailor That Fell From Grace With The Sea. Remember that? Chris Kristofferson? Sylvia Miles? The peeping son gets his friends together and chops up old Chris? Yeah, right!

But more importantly are the liars amongst you. The liars to yourselves. You owe yourself and apology and an a re-examination of your motivations. THIS FILM WAS NOT DENIED EXPOSURE by a Disney conspiracy. They test marketed it. And they saw the kids walk out.....in droves. With their parents just as happy to leave. That's the truth and it is way past time for you to deal with it. This animation is as bad as a

film can get. That's why it was rejected. Accept it!

The Last Emporer and Chariots of Fire deserved their Academy Awards.

This fish out of water did not. Robbing Lilo and Stitch for this

un-watchable bilge was a crime. You Academy voters are not open minded. You're detached from reality.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Why do you guys like (care) about these cloying losers?
6 October 2003
whatever the film's merits, and the Unemployed Critic gave this a surprising 10, it's very hard to feel any sympathy for people living great lives, such as Murray's character, his new gorgeous (no other way to describe her at all) young friend, or for that matter Sofia or Francis Coppola who manage to find ways to be depressed and all upset about life's imperfections. Does that include you? This film was a major disappointment and I suspect is sung from Sofia to her chorus. Lesser people living lesser lives but finding more out of it than these compulsive depressives will not find this film enlightening or entertaining. It's a failure, not a success. Like the characters. They should go away.

and BTW, the casting for the young photographer was pathetic with a

capital "P". His character was never believable for one single second. No way a gorgeous woman falls for an undisguised nerd like that. That part required a handsome, charismatic young man who, absorbed with himself, distances himself from his beautiful wife, unaware because of his self-absorption. This nerd was unspeakable. No credible way this

marriage ever happened in the first place. My guess is Sofia, who although Hollywood royalty, dated many nerds in her time precisely because her talent exceeds her looks by miles and miles, just thinks that other women are also attracted to this kind of guy. Oh yeah, sure.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Batman (1989)
I repeat, a lot of you boys and girls didn't get this!!
9 July 2003
One reviewer down below said, "all style, no substance"!!! Talk about shooting a shotgun and missing the whole barn!!

Let me tell you what you missed. This film is analogous to World War II. It's an American-British alliance forced into despicable fascistic behavior in order to crush the Axis powers. You might have heard of this name, Hitler?????? Nicholson's Joker's television takeover "I am not the terrorist, Batman Is" speech is lifted directly from the same speech that Hitler made over the radio 60 years ago referrring to a terrorist named Winston Churchill. This world has gone out of scale and human beings have been reduced to cartoon figures, overwhelmed by the out-scale world they built not realizing what was happenning. Joker embraces this new fascistic world of evil and gratification. Batman copes with it, never understanding why young Jack Napier wasted his parents for no more than a whim. Art museums are supposed to be art museums, not privileged snooty restaurants for the well connected. The media is SUPPOSED to take sides against evil (Robert Wuhl), not be fascinated by it (Kim Bassinger). Police Commissioner's are not supposed to be familiar with the dice tables. This film is fascism vs. fascism in a world gone out of scale. Only the tormented Batman lowers himself to his enemies level (exactly what WE did in WW-2) so as to defeat him and then afterwards, try to reclaim his humanity. The film also works as mass entertainment. "What kind of a world do we live in where a man dressed up as a Bat steals all of my press?" This is a cinematic Masterwork up there with Citizen Kane and best of John Ford. Sorry some of you didn't pick up on that. You missed it.

Your loss, not ours.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
These Ork-things ain't so tough after all
28 January 2003
All they ever do is lose. Every single trained human soldier in these films beats the ork-things as the flash of a bow. Fifty ronin led by a renegade prince come across some Orks. Bye bye orks. The soldiers from the other kingdom travelling stealthily over

the land meets an ork Army. Guess who looses. Easily. You guessing? Yup, the Orks get kicked again. And then finally Helms-Keep. Old men are holding them off and they out number the human-elf army by about 500 to one or so. Mighty tough Orks, aren't they? When White Wizard (much much tougher than gray wizards) arrives with a few thousand horseman, it's Ork-Stew for everyone!

It's a good thing they shot this movie in New Zealand because Middle Earth is just about that big and no more. Ten thousand baddie Orks? Whoppee. I seem to remember civil wars around this earth where ten thousand casulties was more a skirmish than a battle. And this was suppossed to be round one between ultimate evil and whatever on the other side.

Can someone explain to me what Solon wants? More sex? How about a body? I understand Hitler, I understand Stalin, I understand Saddam and Osama. Two films into the trilogy and I ain't got one clue (NOT A CLUE!) as to what Solon wants. Could somebody please tell me. If he wins the ultimate battle, what does he get? Ork women? Puhhleeease.

The first film had some intrigue into it, the fellowship, the quest, the characters, the bonding etc. Oh yeah, one prince in the fellowship was actually defeated by Orks. He killed about 25 of them first, but was defeated by odds of about 200 Orks to one. Boy those Orks sure are tough.

The Two Towers was interminable. Let there be closure in the the third episode. We need it.

One last question. Those of you who love these films. Are you, like, subscribers to the "conspiratorialist" school of history? That would explain a lot.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Swept Away (1974)
superwoman wins, not by planning, but wins
29 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
I can't say this was what Lina Wertmuller was shooting for. But it seemed to this viewer, that the luscious, sex-in-every-pore, Mariangela Melato was playing a super woman who always wins, no matter what. She adapts. To whatever. And wins. She won her first world by totally dominating her rich husband and all his servants. It worked. It was never her plan. It just worked. And so she tries to dominate Gianinni when they are stranded. It doesn't work. His survival skills are necessary and his personality is not to be dominated, at least not in the regular way. And so she surrenders to him. Not by plan. But still she surrenders completely and totally to him. And his passion for the conquered goddess becomes so consuming that he is now the conquered, the consumed. She's not in control, but she's in fact totally in control. Super woman has won. Super woman understands that this paradise they have fallen into works only if they stay in this Eden. The smitten fool realizes this too, but must bite the forbidden apple to satisfy his fool's desire to see the truth in front of his eyes. Once out of Paradise, super woman, armed with new tools learned in her stay in Paradise, begins a new conquest of her husband's world. She's super woman and she will win again, not by intent, but because she is who she is. The fool goes back to his fat wife and his foolish life and his foolish passions. He lost. She won. She always wins, all the time.

Thank you Lena, for this incredible film and this unfogettable film viewing experience. You should know, Lena, that the lovely date I took to this film in NYC's Paris Cinema so long ago, well, she shook at the climax of the rape scene. I think she actually had an orgasm right there.

Let the film professionals dwell in the horrors of wars and

Concentration Camps in Seven Beauties. Let them find their insights and meanings of the world in that. That's their world. This is Lena's masterpeice for the people. People living lives. Thank you.
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Long Live the Rock!! or at least as long as the Scorpion King
21 April 2002
Way way back in Mummy Returns, the Scorpion King starts out losing his empire to some other warrior kings, with lots and lots of pyramids in the backgrounds. And so he does what any good Scorpion King would do, bites off the head of a large scorpion and sells his soul to the evil God Annubis and soon conquers all the world, with lots and lots of pyramids in the background, with his dog faced dark sand soldiers, who disappear after he conquers all.

Now this prequel tells us right off the bat, that Scorpy does all his rising up from trained assassin to warrior king in the time BEFORE the pyramids.

So, I just assume that during the reign of Scorpion-1, the whole world got together and built lots and lots of pyramids to provide appropriate backgrounds for Mummy Returns. Right?

Anyway, it ain't really a prequel, is it? But it sure was a lot of fun taking my son and two pals to the midnight show at the

College Point Multiplex for this swell action comedy. It was fun. And why shouldn't the Rock be the next Arnold now that Arnold is too old to be Arnold. If IMDB had been around 20 years ago, the same people criticizing Rock's acting would have been death on Arnold back then, and they're lying if they say otherwise. To themselves.

And Kelly Hu? No offense boys, but I'll take Kelly in my dreams over that Latin egomaniac you call J-LO, anyday and twice on Sundays.

If you like movies, see the flick. If you don't, find another website
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cadillac Man (1990)
The salesman as Hero! Waytogo Robin (for a change)
9 April 2002
it's my theory that following the "success" of Dead Poet's Society, Robin Williams began a personal crusade to produce the most cloying, annoying, politically-corrected, sickeningly sappy body of work of any star in the history of Hollywood: Patch Adams, Centennial Man, Toys, Good Will Hunting, Mrs, Doubtfire, Jack, etcetera, ad nauseum, and the newest and most worthy contender to the body of dreck: Death to Smootchy.

But lo and behold, one year after the turning point, when Robin changed from quick witted comic to pedantic instructor to the lessor informed than himself, this little gem is released.

What other film has ever cast the salesman as the hero. Not a tragic failure, but a force of life. A hero, who "sells" the emotionally disturbed gunmen to surrender and not hurt anyone. The salesman who is the only possible hero to save this day!

He sells cars to everybody. He sells himself to multiple girlfriends far more attractive than himself, because he is the consumate salesman. I dare anyone to name me one work of literature or film who's creators were incorrect enough to find good, not bad, in the salesman. Contrast this with the very correct Glengarry Glen Ross, the result of David Mamet's never-ending search for the ugly underbellies ruining the world wherever he gazes.

Salesman as "force majeur"! And Robin Williams performance is perfect. Oh Robin, the saddest words of kith and kin are surely these: it might have been. Thanks you for this gem of a film standing out from the horrid body of work you have left us.
12 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vanilla Sky (2001)
I want Cruise and Crowe Dead Yesterday!!! Spoilers Galore
29 January 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Please read my spoilers and say yourself the admission!

The whole damn film is a Cryogenic Dream! It's a g-ddamn cryogenic dream!!! Who the Hell cares about someone else's cryogenic dream and why would they in the first place anyway?

How bad is this "daring experimental edgey" film? Do you care about Tom Cruise's personal nightmare? That he looses his face? His nightmare, not mine. Believe it or not kiddies (and I do mean kiddies!) there are strong people out there who can and do cope with worse than that. And they never had what Cruise at least got to have before he looses his face.

If you loved this film, you must have worked for CBS years ago....remember how they tried to save Dallas? They just decided to make the whole season a DREAM and bring back the ratings draw Bobby character. Now they do it in movies.

As slow as this awful film was, and even as useless an exercise in time wasting as watching Penelope and Tom fall for each other is, I had just that tinge of intrique. How could someone be disfigured in a scorned lover's vengeful attempt at double suicide and then be indicted for murder? How? How? Cryogenic Dream, that's how! A g-ddamn stupid who gives a damn cryogenic dream!!!!!

Experimental? Daring? Inventive? ABRE LOS OJOS, IMBECILE !!!!!!!!!!!!

Question. Was the original Spanish version based on the same lame pretext? I would have hoped for bettter from Europeans.

It pains me that this film is doing modestly well in the box office. I would like to think that the competition is equally poor right now. I really liked Crowe's Almost Famous effort last time. I hope to God he's not going to give us more of this stuff. Please.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beautiful Men, Un-Pretty Woman, Hmmmmmmm
13 December 2001
Hollywood's great gay casting directors have done it again and they must be proud. Clooney and Pitt couldn't possibly be better looking. Julia Roberts for the female lead? Maybe ten years ago. What's the one thing that all pop video's, black or white, have in commom. The men are all butt ugly and the women are drop dead gorgeous. I guess out of all those staggerring beauties, none of them can act, or, Hollywood film directors and pop video directors use different casting agencies. Very different.

At least Julia's a name star. But it's just impossible to believe that two super studs like Clooney and Garcia go to war over Roberts (maybe Eric instead). Oh, yes,

she's still pretty by real life standards. But in a film close-up? Puhlleassse.

Robert Redford can't play college kids no more nor can Marlon Brando be cast as the Thin Man. No matter how great the actor, you can't be the part if you don't look the part.

This is an Okay film at best. The lack of a real Hollywood beauty in the only female part hurts badly. And they'll pay for this at the box office.

When the credits said, "and introducing Julia Roberts", well, that was a cute touch at the end.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wide Screen (please) this is not a video rental!
11 December 2001
First, thank you Steven Spielberg for making this chancy, different and incredible film. Virtually unmarketable. What could the target audience be? It's a science fiction speculation; it's slow but it's fascinating from start to finish. An excellent use of Haley Joel Osment, merely the best child actor to come down the pike so far. He has so much talent for one so young, the critics will crawl out of the walls to tear him down with glee. This ain't no family film, that's for sure. Spielberg gave us "1941" years ago and now "A.I." Quite a fellow.

But for those of you willing to gamble on this flick; you must find some movie house playing it. This is not a small screen film, in any possible way. See it small and the effect will be diminished. So try to find some house playing it somewhere, or perhaps some high quality giant TV somewhere. Keep your mind open and give it a chance. This is no marketing scheme like Blair Witch or Scary Movie. This is genuine risk taking filmmaking and with a high budget too!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
How perspectives change after September 11, 2001
9 October 2001
I've felt, in the past, that this was Rob Reiner's best work.

An extremely entertaining courtroom drama, nicely expanded to movie size.

Now after 9-11-01, I wish Colonel Jessup was training his Marines to take Kabul or Kandalahar. I wish Corporal Dawson and Private Downey were preparing to do what they trained so hard to do.

I wish Colonel Markinson would think twice about committing suicide as his troops could use his experience and leadership. I wish Private Santiago would stop whinning and just get with the program. And I wish Tom Cruise would get out of his "faggoty white uniform" and pick up a rifle instead. And maybe Demi would consider showing her appreciation to these heroes, one at a time, before they ship out, with something better than a really stirring legal brief, such as a night that each would remember before they drop down into Hell on earth. To fight on behalf of those who died like dogs under two 110 story piledrivers, their bodies pulverized and never to be found.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't get mad at Madden, this boy tries hard....
27 August 2001
to do the impossible; make a European movie with an American film style, wide screen, special effects, major musical score, stars chosen over actors. Nevertheless, he should be commended for this enjoyable cinema story- telling. Nick Cage is an Amercian of Italian ancestry, and his trained accent may be forced, but how can anyone NOT like Nick Cage. He has screen charisma. He's not really beautiful but he lights up the screen in all of his work. Penelope Cruz is another matter. Who cast her as the salutable Bella Bambina?? She's cute. Yes, I'll give you that, she's cute and has nice curves for a 98 pound wonder. She's a competent actress. But she cannot

be mistaken for a young Sofia Loren, not even a young Laura Antonelli. This part screamed out for the type of heart stopping screen beauty that really stands out. It doesn't matter if she's a bedroom wizard (which she very likely is) because that only helps Tom Cruise, John Madden and the other lucky stars and producers. It doesn't come across on screen and it even costs money to the filmakers. That's what makes me think she's THAT good. Even in Captain Correlli, the gal playing the executed girlfriend (Vicky Moragaki??) of the German captain outshone Ms. Cruz on screen. That was a salutable bella bambina, not Penelope.

But Mr. Madden should be commended for making this flick which will surely lose money in America but may do well in Europe (I hear they like Amercian movies which is why the French keep trying to outlaw them), and I hope his close times with Cruz were worth the losses entailed in the miscasting. See you at the chalkboard Monday, John!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
They finally got the comic book movie right
17 May 2001
It sure took Hollywood enough tries to get it. Mummy-1 was just such a failure, all special effects but with an unengrossing storyline that passed outside the borders of even comic book credibility.

In Mummy Returns, they nailed it just right and gave us a thoroughly enjoyable summer popcorn movie. But don't bring the little ones, too much gore and scariness for

the six and unders.

The scene where Neela fails to find the courage to rescue her man, when Nefertirri has just rescued hers, so that doom falls to the selfish and victory to the courageous, well, if that isn't old Stan Lee at his best, then what is? You could just see the panels when Patricia Velasquez chooses poorly!

Batman (the 1989 Original) was much more than a comic book movie. Tim Burton took his Magna Opus all the way up to

art film. And the enjoyable Superman-1 was a successful flick but director Donner took the camp route to entertainment. It worked but it was no longer a real comic book film. And

Night Shamalayan's Unbreakable was also much more than a mere comic book movie.

Think of all the failures. The Batman and Superman sequels. The Conan films. The "B" movies with "B" stars.

Here they got it right. It flows like a comic book, has the action, the characters, the plot, the moral at the end. If you hate comic book movies, you won't like Mummuy Returns. If you like them but have been disappointed, perfection is waiting for you.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spy Kids (2001)
Lame Still Reigns, why are we kidding ourselves?
13 April 2001
I don't understand the positive reviews for this film. I especially cannot fathom Roger Ebert anymore, who ten years ago was so dead-on accurate in his ups and downs. Is it age? Is it Siskel's death? Did Ebert ever raise kids?

My five year old enjoyed this, but she enjoys going to the movies with Dad and the older kids, particularly on rainy days when the parks are all wet. Two thriteens, one 12, and one ten year old quietly sufferred thru this mild nightmare and looked for the better spots.

This is a dumb film with a dumb script. The special effects suffer from the fact that they are blatantly obviously non-real visual effects. They lose the thread of credibility needed to bring the audience in. The ridiculous storyline and the bad guy becomes good guy (straight out of the WWF no-less!) plot makes this a hopeless film. After the Toy Story's, Tarzan, Lion King, Emporer's Groove and Ants, I guess Hollywood figured that if the Japaneese can make money inflicting sufferring on parents (Pokemon), then why can't they too.

Writer's strike coming up? Are they hiring scabs, by any chance? Quality would go up.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nurse Betty (2000)
Easy on the Analysis, boys and girls, it's just a movie
20 March 2001
Not so bad, but boy, do the IMDB'ers get carried away. Hating men, Western v. melodrama, the script is overwritten (?),

(that from a very very LONG comment in here), well, hoo-hah, guys, take it easy. Today's filmgoers must learn to treasure any film out of Hollywood that doensn't suck. Treasure! Nurse Betty meets the big four criteria: 1. It's entertaining. 2. It's new enough to be called fresh. 3. It's well casted. and 4. (the bog four), it doesn't suck.

Hollywood has proved in the year 2000 that there is nothing

easier to do than make a film that sucks and nothing harder than to make one that doesn't suck. And I always thought rocket-science and stand-up comedy were the two toughest things in the universe. In the year 2000, the badly scripted Gladiator and the un-watchable un-endurable Erin Brockavich (don't care about mispellings there) are the favorites going into the Academy Awards!! Favorites! The best of the bunch!

And so, rent Nurse Betty and enjoy a small clever movie with a story that will hook you and a sort of happy ending. Remember, and this is important, it doesn't suck.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed