User reviews

This was an interesting show, something different. I felt as viewers we were not presented with sufficient information about the actual case. Little time was given to present the case's facts to the viewers - the jury had a couple of days of presentations where as viewers had only a few minutes. Most of the program was about watching the jurors - and after all, that's the subject matter. But the conversations between them were pretty basic and repetitive. That might be the editing. It seemed clear from the start how most of them would vote and at the end, peer pressure played a big part in the outcome. What I did learn was that I really don't want to be on a jury. Some of the jurors were respectful but some so annoying, particularly the women who continually rolled their eyes, pulled faces and snickered when others spoke. The show could have been improved with a timer, to indicate the progress of the court proceedings and the length of deliberation.

This show is an engrossing blend of true crime and reality TV that offers a fresh perspective on courtroom dramas. This innovative show recreates a real-life murder case and the trial that follows, focusing not on the lawyers or the defendant, but on the jury tasked with deciding the verdict. It's a fascinating glimpse into the deliberations, doubts, and dynamics that unfold behind closed doors.

The series (so far!) masterfully captures the emotional and intellectual journey of the jurors, letting viewers see how their opinions shift as evidence is presented and arguments are made. What sets it apart is its ability to make you question your own assumptions about the defendant's guilt. One moment you're convinced they did it; the next, a piece of testimony or a juror's insight has you second-guessing everything.

The reality TV format adds an extra layer of intrigue, making it feel as though you're sitting in on intimate, unfiltered discussions. It's compelling television that not only satisfies true crime enthusiasts but also captivates anyone interested in the human psyche and the complexities of justice.

Highly recommended for fans of courtroom dramas and true crime alike, The Jury: Death on the Staircase is a binge-worthy exploration of morality, doubt, and the weight of deciding someone's fate.

Really interesting insight but I was really distracted by the fact that this jury was supposed to have sat over 7 or 8 days. However not one juror had changed any item of their clothing during the period of a week??? Really ? I find this so hard to believe and a very unfortunate distraction to what was a great experiment. There is just no way the jury members were filmed over the period of a week and not one of them had a fresh shirt or blouse, especially the women (apologies, a mere observation and not meant to be a gender judgement). It does raises questions for me regarding the voracity of the timeline within the experiment 😊