12 reviews
- sartreheideggerkierkegaard
- Dec 19, 2024
- Permalink
I have seen less than 50 percent of Bille August work and never liked any of his movies, actually most of it made me wanna puke and think he is totally overrated. Mediocre movies that I feel are so poorly made but this one is just amazing.
Maybe it is because this Story is just so amazing, that his talent finally come to show. But this is the best version of the The count of Monte Christo I have ever seen.
Great acting, great flow in the story, cinematic experience was superb felt like a historical experience and the audio was amazing.
Our family, old and young, was glued to the screen for two days.
The only minus was the pretentious birth name of his daughter who had a minor role in the movie which she did, ok. So we withdraw the tenth star.
Maybe it is because this Story is just so amazing, that his talent finally come to show. But this is the best version of the The count of Monte Christo I have ever seen.
Great acting, great flow in the story, cinematic experience was superb felt like a historical experience and the audio was amazing.
Our family, old and young, was glued to the screen for two days.
The only minus was the pretentious birth name of his daughter who had a minor role in the movie which she did, ok. So we withdraw the tenth star.
- sjensenstrad
- Dec 25, 2024
- Permalink
I've been a fan of The Count of Monte Cristo since reading the book years ago, but I've struggled to find an adaptation that truly worked for me.
The films are too short to do the story justice, and while the popular 1998 French-Italian miniseries had its charm, it feels a bit dated now and takes some liberties with the plot.
I was actually anticipating the new 2024 French film adaptation when this English TV series appeared out of nowhere (though it is still a French-Italian production).
This series is the best adaptation I've seen so far. After watching it, I can confidently say I'm less excited about the film (although three hours long, it probably still not long enough to include all story elements).
It's been a long time since I read the book and I don't remember every detail, but the series seems faithful to the story and the eight episodes give the plot room to develop. It simplifies some secondary character and story arcs, but overall, it covers much of the novel.
My only critique is that the middle episodes did get a bit convoluted, and I sometimes struggled to keep track of the three families. (To be fair, I'm terrible with names, which didn't help.)
Regardless, I highly recommend this series, whether or not you're a fan of the book. My wife, who hasn't read it, loved the series just as much-and even asked to keep watching, which is rare for her.
The films are too short to do the story justice, and while the popular 1998 French-Italian miniseries had its charm, it feels a bit dated now and takes some liberties with the plot.
I was actually anticipating the new 2024 French film adaptation when this English TV series appeared out of nowhere (though it is still a French-Italian production).
This series is the best adaptation I've seen so far. After watching it, I can confidently say I'm less excited about the film (although three hours long, it probably still not long enough to include all story elements).
It's been a long time since I read the book and I don't remember every detail, but the series seems faithful to the story and the eight episodes give the plot room to develop. It simplifies some secondary character and story arcs, but overall, it covers much of the novel.
My only critique is that the middle episodes did get a bit convoluted, and I sometimes struggled to keep track of the three families. (To be fair, I'm terrible with names, which didn't help.)
Regardless, I highly recommend this series, whether or not you're a fan of the book. My wife, who hasn't read it, loved the series just as much-and even asked to keep watching, which is rare for her.
- solemnphilosopher
- Jan 3, 2025
- Permalink
I'm extremely happy with how this series was made. Not only have they found a way to make it realistic, but they've also found a way to make the story so precise that it could have easily happened in reality. One of the few adaptations I can say is wonderful. The cast and locations are breathtaking in their authenticity.
I appreciate the fact that they changed the story just enough to make it more feasible, as compared to random. The issue with the original was always there were too many things that had to align just right for it to work. That's not the case with this series, they made it very believable.
!0/10 well done, truly fantastic work.
I appreciate the fact that they changed the story just enough to make it more feasible, as compared to random. The issue with the original was always there were too many things that had to align just right for it to work. That's not the case with this series, they made it very believable.
!0/10 well done, truly fantastic work.
Based in UK desparate to watch and lucky enough to watch on STV.
A beautiful mini series based on Alexander dumas novel. Stunning locations, architecture, music, art and most of all superb acting and directing.
Sam Claflin as Edmund/the count was absolutely hypnotic. Close up camera work on his eyes showed the pain, anger and loss of the character. Episode with Abe Faria (Jeremy Iron) was enthralling don't know where time went.
Actors playing Danglars, Vampa, Caderousse and Jacapo gave humour which I enjoyed too!
The villains of the piece played magnificently too.
A show not to be missed. I'm on my 3rd time round😁
A beautiful mini series based on Alexander dumas novel. Stunning locations, architecture, music, art and most of all superb acting and directing.
Sam Claflin as Edmund/the count was absolutely hypnotic. Close up camera work on his eyes showed the pain, anger and loss of the character. Episode with Abe Faria (Jeremy Iron) was enthralling don't know where time went.
Actors playing Danglars, Vampa, Caderousse and Jacapo gave humour which I enjoyed too!
The villains of the piece played magnificently too.
A show not to be missed. I'm on my 3rd time round😁
- hmillen-69523
- Dec 21, 2024
- Permalink
I can honestly say, that I didn't miss a second of this fantastic version of the classic tale. The cast, the direction, the locations... all of it is perfect. Nothing less. I binged it all through christmas day and now I don't know what to watch next! It's that kind of adaptation. It's that good. It's worth a second watch, and thats what I will do. Watch it again :-) If you have the chance to stream it where you live, make yourself a good cup of coffe, sit back and enjoy the story of revenge, greed, ambitions, love, hate and all that lies in between. I really recommend that you do, and remember to enjoy the caracter of Dantes/ the Count. He is so brilliantly portraied as a man with complete control of his face and his emotions.
- MoonSander
- Dec 27, 2024
- Permalink
I was hooked from the very first episode. The Jim Caviezel movie was extremely well done, but this series exceeds that masterpiece. With more time, you are able to weave more layers into this tale that requires it. The acting is almost all top shelf with a couple performances that are mediocre. The series has a solid pace and builds until episode 6. I found Episodes 7 and 8 drawn out and less than engaging. Sure, you get the ending you expect, but the magic was gone. A couple reveals in this series were far superior to the movie and a few were fer less impressive.
I 100% recommend you see this but also caution you that despite landing safely, they didn't stick it in my opinion.
I 100% recommend you see this but also caution you that despite landing safely, they didn't stick it in my opinion.
- ThatMonkey
- Dec 30, 2024
- Permalink
This series is outstanding in every respect. Certainly, one of the best adaptations of Dumas' book that I have seen in my 61 years. The fact that it's an 8-part miniseries gives the production time to properly flesh out the characters and various plot strands.
Sam Claflin leads a top-notch cast (special mention for Michele Riondino, as Jacopo, and Blake Ritson, who is wonderfully evil in everything!), and the script is excellent.
Some wonderful locations and beautiful cinematography, along with excellent original music, by Volker. Bertelmann) complete what is an epic production.
I only hope it goes on to be seen by a wide audience, as it truly deserves to be seen!
Sam Claflin leads a top-notch cast (special mention for Michele Riondino, as Jacopo, and Blake Ritson, who is wonderfully evil in everything!), and the script is excellent.
Some wonderful locations and beautiful cinematography, along with excellent original music, by Volker. Bertelmann) complete what is an epic production.
I only hope it goes on to be seen by a wide audience, as it truly deserves to be seen!
This is one of the greatest of revenge tales. Even Lew Wallace borrowed from "The Count of Monte Cristo" when he wrote "Ben-Hur" around 40 years after "Monte Cristo" was first published.
A few reviewers on here take issue with how this veers off from the book and don't give it a high rating for that reason. Every adaptation of "Monte Cristo" veers off from the book. That has to happen because the multi-faceted revenge story is complex and wasn't meant to be watched, just read. This veers off in ways that enhance the theme of this story.
This series is a great watch. We couldn't stop. We wanted to know what he was going to do next. And because there was so much irony, many scenes were surprisingly funny as Dantes' victims fell into his web.
Sam Claflin was detached, pained, clever, single-minded and charismatic, credibly portraying everything that Dantes needed to be to pull off his revenge.
A few reviewers on here take issue with how this veers off from the book and don't give it a high rating for that reason. Every adaptation of "Monte Cristo" veers off from the book. That has to happen because the multi-faceted revenge story is complex and wasn't meant to be watched, just read. This veers off in ways that enhance the theme of this story.
This series is a great watch. We couldn't stop. We wanted to know what he was going to do next. And because there was so much irony, many scenes were surprisingly funny as Dantes' victims fell into his web.
Sam Claflin was detached, pained, clever, single-minded and charismatic, credibly portraying everything that Dantes needed to be to pull off his revenge.
- ldbear-31508
- Dec 28, 2024
- Permalink
I saw several Monte Cristo adaptations. The Donat version is the most coerent, the 2002 has more passion, but can be over the top. I can't believe we get *two* 2024 Monte Cristo adaptations (one of them French), and they're both so absolutely boring. I used to like Sam Claflin, as a snarky romantic lead - all that's left of that acting is the occasional pointless eyebrow raise. I can't say that anyone except Villefort has any charm. Moaning Myrtle does a better Mercedes than Mercedes.
I'm not even going to touch the senselessness of the parliament enquiry scene (seriously, no effort to establish Haydee's identity) or the complete pointless anticlimax of the duel scene.
Here's to the other 2024 adaptation that wins 'barely interesting' by virtue of Pierre's Niney's story-inaccurate back tattoo and swim scenes. Eh.
I'm not even going to touch the senselessness of the parliament enquiry scene (seriously, no effort to establish Haydee's identity) or the complete pointless anticlimax of the duel scene.
Here's to the other 2024 adaptation that wins 'barely interesting' by virtue of Pierre's Niney's story-inaccurate back tattoo and swim scenes. Eh.
- mada-soare93
- Dec 27, 2024
- Permalink