User reviews

This movie was not garbage but, it is probably worth skipping or waiting for Netflix. You know when someone tells you a story about something crazy that happened to them and they hit the high points to get to the point and, in the end it doesn't sound that exciting at all? Sure, you nod along because you see how that could be hard or they should be upset but you feel you missed something along the way. This movie hit the high points. The emotion didn't transfer. The story makes sense. The acting is decent and the story plays out the way the trailer leads you to believe it would. There are a few moments of confusion when Darcy (Joan Allen) starts to imagine what would happen if this secret were exposed but, in the end you figure what was and what wasn't and, just generally leave with a feeling of, okay well, it is what it is.

A wife's seemingly good marriage disintegrates after she uncovers her husbands dark secret.This is a glossy thriller not unlike the plethora of them produced in the 1980's and 1990's.

The casting is good with Anthony Lapaglia suitably charming and dangerous at the same time. Joan Allen has the more difficult role as the wife struggling to come to terms with her husbands deceptions. She really shines here showing just the right amount of vulnerability mixed with strength.

Despite the by the numbers plot this still manages to be a fairly entertaining for the first half at least at which point it goes downhill to reach a disappointing climax.

This is a distinctly average production and one that won't live long in the memory.

I'm a huge Stephen King fan, the man is a genius when it comes to books. When it comes to his books becoming movies, not so much though. Don't get me wrong, some Stephan King books have translated into film's quite well, however "The Good Marriage" is not one of those.

I'll start off by saying I did not read the story that this film is based on. I'm not sure if the movie does it justice or not, I hope not though. The entire thing was just so slow and not entertaining at all. The story is very basic and really hardly goes anywhere. The acting is also pretty bad, some of the delivered lines were cringeworthy.

I really don't have much good to say about this film other than the last 15 minutes was alright. I really feel bad bashing it, because I wanted to like this movie. Just had a really really really hard time finding something to like about it.

3/10

A Good Marriage is the latest Stephen King adaptation to hit the film realm and it does so with a splat. Bland direction, hollowed performances and a lazy script propel A Good Marriage from being apart from the rest and instead it sits happily between Sleeping with the Enemy and Cape Fear. The film stars Anthony Lapaglia and Joan Allen as a happily married couple that have their lives turned upside down when the husband is discovered to be a serial killer. This film isn't a terrible film in the least. It is cliché, cookie cutter cinema rehashing what other better films have done in the past. There is nothing new to the story and honestly, it doesn't even seem like King's work. It is lazily written as if it this were meant as a made for TV movie with a slightly bigger budget and a bit more violence and language. Despite some of these negative aspects, the film is still silly entertaining fun. This is a midnight movie type, it isn't good, it isn't bad. It is a film wallowing in mediocrity and it seems to be okay with that.

This was a film that I picked up on DVD a couple years after it came out as I remember reading the short story from King and really liking it. The first time I've watched it though was on Prime when my girlfriend Jaime as she thought it sounded good and I never pass up a chance to see a movie she's interested in. The synopsis here is after 25 years of a good marriage, what will Darcy (Joan Allen) do once she discovers her husband's sinister secret?

We start this movie at a party where Bob Anderson (Anthony LaPaglia) is given an award. He does taxes and he's one of the best that works for Bill Gaines (Mike O'Malley). Also at this party is his wife Darcy, their daughter Petra (Kristen Connolly), her fiancé Vince Dorne (Will Rogers) and their son Donnie (Theo Stockman). Betty Pike (Cara Buono) who is best friends with Darcy is also in attendance. She's pretty drunk and is upset about a serial killer that is stalking the New England area.

The married couple goes home to celebrate some more. We get to see what feels like a routine for the two when they make love. Bob does have a bit of a wandering eye as he sees Betty from his window kissing someone in her garage. He's called back by his wife and as they get intimate.

They seem like a normal happy family, but there's a man who much later we learn is named Holt Ramsey (Stephen Lang). He was at the party in the beginning, watching them and is also been staking out the house.

Bob is into collecting rare antique coins and does a lot of traveling to try to find more as well as for work. Darcy is watching television and a graphic horror movie is on. She's freaked out, but the remote won't work. She goes out to the garage to try to find a new battery. She knocks over a magazine to find some she's been looking for. She also discovers that her husband has a fetish she didn't know about. There's something much more sinister hiding behind the boxes. There's a nook with a little box that contains an ID of the recently found murdered woman along with a couple other cards with her name on it.

Is her husband is this notorious serial killer named Beadie. Darcy has to decide what she will do next. He calls her and notices that she's been crying. There's not a lot of time and a lot has to be considered and makes you think, what would you do if you were in her position?

I knew coming in that I had read this King short story as I believe at the time of writing this is the last book of his shorts that has come out. This one intrigued me that King based this off of the BTK Killer, who also lived a double life where his family and church had no idea what he was doing. Now that one plays out differently than the real life story. What I like is the moral dilemma this poses which that sparked conversation between Jaime and I afterwards. I don't recall the story playing out like the film does as from what I remember, it ends pretty soon after Darcy finds the secret. I could be wrong there though.

Now I really want to delve into what you'd do if you discovered your significant other is a murderer. There's the moral obligation to turn them in, because if you don't, they could continue to kill and that would be on you as an accomplice. On the other side, like in the case here, Darcy and Bob have been married for 25 years. They have two successful children that have lives of their own. This could set a domino of effects that could ruin them, even though they had nothing to do with it. When I asked Jaime, she straight away said she'd turn me in. I played devil's advocate, but I probably would to.

There's another layer to this in that Bob has gotten away with what's he has been doing for so long that he has to be a master manipulator. The lines that he feeds to his wife, make her wonder if she can trust him to do what he promises he will. There's also that fear in the back of her mind that you can't fully trust them after the betrayal of being kept in the dark for so long.

Shifting this over to the pacing, it runs 102 minutes long. I never got bored with it, so I didn't really have any issues there. I do think that there probably was a bit that could have been cut from it to get it down to 90 minutes to be honest. I'm going by the old adage here that the first 90 are free and you need to convince me for anything over that. There's a bit of filler in my eyes to trim from it. I do like where it ends up and how this ordeal changes Darcy.

Speaking of which, the acting of this movie I thought was good. This is really a vehicle for Allen as our lead with LaPaglia there as a secondary, but important driver to the story. Allen's performance as Darcy was good. I feel horrible for her with what she discovers and coming to terms with what she has to do in order to survive. She also has to keep in mind her children as she's a really good mother. I do see shade of my mother in her to be honest. LaPaglia I thought was good as well. He establishes the norm for his character and then we get to see the darkside of it. That works very well for me. Lang, Buono, Connolly and the rest of the cast do round this out for what was needed as well in shaping these two stars.

That will take me to the effects of the movie which there really aren't a lot actually. The only time I can think is at the climax of the movie where Darcy comes to terms with what she has to do. There are pictures of the victims from Beadie, which they did a really good job with making them look realistic. We do get Darcy having to deal with things in her mind that we see play out. That did work for me and I'd say that the cinematography was solid as well.

Now with that said, this is a movie that poses an interesting question of what you'd do in this person's position. It also shows us something that really did happen and that we truly don't know someone like we think we do. The movie does run a bit long, but not enough to ruin what we got or get boring. I thought he acting was good. We don't get a lot in the way of effects, but we also don't necessarily need them. The soundtrack didn't really stand out to me and it also didn't hurt the movie either. They do use a lot of older songs that fit more to our main characters when they younger. Overall though I'd say this is an above average movie in my opinion. I'd recommend this for horror and non-horror fans alike as well.

This film commits the one unpardonable sin that no "thriller" should ever make. It's simply boring. There's no atmosphere, the characterization is ridiculous, the tension is weak, the performances are pedestrian, and the thrills, such as they are, are very few and far between.

Stephen King should be much better than this.

I read the story before I saw the movie and although there were some changes to the script that I thought were not improvements, I was still surprised to see the film was enjoyable and was a great psychological exploration of what a woman in that horrible dilemma might go through. The story is not about the horrors of serial killers or the supernatural horrors one might expect from King but its about the emotional horror of choosing to live with a secret of unimaginable bearing. I think that the reason many people think this is boring is because that idea went right over their heads. Watch the film amd read the story. Both are great!

If you're not looking for cheap thrills and gore, but for low key, understated terror, this is a very good film, with a fantastic couple of leads. LaPaglia is terrifying in his everyday life dull character of the boring accountant and obsessive husband. Allen is also magnificent in her calm, subdued development as a character. I think the low scores are from people expecting a roller coaster unrealistic scary movie with lots of blood and screams. Nothing like this here, rather the little music of human perversity sounding like a distant radio. I love the ending, the power of resilience of so many women.

I was disappointed to read that the screenplay for this was actually written by Stephen King himself. I was entirely ready to chastise whoever had adapted his novella because, ironically, it felt nothing like a King movie whatsoever. Compared to another 2014 King adaption from the same collection of short stories 'Big Driver', which had King's signatures written all over it, this just came across flat, uninspired and lazy. The theme of both of those films is 'Girl Power' but only one truly encapsulated it for me and it certainly wasn't this one.

The main problem that comes to mind over this film is just how dull it is. The casting choices are about as uninspired as you'll ever get, the script just drags on and on and there are enough "it's all a dream" moments for a decades worth of movies let alone one. The character of Bob would have to be the most boring serial killer I've ever seen in a movie. There was absolutely no edge to the character and even the stalking scenes just don't feel the least bit threatening. All of this does unfortunately come back to the script written by King. The man can write a fine book but maybe he should leave the screenplays alone for the time being.

If you never watched this movie, you wouldn't miss much. The storyline was very tepid. No build up at all, just jumping from scene to scene, and you just have to accept what happens. No character build-up, so you never get invested in anyone. The biggest lapse was the missing fear and anticipation you typically expect from a Stephen King style story. You keep waiting for the twist that never comes. I gave it three stars because the main actors did act well with the shallow script given to them. In summary, I'd say move on to the next one.

Then again, this is from the mind of Stephen King, so what do I know, right? That's a good question actually. Let's establish that while I know it is based on a short story by King, I have not read said short story. So can't compare or rate based on that.

That aside, the movie is quite good. Not just the actors (really well chosen), but how it was made. To get inside the mind of someone is not an easy thing - to visualize that and to keep the viewer interested. Because not all that is seen, actually is real. Well duh, I know this is a movie, so actually and literally nothing of what you see is true. But you know what I mean or rather will when you watch this. Well made and tension filled ... even if I have issues with characters and choices ... but that is just the way it is

A couple have enjoyed a close and loving marriage for 25 years and celebrate their anniversary with their family. While the husband (Anthony La Paglia) is away on business, Darcy (Joan Allen) begins to suspect and discovers that her husband is a notorious serial killer. As well as keeping up the pretence, she is unsure of her next move.

Scripted by Stephen King from his own short story, an interesting idea gives way to some rather hackneyed execution with some typical over the top cat and mouse violence so typical of the genre.

To me this movie just kind of existed. It wasn't terrible by any means but I kept waiting for some twist or shock (other than the obvious) and one never came. The acting was good, the dialogue was fine, but a lack of suspense is what kept me from giving this movie a higher rating. It's still worth a watch though.

I was SO excited to see this adaptation after reading it in Full Dark, No Stars - boy, was I disappointed.

I even told my mother, who is and has been a massive Stephen King fan probably as long as I've been alive, not to bother, that it was a serious disappointment.

I also feel that it was dreadfully miscast. In the beginning of the book, Stephen King made sure we knew what a good man Bob is - didn't do that enough in the movie. Plus, I don't think Anthony LaPaglia makes a very good Bob.

Yeah, the movie definitely doesn't portray Bob as a nice guy, more like a smarmy used car salesman. Disappoint.

Shame, really.

As a fan of King's work : A Good Marriage brought to life was no disappointment. Characteractors Darcy & Bob Anderson played by: (Darcy) Joan Allen (Bob ) Anthony LaPaglia perfect for the roles.

This really comes across as a TV movie. There is nothing special about it. The styling is very much 'stepford wives' in that it portrays a perfect American family, a perfect marriage that others are envious of. No hair out of place, a couple who have been married 25 years yet still have sex, still love each other and take pride in how they look.

That all comes to a screeching halt when Darcy stumbles across the fact that her husband is a serial killer.

My thoughts are that this film is watchable but I wouldn't rate it as particularly good. It's passable at best.