The Stone Roses: Made of Stone
- 2013
- 1h 37m
IMDb RATING
7.2/10
2.8K
YOUR RATING
Shane Meadows documents the reunion of iconic British band, The Stone Roses.Shane Meadows documents the reunion of iconic British band, The Stone Roses.Shane Meadows documents the reunion of iconic British band, The Stone Roses.
- Awards
- 1 nomination
Photos
Éric Cantona
- Self
- (uncredited)
Liam Gallagher
- Self
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Featured review
2011. After 15+ years apart, the original members of iconic English band The Stone Roses - Ian Brown, John Squire, Alan "Reni" Wren and Gary "Mani" Mounfield - reform for a concert tour. Enlisting the film-making talents of director Shane Meadows (This is England, Dead Man's Shoes, A Room for Romeo Brass) this film documents their reunion, including initial meetings, practice sessions and the concerts themselves. There is also coverage of their 80/90s history.
More concert film than documentary, not that this is a bad thing. While there was decent coverage of how they burst on the scene, including media coverage and a good feeling of how big they were, there is very little on why their ascent faltered after the first album or why things went south after their second album. This is a notable omission, as the lack of success, or even musical production, of The Stone Roses after their brilliant debut album is one of music's greatest tragedies.
However, the music coverage is great. Fantastic music, as you would already know if you are a Stone Roses fan, well-performed, well- recorded and produced. I am generally not a fan of bands reforming after many years apart - they generally lack the passion of younger bands, have nothing new to offer and seem to be only in it for the money. However, the music here is great - no rustiness, no going through the motions, no cynicism. It's as if it's 1989 all over again.
More concert film than documentary, not that this is a bad thing. While there was decent coverage of how they burst on the scene, including media coverage and a good feeling of how big they were, there is very little on why their ascent faltered after the first album or why things went south after their second album. This is a notable omission, as the lack of success, or even musical production, of The Stone Roses after their brilliant debut album is one of music's greatest tragedies.
However, the music coverage is great. Fantastic music, as you would already know if you are a Stone Roses fan, well-performed, well- recorded and produced. I am generally not a fan of bands reforming after many years apart - they generally lack the passion of younger bands, have nothing new to offer and seem to be only in it for the money. However, the music here is great - no rustiness, no going through the motions, no cynicism. It's as if it's 1989 all over again.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- The Stone Roses: Isklesani od kamena
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $784,111
- Runtime1 hour 37 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Stone Roses: Made of Stone (2013) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer