9 reviews
Amateur hour. The writing is the main problem. It's stupefying and generic. Can't tell if the actors are any good because even if they were Oscar winners they would have problems reading life into these color-by-number, 2-dimensional characters. The conspiracy theory in this movie is uninspired, intellectually lazy and far-fetched. This film is a couple steps above a student project as it appears they had the budget to do some nice location shooting. There's not much of a backstory to the lead characters whereas they would have benefited by this by becoming more likable to the audience. More than anything this film reminds me of movies made for a Christian audience except focused on hitting the Fed as being the evil mover behind the modern economy.
I could take this movie, add an A list cast, improve the editing, and add to the story - in it's present form it felt like it was dubbed in places.
- eqmanson-68588
- Aug 8, 2017
- Permalink
- sxtal-60797
- Oct 28, 2017
- Permalink
The premise of this movie sounded really good and being a fan of thrillers, I thought this was a must watch. Wrong. The acting was so bad it was impossible to get involved in the plot. On top of that, the total lack of subtlety when something secretive or dangerous was about to happen made the movie look very amateurish - which is obviously is. There is not much more I can write about it as I only watched it for twenty minutes. I just could not take any more of it.
- genemstablet
- Sep 15, 2017
- Permalink
Creed of Gold is a GREAT, action-packed film for the family. With the many re-makes and junk Mainstream Hollywood is producing, this film is refreshing. I hope to see the actors in other projects, specifically the Leading lady and Sidekick. All the cast and crew have a promising future in entertainment.
Side note: The film could've been shorter... The writing had an amateurish feel at times, but the quirks made up for it. Sometimes a writer can get ahead of the budget. If you don't have the finances or time, cut back on the story. Works for a younger audience 12-18. I give it a 7.5.
Side note: The film could've been shorter... The writing had an amateurish feel at times, but the quirks made up for it. Sometimes a writer can get ahead of the budget. If you don't have the finances or time, cut back on the story. Works for a younger audience 12-18. I give it a 7.5.
Fair enough it hasn't got the big budget of Spielberg and Nolan but for what they had it worked. And once you get into it, it's a great film you won't be able to stop watching