User reviews

Has compelling experts, credible sounding testimonies, and great methods for capturing evidence.

Problems: THE MUSIC! They play music over what the researchers are supposedly hearing during the investigation. Would love to hear what they're hearing without that stupid music.

They play through the evidence way too quickly for the viewer to judge for him or herself.

No repeat trial techniques. Some techniques seemed to produce results but they don't repeat as necessary for credibility.

Everytime they walk into forest they wonder why it goes silent...not realising THEY are the reason why creatures go silent !!! Arrrrrgggghhhh!!! my god that makes me so mad.

While I do enjoy the show, I wonder how Dr. Mayor is always wearing pristine clothes and has her hair and makeup done after sleeping in a tent on a riverbank all night. Just makes it seem more staged.

And the 'What the (bleep)' gets old.

Although I enjoy watching the show. Please stop playing the music , it drowns out what you say you actual heard. I appreciate you letting me review this show.

First I need to say kudos to Zac (cameraman) who follows Russell into the creepiest places. You can clearly hear the hesitation in his voice, but he does it anyway. Yes he's getting paid, but no amount of money would get me to follow Russell. He always seems to find the weirdest and creepiest places. Braver than I would be. All that being said, there seems to be great comradeship between these two. I'd happily watch a programme with Russell and Zac.

What I like about this programme is there's a mixture of believers (Ronnie), sceptics (Russell) and only science will prove it attitude (Meriya) and Bryce who is at the helm, finding the locations and interviewing eye witnesses. I'd rather see a program that will try and find alternatives to what is out there, but when the unexplained happens and science has no answer, it gives a more authentic feel to the entire programme.

I've watched other programmes on Bigfoot, but for me, none come close to this one. If anyone can find them, I believe they will.

For too long the human race has believed they are superior and there can't possibly be any other entity out there. It would be naive to think, with the vast universe, that we are the only intelligent species living. I do believe that there are far more advanced, living beings out there and programmes like this that use science as one of their tools, are first class and can one day, unearth the truth regarding visitors to earth.

When I go hunting, I dont advertise to the thing I'm hunting for that I am there by using flashlights. How do these people never use the right equipment at the right time. We will never see a "bigfoot"!!

I am a Bigfoot enthusiast and have been reading up on everything Bigfoot for about 10 years now. That said, I'm not gullible, or am I ? Finding Bigfoot (FB) was an interesting program for anyone interested in the subject of BF. it was widely popular and was on for how many seasons ? 10 ? I enjoyed the cast and all the various locations they went to to try and find BF. The most frustrating thing about FB was the little time they put in at any one location. Plus, it was pretty obvious that Matt and Bobo were not in the physical shape required to do any real "off the grid" backcountry hiking. Thus, they didn't have much success because they didn't go very deep in to the back country. Let's face it, they really didn't find much "Evidence" in 10 seasons.

I like the premise from the start that Expedition Bigfoot took. The advanced use of technology!! Three weeks isn't enough time to remain in an area either, but it was far better than the 1-2 nights that FB did. The other thing was they had a more qualified cast, and FAR LESS ANNOYING ! No one is more irritating than the "know it all blow hard Matt Moneymaker!". With Expedition Bigfoot, at least they have a survivalist and a primatologist cast member ! I thought that was a big step in the right direction and instantly gave them more credibility! The amount of evidence collected was truly remarkable. Let's review their findings in 8 short episodes; Audio Evidence, Outline of image from game cam, twig snaps, loud impact steps heard, bigfoot nest, hair sample, foot print, tree breaks, Red eyes (what I thought most impressive), Orbs, thermal blob white heat signature, great thermal footage of BF, and Whistles.... THAT's A LOT OF EVIDENCE !!! Especially for a single season. And then it hit me..... Not only was that a lot of potential evidence, but that was an incredible amount of VARYING evidence. So think, if you were trying to convince the viewer that BF is real, what would you want to do ? Collect as much evidence as possible and collect a bunch of varying kinds of evidence. The Goal ? To get you program renewed for more seasons ! St the end of the first season when you add it all up.... The viewer says "They really made a good case with all the evidence gathered that BF is real." And "Yes, I tune in to see if they find even more next season".

But....At the conclusion of the last episode It hit me... IT's JUST TOO CONVENIENT !they found all that varying types of evidence. Yes the FB cast were horrible researchers, but in 10 seasons, they didn't even come close to what Expedition Bigfoot found in a mere 3 weeks (a single season of 8 episodes) There is a reason for this... EXPEDITION BIGFOOT FAKED ALL THE EVIDENCE ! The variety of evidence was clearly scripted. As much as I enjoyed every episode, and thought they were using techniques that could produce quality evidence... I forgot something... This is entertainment, not a National Geographic program. Let me ask you this... Did you catch the other Animal Planet show a few years back...."Mermaids, the body found" ! I thought this was a real show that had uncovered real evidence. Later, as many viewers did... we found out that we were duped and this was called a "Docu-Drama". Well, Expedition Bigfoot is similar to that show in a way. Remember, if a new show has any chance to survive, they needed to show the viewer far more evidence than FB did right ? Wasn't that the biggest complaint about FB ? So they did what any TV show would do to give themselves the best chance to have additional seasons. They gave the audience just that.... A whole bunch of evidence ! Problem is... It just wasn't honest and real evidence...

I usually avoid these shows like the plague. They Normally have scripted actors, set up reconstructions and lots of padding.

This is a fun show, the guys on it have real actual credentials and history. Bryce in general is a legend (death valley ! What show !!) I found the episodes interesting, always leave you wanting to know what happens next.

Whether you flat out don't believe Bigfoot or UFOs or whatever this show definitely creeps you out at times and does make you think. Obviously there is a lot of slick editing but I enjoyed it and would recommend it for the casual TV watcher and definitely for the paranormal/conspiracy community.

Keep it up Bryce !!

While Mireya Mayor actual qualifications, Ronnie Le Blanc really cheapens the show. Every movement, every sound in that huge forest represents a Bigfoot to him. And a cloaked Bigfoot at that... Isn't it possible that whistle was an owl or that snapping twig was a deer or maybe a dozen other animals that live in the forest. The wide-ranging technology is interesting to watch, but Ronnie's constant assumption that Bigfoot is lurking is just too much.

These so-called researchers couldn't find cow at a dairy farm. The science is as fictional as the Finding Bigfoot nonsense. It's just astonishing they find nothing in the forest at night while they crash around with flashlights and walkie-talkies. The tension and drama are more fake than the evidence they purport to uncover. How do these guys keep a straight face when doing their lines? It's unlikely but there might be something out in the wilderness but please, these guys will not be the ones to document it. Don't waste your time unless you are just bored to death.

I don't understand why there's so many negative comments. Of all the Bigfoot shows I've watched, this one I think has been one of the best. They don't just go around whooping and hollering and banging on trees, they have real technology that they're using. Sometimes I question their tactics, but I know it is part of getting viewers to watch the show. Either way, I look forward to watching it every week.

Did you hear that? It's a Bigfoot! Do you smell that? Has to be a Bigfoot. But..... it's not. Can't even find a dead one!! Easter bunny?? Maybe.

I want to be objective and open-minded when it comes to Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti, having studied Cryptozoology myself. I'm going to say that this series tries to add more of a "research" feel to it, but it fails on many fronts. I only watch it because of Dr. Mayor. I believe she is doing her best to stay the course of science. The survivalist strikes me as a man that has at least a center to him when it comes to what he's doing. By and large, true research and actual science is lacking. Too many quick conclusions based on spurious and anecdotal accounts. When hard "evidence" is found, the results are by and large inconclusive. I'm not sure if they are ghost-hunting or doing scientific research.

Using an algorithm that shows where the animal should be during a certain timeframe & then to putting people in that 1 area for a multi-week expedition is a great idea, as opposed to waiting for someone in the public to report a sighting & then flocking to that area. Using the algorithm to get the best chance of getting & being there at the same time as the animal is a great foundation, as well as using people who have nature & wild animal experience outside of the bigfoot community such as Accord & Dr. Mireya.

It's refreshing to see such a cross functional team explore this subject matter. If you haven't seen season two yet, definitely check it out. The amount of data that they collected and the effort that they went through to do so is quite impressive.

Actually a better show than any of the others.

Bad reviews are most likely coming from those 1 episodes basement dwelling watchers.. For me they've caught some really crazy videos like other shows haven't. Jesus, Lake Fear area was wild..They've come closer than any show I've watched..Great Show Guys don't listen to the bad reviews and keep up the good work...tyty.

If I did believe in Bigfoot, this team would make me change my mind. Yes, they're that goofy. I'm still not sure why I watched it. Everything is a sign of Bigfoot. I'm not sure who's more ridiculous, Ronny or Russell.

Dr Mayer must have really needed the money to be involved in this hot mess. She tries to be objective. I would never enter the woods with these buffoons, especially Ronny. And Bryce, who never gets his hands dirty, just takes witness accounts at face value. Everything is true as long as it fits his narrative. The only reason I gave this 3 stars is the unintentional laughs I get.

Look if you don't believe in Bigfoot and want to hate, then don't watch.

Love everyone on the show and what they bring to it.

I enjoy all of it and I can't wait for more.

Personally, I like this show. This is because I am out in the thick and islolated forests of California, myself. Every now and then, I get the distinct feeling I am / was being watched - A part of my intuition which is mostly right, when it comes to humans. But here's the catch: I, or me and friends, were the only ones in the area, at these times. This happened once when the sun was coming down, for sure.

At first, I was a sceptic of the existence of Bigfoot - However, I believe too much is going on. I am a weightlifer, looking fairly muscular, standing at 240 pounds, 6 ft. 2. Maybe this is why rocks weren't thrown (Although this last part, ofcourse I will never be sure of). Besides, it's not like Sasquatch has ever been spotted out in the deserts to the east.

Those that claim from behind a keyboard or smartphone all this is false - I'd say come in with an open mind. The existence of fairly large squids was indeed denied at first, untill they too, recently washed up ashore. The Gimlin Patterson creature looks the same as other Bigfoots recorded over the (recent) decades - Of which sharp(er) recorded material actually exists.

Personally, I welcome a show like this one, especially with scientists onboard. Yes, producers have to follow rules of commercialisation. However, on the other hand, this group of people is taking the initiative, going out there, and in part trying to get the afore mentioned scientific answers. To me, I say - Keep up the great work. Keep going, ignore the naysayers, untill a point in the future where the existence of Bigfoot can finally be scientifically proven (Or debunked, ofcourse - Although personally, I am leaning towards the existence of a Bigfoot species).

They've set up an area allegedly teaming with Bigfoots. Everything is presented as new ground breaking "we're the first to...." stuff and so far I've seen nothing that I've not seen before.

It is interesting their bear "expert" saw not one, but 3 bears where none have been seen in many years. Of course the cameras were turned off so WE don't see bears.

Lots of "first time interviews" that can easily be debunked by googling the people who've never talked before and seeing they have talked for years!

You can't get away with claims like this anymore.

You don't even need to look these things up on the net. An example is they have a guy out exploring alone and he's going by tree stumps on his walk while the narrator is saying he's in a place "so inaccessible to humans", so apparently the Bigfoots are logging?

One interesting thing was watching a guy clearly driving and talking on his cell phone illegally, right up to his ear! Not once, but through several episodes. That was revealing. I never saw that one before on a TV show.

Russel "solo" repels down what is described as a long way down. There's a camera person set up on the opposite side in several shots? As he's "solo" repelling with all the drama and whatnot. Also the repel literally looked to be no more than 100 feet. But they're calling it 450. That's 45 story building they're estimating.

Conclusion: this is all dramatic Bull crap. I'm almost positive these people are right off a highway and just faking their asses off. They do a few shots of camping, and go to their hotel each night.

Another thing they're doing is constantly repeating themselves after a commercial break to fill time. They're spending five minutes alone recapping footage and audio of the last episode before doing this.

"Hey I know, let's turn on the car lights, really make the camera wobble and bring UFO's into the next episode!"

Folks it's pretty sad when I'm yearning for Finding Bigfoot episode instead of this crap. At least they're funny.

Awesome show. Kids and I look forward to it all week! Love the dynamic between Russell, Ronnie, and Mireya! Incredibly entertaining and fun. Also, Zak is the 4th team member for sure!!!

This is a guilty pleasure show, just like oak island they drag out the show for years and discover nothing they stomp around at night and then wonder why they dont find anything/ the acting is horrendous. Why are they walking around with torches when everything could be done with night vision goggles ?

Why aren't they putting cameras in many locations and waiting, because it doesn't make good tv

the presenters have no interest in finding big foot as their employment stops. They need to drag it out as much as possible

it a con but a fun watch.

The show is weird because they create false excitement and then it goes instantly flat

why have they not hired actual trackers to trach the big foots ?

At first I really liked this, then it got so annoying when they would get so close then run the opposite direction. What!? Really?! You are there to find them, not run every time you supposedly see them. How stupid. One is either too uncomfortable with the situation so they tell everyone to leave, or they just get too scared and run..so stupid. They are there to find them, not run everytime they think they see them. Just really annoying, and makes me think it is faked.