Rejoined
- Episode aired Oct 30, 1995
- TV-14
- 45m
IMDb RATING
7.0/10
2.4K
YOUR RATING
Lenara Kahn, the new host of the wife of Dax's former host Torias, comes to the station. While they're not allowed to renew their relation, there's still a spark.Lenara Kahn, the new host of the wife of Dax's former host Torias, comes to the station. While they're not allowed to renew their relation, there's still a spark.Lenara Kahn, the new host of the wife of Dax's former host Torias, comes to the station. While they're not allowed to renew their relation, there's still a spark.
Cirroc Lofton
- Jake Sisko
- (credit only)
Ken Marshall
- Michael Eddington
- (as Kenneth Marshall)
Patrick Barnitt
- Bajoran Officer
- (uncredited)
Kevin M. Brettauer
- Bajoran Boy
- (uncredited)
Randy James
- Jones
- (uncredited)
Robin Morselli
- Bajoran Officer
- (uncredited)
Karlotta Nelson
- Bajoran Civilian
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaSusanna Thompson, who plays Lenara Kahn, would later play the Borg Queen in several episodes of Star Trek: Voyager (1995).
- GoofsDuring the reception, Sisko mentions that they are trying to create "the galaxy's first artificial wormhole", but it has been established in previous episodes that the Bajoran wormhole is itself artificial.
- Quotes
Major Kira Nerys: What do Klingons dream about?
Worf: Things that would send cold chills down your spine, and wake you in the middle of the night. It is better you do not know. Excuse me.
[leaves]
Major Kira Nerys: I can never tell when he's joking.
- ConnectionsFeatured in What We Left Behind: Looking Back at Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (2018)
- SoundtracksStar Trek: Deep Space Nine - Main Title
(uncredited)
Written by Dennis McCarthy
Performed by Dennis McCarthy
Featured review
One of the oddities of this series is that the writers/creators managed to introduce a truly interesting concept, the Trill/symbiote relationship, but never seemed to be able to explore it in a particularly interesting fashion. Instead, we're given a slightly bland character (Jadzia never seemed to show any real nuance other than being a very attractive woman who was good at her job and was willing to slum it on occasion) with vaguely soap opera-ish storylines. This was a disservice to the inherent potential of the character because the concept practically screamed "hidden depths." While this was not the worst use of this tendency toward soap opera (that would be her ridiculous willingness to throw everything away for a man she barely knew on a transdimensional planet) but it hardly makes her character arc as interesting as those of the other credited leads on the show. Granted, there was some consistency -- she was willing to kill her symbiote permanently for an ex- she seemed to be fond of. But there was really no reason given that made the entire fatalism credible. Nothing in the series or in this particular episode suggested any reason her passion for this particular ex- was so overwhelming as to lead to such an end, and, ultimately, this episode, like the aforementioned transdimensional planet one, was vaguely insulting to the character. They had this concept with such enormous potential and spend much of their time making her an irrational and shallow creature. We should expect better from a Star Trek series.
Incidentally, the whole "exile from Trill, permanent death of symbiote" plotline was simply ludicrous in light of everything we've been told about the Trill and their adulation of the symbiote. They don't want to encourage the symbiotes to fall back into old patterns. I get that. But presenting it as a reason to kill off a symbiote when they clearly revere symbiotes is irrational in the extreme. Discouraging such relationships, making it difficult and outright unpleasant for joined Trills to engage in them? That makes sense. But killing them off permanently for such an indiscretion? Ridiculous. The relationship wouldn't be causing actual harm, and the society would not be in danger because of them. It's very much throwing the baby out with the bathwater, and doesn't fit in with anything we've been told about Trill society and its relationship with the symbiotes. This particular plotline therefore sounds incredibly contrived just to give the episode a source of tension. It's just bad writing and someone should have said something when the story was pitched. A good writer could have introduced the idea as simply something that was actively discouraged and had social repercussions without diminishing the resultant tension.
Incidentally, the whole "exile from Trill, permanent death of symbiote" plotline was simply ludicrous in light of everything we've been told about the Trill and their adulation of the symbiote. They don't want to encourage the symbiotes to fall back into old patterns. I get that. But presenting it as a reason to kill off a symbiote when they clearly revere symbiotes is irrational in the extreme. Discouraging such relationships, making it difficult and outright unpleasant for joined Trills to engage in them? That makes sense. But killing them off permanently for such an indiscretion? Ridiculous. The relationship wouldn't be causing actual harm, and the society would not be in danger because of them. It's very much throwing the baby out with the bathwater, and doesn't fit in with anything we've been told about Trill society and its relationship with the symbiotes. This particular plotline therefore sounds incredibly contrived just to give the episode a source of tension. It's just bad writing and someone should have said something when the story was pitched. A good writer could have introduced the idea as simply something that was actively discouraged and had social repercussions without diminishing the resultant tension.
- GreyHunter
- Jul 28, 2019
- Permalink
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content