User reviews

I have read some of the different opinions here and I concede that some of the points made could be relevant to this film. Most modern films do very little for me (I've been filmgoing since the 1950's) but I really enjoyed this film immensely with the possible exception of the way the "situation" was resolved in the end. However, most people could probably think of a hundred ways to end this one so I accept the one chosen. The acting was first class, Seamus Deasy's photography was spot on and Stephen McKeon's wonderful score raised it all a notch or two. What a refreshing break from the ear-bashing, grossly offensive noise that passes for film music these days. I give it 7 because, quite simply, I enjoyed it and that's what counts in the end, not who didn't speak very well, who was or wasn't liked in it and how bad Irish society is today.

I recently saw this at the 2007 Palm Springs International Film Festival for it's North American premiere. Director/writer John Boorman has had a very sporadic directorial career making only 15 feature length films between 1965 and 2006 including this, his latest offering. Boorman has rarely enjoyed the success that struck early in his career with such films as Point Blank, Hell in the Pacific and his biggest to date Deliverance. This time around Boorman has delivered a black comedy set in Ireland where Liam O'Leary (Brendan Gleesan) plays a wealthy real estate developer who's new found wealth has come through hard work and determination but is also costing him a loveless marriage to his wife Jane (Kim Catrell), an indifferent rebellious son Connor (real-life son Brian Gleeson), and he is overextended with his bank and battling with a rival developer and flirting with a nervous breakdown. Liam begins to think he is going mad when he starts seeing his double. Gleeson is very good in the double role of Liam and his double. Catrall drifts in and out of an Irish accent but it's not that pronounced of an accent to begin with to be bothersome to the viewer or detracting from the story. Brian Gleeson turns in a fine first screen debut. This is not a great film and not without it's flaws but it's got some great peripheral support players in the cast and good story with some witty moments. I liked it. It's got kind of a 1940's Hollywood B movie quality to it although set in modern times. I would give it a 7.5 out of 10 and it's worth a look.

Weaving in philosophical quandaries of doppelganger definitions of self with taut suspense and scathing social commentary, writer/director John Boorman's latest film dripped with promise. And while this may have been a promise superseded by the film's overambitious reach, The Tiger's Tail proves an entertaining amalgamation, despite the frequent creative misfires.

Boasting an intriguing premise, the film is at its strongest when dealing with the central plot thread of a wealthy Irish businessman (Gleeson) having his comfortable life usurped by his violently unpredictable twin (also Gleeson), falling into destitution in the process. This effective, almost Hitchcockian thriller toying with notions of doppelgangers, sense of self and definition of identity makes for a sturdy start, which sadly ends all too soon, falling short of the taut suspense piece it could have been. After this central storyline has run its course, the film begins to waver, jerking around with contrived plot twists and becoming somewhat of a confused muddle before culminating in a genuinely unorthodox if unsatisfying ending. Imbalance is the word of choice as the film's tone and plot flip-flop throughout, stuffing in as much social critique into the narrative as possible and slathering everything on rather thickly, from the central theme of the rich/poor divide (though whether Ireland's is truly the most dramatically so in all of Europe, as the film states is questionable) to the soaring crescendo of dramatic music, while underplaying the development of other intriguing plot threads (O'Leary seems oddly unsurprised by the unnerving discovery of his secret sordid past) to underwhelming effect.

However, director Boorman excels in his less than flattering, darkly satirical depiction of contemporary Dublin: indeed "a land Joyce would hardly recognize" and a far cry from the country's usual romanticized cinematic portrayals. Boorman's Dublin is a rank, filthy place more akin to the worst days of New York, filled with poverty, destitution, endless traffic, street-fights and vomiting teens - a city who would whimsically release their entire supply of non-violent mental patients onto the street to cut costs, in one of the film's most staggering lapses in judgement. An ode to the city's culture this isn't, but an intriguing cinematic cry for change it is. But in the end, despite the noticeably flawed delivery, the film proves a consistently entertaining watch, never slowing down enough to become anything less than enjoyable, if slightly frantically so.

Brendan Gleeson shines in a much needed starring role, wonderfully essaying both the grimly successful businessman and his shady identical twin with convincing distinctions and charisma to spare. However, the horrifyingly miscast Kim Cattrall easily proves the film's weakest point, her performance as consistently unconvincing as her shriekingly insulting attempt at an Irish accent. From her wobbling between unsatisfied wife to vacant shopaholic, to her never once reacting to the events surrounding her in a convincing fashion, coming as low as succumbing to attempted rape with sordid glee, Cattrall's performance and character scream of every shade of wrong. Briain Gleeson, real life son of star Brendan is an endearing and amusing presence as the protagonist's communist enthusiast son, even if he lacks the necessary exposition to jump from being wryly cynical to melodramatically disenchanted with life. Ciarán Hinds is a charming addition as a well meaning priest, and Sinéad Cusack does her best to keep herself from veering over the top in a laughably poorly written role as the mysterious family member connected to both O'Leary and his dark counterpart.

However imbalanced and overambitious the film may be, overlooking character and narrative development for over-obvious social critique, The Tiger's Tail remains a uniquely entertaining anomaly in spite of itself, anchored by a well deserved star turn by Gleeson. While hardly one of the strongest pieces of Irish cinema to emerge of late, the film remains an enjoyable and intriguing watch for those willing to side-step its frequently flawed delivery.

-6/10

I swear...John Boorman is always interesting. Here's another film of his from his later career that doesn't really work, but gosh darn it, I want to like it. I don't quite think it's good, but there's so much that just so darn interesting about it that it fascinates me quite a bit. Boorman is obviously a very intelligent man with a lot on his mind. I just wish that he more frequently used better writing partners because he alone often has trouble organizing things dramatically because this was one draft away, a draft concentrating on almost nothing but reorganization and structure, from something perhaps really special.

Liam O'Leary (Brendan Gleeson) is a real estate developer (shades of Where the Heart Is off the bat) in contemporary Dublin (meaning about 2006) who has hit a professional snag in that he's purchased land for a new project, a national soccer stadium, and he can't get all the right permits in line to account for his forty-five million euro loan (seriously, Where the Heart Is). Accepting an award for his enterprising spirit, he encourages his audience of fellow entrepreneurs to lean on government officials to let him build. His wife Jane (Kim Cattrall) loves him, though she feels distant from him. His son Conner (Brian Gleeson) is a Marxist who angrily quotes Marx and Lenin at his capitalistic father while happily taking his money and living in his opulent house. He's a man of concerns who gets little peace at home despite all his hard work to make it a good one. Suddenly, he starts seeing a doppelganger around him. First in his car in traffic, and then outside his house, and then outside the award ceremony where he gives chase, the doppelganger having seemingly mystical abilities to escape notice from anyone other than Liam.

This early section is surprisingly dominated by some rather hardcore melodramatics with Liam using the existence of his doppelganger to figure out that his mother is not his mother, instead his sister Oona (Sinead Cusack) is actually his mother, and the truth has been hidden from him since birth. Also, Oona had twins, gave birth to them in England, and came back to Dublin with only Liam. The other is obviously the doppelganger. Is all of this necessary? From a strictly narrative information point of view...maybe? Really, it could have been revealed less melodramatically at the very least. Once all of this information is out, though, things move into a more interesting direction.

The doppelganger starts stealing Liam's identity, culminating in Liam confronting him in front of his house, leading to a chase where the doppelganger is able to switch places with him, using Liam's insistence on the existence of a doppelganger that no one believed in his favor to have everyone instantly turn on Liam, making them think that Liam is the doppelganger. That's decent thriller mechanics right there, and the whole build up to it as the doppelganger is just out of sight, or sitting on Liam's boat, knowing he's in sight, with a young woman he plans to bed, ensuring the world knows it, is really solid stuff. However, we can see the standard Boorman pileup of ideas already forming. The capitalism vs. Communism debate between Liam and Conner that started the film seemed forced and, at this point in the film, out of place. The marriage drama feels underdeveloped and, again, out of place. The core of the film seems to be this idea of alternate lives which does, at some level, feed into both the political economy debate as well as the marriage troubles at some level, but the integration is minimal, at best.

Another idea that ends up popping up is something like a miniature version of what dominated Terry Gilliam's Twelve Monkeys about the nature of mental illness versus sanity and how we tell which is which or are unable to since Liam ends up getting picked up as a crazy person who thinks he's the big time real estate developer Liam O'Leary when the obviously real Liam O'Leary is happy at home with his wife and son. How can Liam prove his real identity? At the same time, the doppelganger is trying to liquidate all of Liam's assets for his own greedy ends, finding that Liam was only wealthy on paper, having leveraged everything in support of his large gamble. Well, Liam gets saved because the Irish government decides to release all non-violent mental patients. Again, another little idea thrown in about Ireland's support of mental health facilities that gets used to get Liam out of a sticky dramatic situation. I think it's easy to see my frustration with this film.

The resolution is about Liam and the doppelganger finding what's truly important to each of them: the doppelganger finding his mother and Liam once again finding his family, and an equilibrium finding itself. This is where things bring in the whole class differences implication from the earlier debates between father and son gains some dramatic purpose, and it's interesting. The poor, out on his luck guy decides to take over the upper class guy's operation, and finds it's leveraged and not just easy wealth. The upper class guy still finds a way to make his lower class existence advantageous to him through some low-end connections he makes (nothing too salacious, but it's enough to gain some blackmail on a competitor developer). It's not pure pablum like the earlier dialogue implies, giving dramatic shape to a debate while taking a side that seems somewhat surprising. Perhaps if this had been the sole focus of the film, Boorman might have been able to really dig into the idea because it does seem to be his central purpose for the film.

And then the film just kind of ends weird. It's not about ideas but simple dramatic structure. The doppelganger and Liam start on a plan, and then Liam discovers that Conner is in trouble. The amount of time and tone of the movie up until the knowledge that Conner is having problems feels like an ending (an unsatisfactory ending, to be honest), and then there's a new dramatic moment involving Conner. What happens afterwards is borderline perfect, but the structure of what leads up to that moment is just weird.

I am so torn on this film. There are real things to admire, from the pure thriller mechanics to what seems to be the application of the central idea in the later parts of the film as well as the final five minutes or so, but it's all arranged so...poorly. Really, Mr. Boorman, if you make another film, please, for the love of God, get someone else to write the script.

I want to give special mention to Brendan Gleeson, though. It's been obvious from Gleeson's breakout performance in Boorman's The General that he's a special actor, but this might be one of the best performances of his career. That it's been pretty much buried is actually really sad, not just because he's playing two characters that are actually fairly different, but because each performance is surprisingly nuanced. The rest of the performances are solidly good for what they do (a nod to Cattrall for her Irish accent), but it's Gleeson in almost every shot, and he carries the film. Ciaran Hinds also has some decent moments as a priest and childhood friend of Liam's.

I admire this film a surprising amount, but I just wish, really wish, that Boorman had brought in another writer to clean things up. It really did need it, and the film was one solid script rewrite away from bringing it all together.

This film begins with a wealthy architect named "Liam O'Leary" (Brendan Gleeson) having some financial difficulties concerning a speculative purchase on some land he has recently financed. In addition to that, he is also having some martial problems with his wife "Jane O'Leary" (Kim Cattrall). So, things aren't going as smoothly as he would like. It's during this time of stress that he begins to have what his friends consider to be hallucinations when he tells them that a man who looks exactly like him keeps appearing at irregular moments. To make matters even worse, he becomes convinced that this man intends on harming him for unknown reasons as well. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that, although this film is billed as a comedy, I really didn't see much humor in it as it was more of a mystery-drama than anything else. In essence, this was a rather peculiar film which had some dull scenes here and there yet still managed to keep my attention for the most part, and for that reason, I have rated it accordingly. Average.

Hmm.

Sadly, "The Tiger's Tail" is rubbish, and a major disappointment, because John Boorman is a great director who has made some great films. You know what I'm talking about. "Point Blank", "Deliverance", "Excalibur", "The General", "The Tailor Of Panama", "Beyond Rangoon", "The Emerald Forest". You can look up the others for yourselves.

Brenda Gleeson plays Liam O'Leary, a Dublin property developer, who's life gets changed completely when he finds himself being stalked by a doppelganger.

I have no idea what happened here, but "The Tiger's Tail" is a complete misfire and a total waste of an interesting actor in Brendan Gleeson. It fails completely as a drama and/or a black comedy, chiefly because it is not dramatic enough and it is not funny enough. I can suspend belief as well as the next man, but I didn't believe a word of "The Tiger's Tail".

And the cardinal sin? "The Tiger's Tail" is boring, boring, boring, dull, dull, dull. Maybe I'm missing the subtext somewhere. I'm not too clever.

Such a shame. Onto the next one, Mister Boorman.

This new film is very peculiar. PURPORTING to be about the Celtic Tiger and modern Ireland, it is curiously insipid. Despite setting out to be satirical, it falls flat. Hard to pin down exactly why, but probably due to laziness on the the filmmakers behalf. Why isn't he making satirical films about London? Brendan Gleeson is okay, but the two characters he plays stretch the imagination. Catrall isn't really credible as an Irish woman and some of her lines are hard to listen to. The camera-work is surprisingly dull, as some of his previous films have looked great, and doesn't make anyone look good. That said you should check it out, if only cos he is the same filmmaker who made Point Blank and Deliverance, and its a paradox to see how far off these classics he has drifted.

Brendan Gleeson might be one of the most underrated actors in the public eye. I didn't know anything about this movie when I rented it to watch it, so I had no idea who the director is. Reading it now, it makes sense. The movie is really skillfully done, the performances are great and even when you think you know where this is going, it might still be able to surprise you.

There were a few moments where you think "well he could say this or do that" to prove a point. But that is not what the movie is trying to tell you/do. The movie cares about the characters, but even more about society and how we ourselves play a role. A role that might not even befit us, but under normal circumstances we would never change ourselves. Why should we, we are happy as it is, aren't we? These questions and a lot more are being transported via a mystery story, that really has some punches for the viewer. I also really liked where this went at the end, but that is up for discussion ... Watch it and I'm sure most of you won't find this boring at all

I'm not sure whether this movie was good or not, but I kind of liked it. It was peculiar, but in a good way (not like Solondz's Wiener-Dog I saw recently).

The "Celtic Tiger" part was of no relevance to me - I wouldn't know whether it portrayed 2006 Ireland accurately or not; I was viewing this movie as a regular stalker flick, and, as such, it was quite engaging.

The acting was good, especially by the lead male. Kim Cattrall's role was not a major one, so her accent didn't bother me, especially since everyone in the movie had sort of a "neutral" accent. Having been to Ireland, I can say that none of the people in the movie sounded like the natives I met on my trip to Ireland.

The set-up was very good and engaging, but the movie declined significantly upon the doubles's entering the protagonist's house. There is no way something like this would happen in real life. It was just not believable. I was also sort of offended by the way they chose to portray the wife - as though they were trying to say that women are generally dumb and shallow, and the only thing they care about is for a man to pay attention to them. This is inaccurate and there is no way a wife would mistake a stranger for her husband of many years. Perhaps they were meant to imply that Jane knew all along that it was the double (if so, I must have missed it), in which case, perhaps, I would have seen it differently.

The ending was also kind of weird, but very original and somewhat satisfying and thought-provoking.

All in all, an enjoyable movie, and definitely superior to many a stalker flick I've seen lately. Would recommend.

I like gleeson, but this movie made no sense, gave up after 30 minutes. dont waste your time.

I was an extra on this movie, in the Awards Dinner scene near the beginning, and I looked forward to the finished product with some trepidation because the dialog seemed quite poor. However, i have been pleasantly surprised. This is a good movie, and maybe I'm stupid but I didn't see the ending coming; It thought it was a very good resolution, and I don't understand why one reviewer says it leaves numerous threads hanging. I thought all of the production values the music and everything were very good. My criticisms would be the same for most Irish movies; the relatively poor acting of the more junior actors (I refer in particular to the drunken girlfriend we first encounter in the Temple Bar nightclub. There were other weaknesses, things that could have been much better handled such as the first appearance of the doplleganger, and O'Leary getting coshed in the toilets (again, bad acting by the other actors there). Some things were just stupid, like the statement that the more houses O'Leary builds the more homeless there are; Boorman should stick to the directing and leave the economics to others. Kim shouldn't have attempted the Oirish (sic) accent. It would have been quite believable for O'Leary to have married an American, and better, even.

It gives a reasonably good insight into middle-class Ireland, and a glimpse of the world of the down-and-out (which is the same everywhere, I suppose). I stayed until the very end of the credits.

This is the very first time I have made a comment on a movie. If this superb production had received the excellent reviews that it so richly deserves then I would not have bothered. I can not recall the last time I was so engrossed by a story so well told. Each of the characters become real people encouraged by by a script which appears so simple and natural but yet allows all the superb players to add depth, feeling and emotion to the flawed yet heroic individuals who inhabit this tale. After watching this I felt as if I had just finished reading a novel ( a medium which usually allows greater empathy with well drawn characters). I found that the 'crowd' scenes both extremely funny and yet deeply poignant. Each extra has an 'over the top' tom an jerry role to play yet each character is a parody of real people in real situations that are played out on the towns and cities of Ireland every night of the week. As W.B Yeats said 'A Terrible beauty is born'. As you may have guessed I am Irish .. I could recognise the character of Ireland in this drama. The strenghs, weaknesses and joy of our nation are evident in this production. I presume John Boreman is an American. I salute him for capturing the soul of our nation and not once mention little green men with a crock of gold. Well done.

I never heard of this film, and I'm a fan of the stars and director. I found it by my daily routine of scrolling through the imdb birthday list, and seeing what's streamable by my favs on reelgood.com. I've found a lot of great lost movies that way. The Tiger's Tail is a classic in that it defies description like many movies from the olden days; it's a mix of drama, comedy, suspense, and classic for me in the sense it's very memorable and rewatchable. I will be adding it to my collection. Too bad this movie got lost. Only 18 reviews with 3 rated 1star at the time of this writing. One star?! Come on! What a shame. If you're a fan of Boorman, or any of these actors, do yourself a favor and watch this flick.

I go to Theatre and Cinema to be entertained. This film did it for me. A good story, good acting, well shot scenery... what more do I require? There is no hard and fast way of speaking, if you live in Dublin. Therefore , we must remember there are no rules... So we cannot break them. Bad accents and diction can be heard every day from people who use their voice. Take our Radio and Television front men and women, who frequently refer to 'Fillums - Tremenjus- and excepted, instead of accepted.... Do we hang them out to dry? So what if an American Actor didn't quite get it right. Did she not convince us that she was a wronged wife in a bad marriage? Did Gleason not come across as a man with many problems, who was in fear of ruining himself? Did John Kavanagh,Sinead Cusack, Sean McGinley and many other good actors not grasp the role and present it as such.? I liked it... well done John, Cast and all concerned.