User reviews

The questions raised by the video are valid questions. How could a plane have crashed into the pentagon leaving no wreckage whatever? The photos and videos of the fire fighters confirm there was absolutely no wreckage on the ground. Where is the wreckage what of the black box? An eye witness said he saw something like a missile hit the pentagon.

President Bush told school children that he saw the first plane crash into the tower on TV. Why would he make that up when there was no video of that crash on TV at the time?

How could the steel inner core of the towers melt when the fire did not reach the bottom of the towers not even half way down? Why is it that not of shred of evidence related to the planes has been released?

How does it happen that the tower planes and the pentagon plane somehow exploded into oblivion. One must admit that is very suspicious as though it were planned some how. How convenient that all the legal work on the corporate fraud was destroyed in building 7. Frankly it takes a lot of blind faith to believe the government and media explanations for what happened.

These are all valid questions and they deserve honest answers.

Although a bit dated, the facts set forth in this documentary are truly valid. They have been documented from a number of sources ranging from lay comment to expert testimony verified by video footage of the day's events. Although there are now a number of more recent documentaries that expose the myths set forth in the 911 Commission Report even further, this is a must see. As is stated in the beginning of the film, denial is a common response so I suggest viewing with an open mind. Other documentaries on the subject include: Loose Change (also 2nd Edition and Final Cut) 911 Mysteries (Part 1, Demolition) Other parts pending.

It assumes you are naturally resistant to a conspiracy so large. It takes the viewer through a series of logical steps, using easily-available photographic evidence and published reports, and leads to what turns out - surprisingly - to be an inescapable conclusion. It really changed my view of the US military, who I had naturally assumed to be generally incompetent. Now, I have much more respect for their capabilities. It also explains why the neocons are given so much respect in the capitol. I won't say you'll be as convinced as I am. I had an open mind on the subject, and was simply waiting for the time and inclination to look into the facts. It's true I don't automatically accept the 'facts' presented by US govt officials and reported without comment by the media, but in all other ways my brain works quite normally. Whereas Michael Moore does not dispute the 'facts' presented by US govt officials (Chomsky-like), this movie just examines the hard evidence - and more importantly, examines it in a logical order. There is no jumping around, no confusing lists of names, none of that skull n bones and illuminati stuff. Just 'look at this picture, do you see what I see?' and 'if you see what I see, and nobody reports it, doesn't this imply a kind of conspiracy?'. It's a well-done, high-quality production.

After having watched the DVD yesterday I must say that the evidence is so overwhelming that a cover-up took place that it's amazing that there is not a widespread movement to bring the government to task.

All you need is one lie to make you question all the disinformation we were fed after 9/11.

Tim Moody's comments are illustrative of a "ostrich in the sand" mentality. Like the movie commentator said there will be 1/3 of people who will vehemently deny any facts brought before them.

We do know that there were other instances in American History that demonstrate cover-ups and disinformation: OKC bombing, 1st Iraq war, WWII, JFK assassination, Civil War, War against Cuba, etc. etc.... How can anyone trust what the major media outlets and the government say? It is true when they say you must always follow the money..... Wars make those in power rich.

For once the truth has come out about that fateful day in 2001.

And to reply to MR Stupid AKA Tim Moody (UprTupr)

(Not since "Fahrenheit 9/11" have I seen such bombastic, utterly laughable garbage purporting to be "truth)

Michael Moore is a hate figure in the US but is loved here in the UK and Ireland because unlike most Amercians he can see what has being going on just like the rest of the world. OPEN YOUR EYES.

(A "pod" on UAL Flight 175? Nope. Try the shadow of the right engine since the sun was shining in that direction.)

YES there is a POD there are you blind ??!!!

(A "flash" upon impact? Sorry. Metal on metal sparking and/or video enhancement)

Metal on Metal sparking ???...strange considering there are mostly WINDOWS along the surface of the two towers !!! Video enhancement - now you are just making it up !!!

(No other security camera footage at the Pentagon? It obviously didn't occur to von Kleist or his handlers that the Pentagon is a high security building and providing footage from other cameras would have compromised security by revealing their location.)

Everyone knows the location of the Pentagon so why would it compromise its location ???!!! and I'm sure camera are hidden quite well these days anyway.

("Pull" the building? Nowhere on the video is the use of this term explained. It's taken completely out of context)

If you were paying attention to the film the phrase is actually used. And the clip was shown TWICE.

As the presenter said at the start of the film so of you would be in denial and it looks that way.

no wonder most people in the world look at the US and shake their heads as you haven't got a clue.

I have seen a lot of movies on the 9-11 cover up. however, this one probably sums up the endless proof the best. Also I do believe that Van Kliest was the first person to notice the pod and the missile flash before the planes hit the tower. Good call man. sometimes the best place to hide something is right in front of your face! Just one quick comment on the flashes. It is absolutely irrefutable that the flash happens before the first plane hits. The second one is controversial. However, if the flash really is the fuselage sparking off the tower wouldn't the wings also spark????? When you view the footage the rest of the plane goes in without any flash.

Don't listen to these people that are saying this movie is terrible. They are in denial. Take the red pill and do some research.

Everyone who had any reaction to the incidents that took place Sept. 11, 2001 owes it to themselves to watch this film. It is a non biased reflection and presentation of newscasts, interviews, physical evidence or lack thereof that the American mass media didn't seem fit to force feed its viewers as was done with the images that were literally burned into the minds of horrified viewers. The material contained in this film is shocking, the fact that this information has not brought more media attention is just plain mind numbing.

The events that took place are tragic enough as they were, that so very many questions have gone unanswered and blatantly ignored compounds the situation exponentially. See the movie, listen to the information and decide for yourself, then most importantly...SPREAD THE WORD.

Isn't it unbeliavble that there is not a single photo of an approaching airliner? Even our modest apartment buildings have security cameras just in case a small burglary occurs. Even a few vague picture would stop all this senseless discussion. Americans -- and the whole world -- were fooled and we are still paying the price in terms of mistrust, war, hatred, etc.

I have just seen this "documentary" on TV. Anyone who believes this rubbish really needs to turn off their TV and actually start thinking for themselves. The presenter begins the program by asserting this is a conspiracy and not a "conspiracy theory" and makes some strange comparison to buying raffle tickets, and it gets worse from there.

The first theory presented in the program is that a missile hit the Pentagon. By casting doubt on random pieces of information, however irrelevant, the presenter is hoping that we suddenly believe his version of events. In one example he quotes an independently published book that states the damage was 100 feet across, when it was actually less. Somehow this is meant to strengthen his case, but he never actually says HOW this should convince us.

For the remainder of the program the presenter focuses on the World Trade Centre attacks. Most of this segment is based around quotes taken from people soon after the attacks. Anyone watching on that day will remember how scrambled information was to begin with. People who have just witnessed a traumatic event are not reliable witnesses, especially when there is actual video evidence (which was ignored in this program) that contradicts what they are saying.

Most of the "information" that this program is based on was taken from random conspiracy websites. The producers should have saved themselves some time and visited Snopes: http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm I'll leave you with a final thought - even if the official versions of events is wrong that DOESN'T make this version any more correct. Remember that, watch the program again, and you will see how little "evidence" this program actually presents towards its inane theories.

The film 'In plane site' was an interesting revelation into pictorial fact. At least it was done WITHOUT any powers that be, therefore without their manipulative media control and this alone opens speculation around the 'powers that be' and their real agenda's, opposed to their supporters who don't seem to know that the governors they support are not capable of representing the good of the major part of the population,FAR FROM IT!! They are consumed with self interest. History shows the same pattern over and over. (And over...argue with that dockyards!) If you really think they act only in the peoples interest wouldn't they be more up front about their dealings?? NO! they're not, but you 2 party idiots keep voting for them 'coz it's all you know how to do!! Wake up fools! you are riding the whole worlds death train.

This is a good first step in looking at the evidence of the attacks on 911. It shows a lot of strange or coincidence happenings on the day and also is not over bearing or hard to follow. It give the viewer a lot of little hints that something might be wrong with the official story, and the logical next steps are to start viewing other docs for more information, or to close the closet door and remain close minded.

I saw this film a while ago and I must say that I was impressed the first run. However, after checking the facts myself I could see that most of the controversial points made in this movie could be easily refuted.

I do believe that the whole truth about the events of 9/11 is yet to be unraveled, but this movie does its best to divert doubters from the real issues.

I would recommend to see the "9/11 Press for truth" documentary, see the "Why We Fight" documentary and read John K. Cooleys book "Unholy Wars" instead of watching this poorly researched movie.

The 911 Truth movement needs more peer review and less ranting conspiracy theorists. However, this movie is not utterly useless, if nothing else it raises important questions that drives you to pursuing the facts for yourself. So if you have an hour and a half to spare, see it and make up your own mind. Do NOT take my word for it.

It is when we stop asking questions that the real trouble begins.

According to many, this has already happened.

Not since "Fahrenheit 9/11" have I seen such bombastic, utterly laughable garbage purporting to be "truth".

Through the use of obviously doctored video, mysterious audio added to video, and statements taken out of context, host von Kleist attempts to hook the viewer into believing that 9/11 was all a big government "plot", "conspiracy", "scheme", "shell game", etc.

A "pod" on UAL Flight 175? Nope. Try the shadow of the right engine since the sun was shining in that direction.

A "flash" upon impact? Sorry. Metal on metal sparking and/or video enhancement.

An explosion at the base of WTC 2 BEFORE the collapse? Obviously doctored video since if you look at what is supposed to be the south tower it has the same exact damage as the north tower. (But I believe von Kleist said this was due to a video "glitch" in his "director's" cut. How convenient. ) No windows on the plane? How far away was the viewer and how long did they have to see the plane before it hit? Being a pilot I know from experience that at 500mph and close to a mile away you can't discern much detail on an aircraft. And considering that airliner windows are less than a foot square this would be consistent. Go out to an airport someday and park about a half-mile from the approach path and watch the airliners come in. See how much detail you can actually see. Anyone who bothered to look for photos of the second plane will find them with the UAL logo on the tail and UAL's paint scheme.

No other security camera footage at the Pentagon? It obviously didn't occur to von Kleist or his handlers that the Pentagon is a high security building and providing footage from other cameras would have compromised security by revealing their location.

"Pull" the building? Nowhere on the video is the use of this term explained. It's taken completely out of context.

As for WTC 7? Watch the History Channel's presentation of Greatest Engineering Disasters in their Modern Marvels series and all of this is explained. There were no preplanted explosives or any other such nonsense.

And as for the missing debris from the plane that hit the Pentagon? In this case watch the National Geographic Channel's presentation of "Seconds From Disaster: The Pentagon" for a truthful explanation.

Another 'documentary', produced by cranks, more or less like "Loose Change". It's no wonder these people, including their panjandrums Michael Moore, all the way up to chairman Howard Dean and beyond, are collectively referred to as the 'Nutroots'.

At least "Loose Change" has the more movie-ish construction, with the narrator 'outside' the visual narrative. This is a radical's "Shame on you" TV report. So if you're just interested in the intellectual train wreck of a thought process displayed by the modern radical Left, go with "Loose Change, Edit. whatever-they-extend-it-to".

I devoted most of my "Loose Change" comment to refocusing the attention to what is completely ignored in that work: the question of why They hate Us. Isolated from that inconvenient issue, in an alternate universe, actually, the conspiracy makes perfect sense. That's how movies work; there must be a viable postulation of an alternate reality.

What gives me great concern is that these 'movies' don't postulate a viable alternate reality; yet judging by the proliferation of websites, blogs and comments, large numbers of people seem to profess absolute belief in these contrarian views. The motivations include (but are not limited to), the following: hatred of President Bush, hatred of America, hatred of the West, ignorance, postmodern relativism, multiculturalism, love of Socialism, and combinations of all of the above...the central delusions include that all the Western powers are 'wrong' and ruled by friendly-fire despots, and all of the 'oppressed peoples' of the Earth should be vindicated.

So I urge the reader who invests time, as I do, in movies and the commentary surrounding movies, to remember the larger picture that's 'outside the movie':

"What happened on September 11, 2001, was a kind of barbarian raid. It is true that it was not driven by the desire for plunder, but by the desire for destruction and glory, yet it was a barbarian raid for all that. In style and perhaps also in its deep motivation, it was the old spectacle of the wild herders from steppe and desert irrupting into the settled, orderly, civilized places that they simultaneously hated and envied. It was a raid across the Great Wall...

"In our own age there is of course no Great Wall to mark the line between civilization and barbarism. In this world of easy travel and globalized commerce, it is not easy even to tell where the one thing ends and the other starts...

"...(still,)it is an extreme kind of moral obtuseness that refuses to notice the difference between a people who strive to minimize non-combatant casualties and a people who do their best to maximize them. I note also that when Arabs are injured in an Arab terrorist attack against Jews, they are cared for in Israeli hospitals, to which they have been transported by Israeli ambulances. Imagine the converse, if it were possible: Jewish inhabitants of an Arab country, injured in a Jewish-terrorist attack on Arabs. They would be torn to pieces by ululating mobs of Arabs, and the pieces would be paraded triumphantly through streets crowded with laughing revelers, the whole thing broadcast on Al-Jazeera to general rejoicing around the Arab world.

"There you have the difference between civilization and barbarism. If you can't see it, I can't help you: you are morally blind. The wars we are fighting now — the war against Islamic terrorism, and also the war against the desperate, degraded, dangerous state of Middle Eastern political culture at large — are wars of civilization against barbarism. There is no guarantee of victory, and it is possible that our people's will might waver and fail; but these are not contrived or unnecessary wars against equal cultures — this is no "clash of civilizations."...We are not fighting against Islam, or against Arabs, or against Iraqis. We are fighting barbarism,...the most ancient enemy of all."

911: IN PLANE SITE has all of the answers, man! You thought that the terrorists hit the World Trade Center towers with passenger planes? Ha! It was the government, man! Just like they did at Pearl Harbor! All a ruse, just get us involved in a war!

Woah!

The Pentagon and WTC were bombed with bombs and missiles, dude! The evidence is clear! It was an inside job! Wake up and smell your President, man! This whole plot was pulled off by that well-known super-genius, George W. Bush! He and his hand-picked cabal of like-minded, ultra-brilliant psychopaths orchestrated the whole thing, man!

In league with the media and other world powers, that Machiavellian mastermind, George W. Bush, and his conspiring cadre of creeps concocted this calamitous catastrophe!

Where are the hidden videos? Why haven't they been released? The truth must come out! Only William Lewis cares enough to take on the nefarious powers that be! He's gathered the information, and only he knows what really happened on that dreadful day!

Our worst fears have been realized! Our leaders are all members of the "Common Purpose" organization! They're being trained to rule the world, man! This is why the transportation and education systems don't work! It's all part of the plan!

Spread the word, before it's too late! "It's A Cookbook!", "Keep watching the skies!", "Soylent Green is people!", "There is no spoon!". Amen, man...