5 reviews
Video killed the old king's ghost
- cold_lazarou
- Nov 5, 2011
- Permalink
Looks like it was filmed at a renaissance festival
The story takes place in Denmark. Hamlet the prince is informed by the ghost of his father that his mother and uncle were responsible for his father's death. His mother and his uncle get married before the funeral meat is cold. How will Hamlet deal with the situation and what effect will it have on others around him?
The clothing is straight out of a renaissance festival. They speak as to each other, not to an audience. Not being popular actors, you do not have to remember them in other presentations. Some of the dialogs are skipped but enough is left in to capture the story. The film is cut more like a movie than a copy of a stage play. You will hear a background mob most of the time; one exception is the soliloquy on the rock. They do play around with double exposure during some scenes. Also, there are some scenes where the camera focuses on the face while the character thinks; at other times people read out loud. They left in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. They took out Fortinbras.
I know most of the play by heart but sometimes the actors make it sound fresh. They do take an effort to not make it look like they are just going through the motions.
The DVD I saw is for one hour and 54 minutes. The large screen shows that this looks like a PAL conversion.
The clothing is straight out of a renaissance festival. They speak as to each other, not to an audience. Not being popular actors, you do not have to remember them in other presentations. Some of the dialogs are skipped but enough is left in to capture the story. The film is cut more like a movie than a copy of a stage play. You will hear a background mob most of the time; one exception is the soliloquy on the rock. They do play around with double exposure during some scenes. Also, there are some scenes where the camera focuses on the face while the character thinks; at other times people read out loud. They left in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. They took out Fortinbras.
I know most of the play by heart but sometimes the actors make it sound fresh. They do take an effort to not make it look like they are just going through the motions.
The DVD I saw is for one hour and 54 minutes. The large screen shows that this looks like a PAL conversion.
- Bernie4444
- May 24, 2024
- Permalink
Pretty Good
My dad directed this version of Hamlet, and if you watch closely I make a brief appearance passing a message to Claudius. While short on production values the film does cover the major plot points and central character themes, focusing in particular on Hamlet and Claudius. It could be considered as a way of introducing young adults to Shakespeare or as interesting visualisation to someone who has recently read the play. The cast is generally pretty good with Blake himself from Blake's 7 playing Claudius and Will Houston in particular produces a great performance as Hamlet, despite the fact that he is slightly Ginger. The fight scene's are also notable, indeed I believe they were lifted directly from an RSC production in which some of the cast had performed, so their pretty good but unfortunately no matrix style wire-foo
- hall_nikolas
- Apr 21, 2006
- Permalink
Not half bad
As a collector of Shakespeare DVDs I am always thrilled to find a Hamlet DVD that I haven't seen before. I have had some disappointments with modern and extremely amateurish versions of Richard The Second (2001) and others, but this version of Hamlet starring William Houston was not awful. It does look fairly low-budget, but apart from a slightly grainy picture quality, it *is* a proper movie, with castles and out-door scenes, medieval ambiance, etc. This version was, to my mind, just a tad more worthwhile than both Nicol Williamson's stage version (1969), and both the 2000 films (Campbell Scott's and Michael Almereyda's), all of which I've rated a 4 or a 5.
Although this DVD lacks subtitles (I think it is scandalous to release any Shakespeare DVD without subtitles, but unfortunately it's often done), the actors here mostly manage to speak very clearly - of course, they *are* British, which, it seems, counts for quite a lot. The sound quality seems to decrease as the movie goes on, however, perhaps because of background noise (not excluding the music) in the plentiful out-door scenes.
The acting talent is rather uneven; Houston is adequate but not great as Hamlet (though he definitely has his moments - I like the scene where he actually lies in the dust, "seeking for his noble father", and I also thought the "I have of late, wherefore I know not, lost all my mirth" speech was well done), and this also goes for much of the cast, though some are better than others. The best performance clearly comes from David Powell-Davies as Polonius, whose take on the character is fresh and convincing. Horatio is quite good, too, with several admirable scenes. The relationship between Claudius and Gertrude is also appropriately lusty, which is an overlooked element in many productions. I don't think there's much acting emanating from Gareth Thomas, though; he is not the seductive satyr that Hamlet says he is. But then again, I've yet to see a Hamlet version with a properly handsome, seductive and thoroughly devious Claudius.
Overall the play included a surprisingly large amount of the 2nd Quarto text, opting rather to shorten speeches than to skip entire scenes. But a lot of speeches and passages were shortened almost to the point of omission. The only major part missing was the Fortinbras subplot, which is omitted in many productions. But I did in fact remain absorbed - if only intermittently impressed - with this Hamlet throughout its 114 minutes (no, not 220 as it says on the DVD sleeve), which in a somewhat amateurish production of a difficult play is quite a feat.
Amateurish call I it, because the editing, both of the text and the film scenes, left something to be desired. Strange cuts occur frequently, speeches are practically interrupted, and the director doesn't quite seem to have mastered the art of fade-outs and transitions. The scenes of violence are also not brilliantly choreographed. On the whole, this film comes short as regards the film-making craft, but is of normal theatrical standards as regards interpretation of the text. One is compelled to remark (and not for the first time) that people who do not know what they are doing should cut their film-making teeth on easier material than Shakespeare. Having said that, however, I am still positively surprised with this version, and may on occasion return to it for repeated viewings. Among the better Hamlet adaptations on film, however, it is not. While neither very good nor half bad, the result is somewhere in between.
I rate it a solid 6 out of 10 stars.
Although this DVD lacks subtitles (I think it is scandalous to release any Shakespeare DVD without subtitles, but unfortunately it's often done), the actors here mostly manage to speak very clearly - of course, they *are* British, which, it seems, counts for quite a lot. The sound quality seems to decrease as the movie goes on, however, perhaps because of background noise (not excluding the music) in the plentiful out-door scenes.
The acting talent is rather uneven; Houston is adequate but not great as Hamlet (though he definitely has his moments - I like the scene where he actually lies in the dust, "seeking for his noble father", and I also thought the "I have of late, wherefore I know not, lost all my mirth" speech was well done), and this also goes for much of the cast, though some are better than others. The best performance clearly comes from David Powell-Davies as Polonius, whose take on the character is fresh and convincing. Horatio is quite good, too, with several admirable scenes. The relationship between Claudius and Gertrude is also appropriately lusty, which is an overlooked element in many productions. I don't think there's much acting emanating from Gareth Thomas, though; he is not the seductive satyr that Hamlet says he is. But then again, I've yet to see a Hamlet version with a properly handsome, seductive and thoroughly devious Claudius.
Overall the play included a surprisingly large amount of the 2nd Quarto text, opting rather to shorten speeches than to skip entire scenes. But a lot of speeches and passages were shortened almost to the point of omission. The only major part missing was the Fortinbras subplot, which is omitted in many productions. But I did in fact remain absorbed - if only intermittently impressed - with this Hamlet throughout its 114 minutes (no, not 220 as it says on the DVD sleeve), which in a somewhat amateurish production of a difficult play is quite a feat.
Amateurish call I it, because the editing, both of the text and the film scenes, left something to be desired. Strange cuts occur frequently, speeches are practically interrupted, and the director doesn't quite seem to have mastered the art of fade-outs and transitions. The scenes of violence are also not brilliantly choreographed. On the whole, this film comes short as regards the film-making craft, but is of normal theatrical standards as regards interpretation of the text. One is compelled to remark (and not for the first time) that people who do not know what they are doing should cut their film-making teeth on easier material than Shakespeare. Having said that, however, I am still positively surprised with this version, and may on occasion return to it for repeated viewings. Among the better Hamlet adaptations on film, however, it is not. While neither very good nor half bad, the result is somewhere in between.
I rate it a solid 6 out of 10 stars.
A good cast in a decent attempt to film something pretty damn near unfilmable, on a shoestring.