In this haunting sequel to Wes Craven's Dracula 2000, a group of medical students discover the body of the infamous count.In this haunting sequel to Wes Craven's Dracula 2000, a group of medical students discover the body of the infamous count.In this haunting sequel to Wes Craven's Dracula 2000, a group of medical students discover the body of the infamous count.
- Awards
- 3 nominations
Christopher Hunter
- Corello
- (as Chris Hunter)
Tom Kane
- Cartoon Voice
- (voice)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaDespite the cover saying Wes Craven Presents, Wes Craven had nothing to do with the production.
- GoofsDespite having full thickness burns over his entire body, Dracula's clothes are virtually untouched at the beginning of the movie.
- Quotes
Kenny: What have we got here? Have you come to give me a whippin, dad? Have I been that bad?
[charges Uffizi, who strangles him with his whip]
Kenny: I'm not what you think!
Father Uffizi: You're exactly what I think.
Kenny: Do you want my soul, Father? Do you want my soul? Is that it?
Father Uffizi: No, God gets your soul. I just want your head.
[decapitates Kenny]
- Crazy creditsThe vampire casts no reflection because its image is an affront to God.
- Cardinal Siqueros
- ConnectionsEdited into Dracula III: Legacy (2005)
Featured review
Oh sure, it won't win any awards, but b-movies never do. I'm not sure why the other users enjoyed the opening scene so much, but I enjoyed it for the incredibly bad stunts myself. I laughed out loud as the woman fell down the stairs, onto the landing, and kept falling down the rest of the stairs. Pure gold.
I also happen to know a little behind-the-scenes about this one. Do you know, it was not originally intended to be a straight-to-video release. It was originally scheduled to be released last October. I'm guessing the similarity to the popular Blade II sealed its fate. Do you know, they spent like 3 months or something filming in Romania? I'm not sure what for, considering the movie takes place in New Orleans. Why was Roy Scheider listed in the credits? His part was no more than a cameo. I was rather disappointed about that, because I really enjoy Roy Scheider.
But, for all intents and purposes, this is a rather good b-movie. There are expected, but fun, plot twists, and I never got bored. Well, maybe a little in the very beginning. It was a standard 5-man team of protagonists, a nicely evil Dracula, and a Blade-like vampire hunting priest. Note that I said nicely evil, and not deliciously evil. I will admit that it must be a great challenge for an actor to do most of his work with no lines and no movement (he spends most of the movie confined), but I really could have gone for a more evil Dracula.
I sincerely hope that people aren't renting direct-to-video movies with the idea that greatness lies within: it does not. What this movie does well is know its limitations. Special effects are only used when absolutely necessary, which makes them look much better than some of the really poor effects in Blade (the first one). It's fun, it's interesting, and it's got a good ending. Well worth renting.
Rating: Groovy
I also happen to know a little behind-the-scenes about this one. Do you know, it was not originally intended to be a straight-to-video release. It was originally scheduled to be released last October. I'm guessing the similarity to the popular Blade II sealed its fate. Do you know, they spent like 3 months or something filming in Romania? I'm not sure what for, considering the movie takes place in New Orleans. Why was Roy Scheider listed in the credits? His part was no more than a cameo. I was rather disappointed about that, because I really enjoy Roy Scheider.
But, for all intents and purposes, this is a rather good b-movie. There are expected, but fun, plot twists, and I never got bored. Well, maybe a little in the very beginning. It was a standard 5-man team of protagonists, a nicely evil Dracula, and a Blade-like vampire hunting priest. Note that I said nicely evil, and not deliciously evil. I will admit that it must be a great challenge for an actor to do most of his work with no lines and no movement (he spends most of the movie confined), but I really could have gone for a more evil Dracula.
I sincerely hope that people aren't renting direct-to-video movies with the idea that greatness lies within: it does not. What this movie does well is know its limitations. Special effects are only used when absolutely necessary, which makes them look much better than some of the really poor effects in Blade (the first one). It's fun, it's interesting, and it's got a good ending. Well worth renting.
Rating: Groovy
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Wes Craven Presents Dracula II: Ascension
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $3,200,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 25 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content