19 reviews
The first 20 minutes was slow and I thought this was going no where. But, then when we start to see flashbacks of the concentration camps and what Perl saw and endured there; it gets really good. Christine Lahti is really good and will surely be nominated for an Emmy. I mean, it was awful how the interview panel tries to make Dr. Perl look bad because of the things she had to do in order to survive her imprisonment. And the film does have those shocking Nazi moments, like shootings in the head, killing pregnant women, and experiments on babies.
FINAL VERDICT: This was a good movie about a Jewish Dr. who struggles with the moral choices she must make to survive Nazi imprisonment. Definitely catch this if you have Showtime.
FINAL VERDICT: This was a good movie about a Jewish Dr. who struggles with the moral choices she must make to survive Nazi imprisonment. Definitely catch this if you have Showtime.
The true story of the Late Doctor Gisella Perl is unforgettable and the stuff of which legends and heroines are made. She was truly a most remarkable human being.
However, in my opinion this made-for-television movie did not do justice to Dr. Perl's true life story. The scenes and sets were cheap and recognizable from other contemporary movies made by the same production company. The script (by Anne Meredith) was over-dramatized, stilted and incomplete, e.g. the horror of Dr Perl having to smother to death many live birth children in order to save the lives of their mothers is not mentioned and was one horror, along with the hundreds of abortions she performed to save lives, that haunted Dr. Perl until her death.
The acting and script were so stilted and so melodramatic that it deterred from the true story and made me question if the story could be true or should be taken seriously. Only because I read Dr. Perl's book and many articles about her life that I knew the story to be true. Some of the actors are guilty of terrible overacting, especially in many scenes revealing details of Dr. Perls's life that really call for, nay demand, understatement that would have been far more effective for the realization of the real Dr. Perl and her family. Beau Bridges was good as the lead immigration officer (his part scripted to make him appear as an interrogator for the Inquisition) and Christine Lahti gave a fair, albeit an over the top, melodramatic performance and was often guilty of just plain overacting. Richard Crenna and Bruce Davison are as wooden as manikins in a window display and their roles in this movie still escape me. All in all the script, sets and acting were inferior and deficient.
This story deserves a better treatment than it received in this television movie because Dr. Gisella Perl was a real heroine, not just a death camp survivor.
I give this movie 3/5 stars, mainly for Dr. Perl's true story, not the acting, script or cinematography.
However, in my opinion this made-for-television movie did not do justice to Dr. Perl's true life story. The scenes and sets were cheap and recognizable from other contemporary movies made by the same production company. The script (by Anne Meredith) was over-dramatized, stilted and incomplete, e.g. the horror of Dr Perl having to smother to death many live birth children in order to save the lives of their mothers is not mentioned and was one horror, along with the hundreds of abortions she performed to save lives, that haunted Dr. Perl until her death.
The acting and script were so stilted and so melodramatic that it deterred from the true story and made me question if the story could be true or should be taken seriously. Only because I read Dr. Perl's book and many articles about her life that I knew the story to be true. Some of the actors are guilty of terrible overacting, especially in many scenes revealing details of Dr. Perls's life that really call for, nay demand, understatement that would have been far more effective for the realization of the real Dr. Perl and her family. Beau Bridges was good as the lead immigration officer (his part scripted to make him appear as an interrogator for the Inquisition) and Christine Lahti gave a fair, albeit an over the top, melodramatic performance and was often guilty of just plain overacting. Richard Crenna and Bruce Davison are as wooden as manikins in a window display and their roles in this movie still escape me. All in all the script, sets and acting were inferior and deficient.
This story deserves a better treatment than it received in this television movie because Dr. Gisella Perl was a real heroine, not just a death camp survivor.
I give this movie 3/5 stars, mainly for Dr. Perl's true story, not the acting, script or cinematography.
- SpitfireIXB
- May 5, 2010
- Permalink
Joe Sargent was ruthless with the editing,the fast cuts pulled you right into the story, he made it move at a great pace.
Don Morgan did a brilliant job on lighting - I love it when a DOP is not afraid to have faces drop into shadows. Beautiful texure throughout.
Jeff Ginn did an absolute stellar job on production Design.
The show felt like a feature film.
Christine Lahti should be nominated for her role in this film
Don Morgan did a brilliant job on lighting - I love it when a DOP is not afraid to have faces drop into shadows. Beautiful texure throughout.
Jeff Ginn did an absolute stellar job on production Design.
The show felt like a feature film.
Christine Lahti should be nominated for her role in this film
Out of the Ashes is one of the best portrayals of the life of a Holocaust survivor I have seen yet. As an avid researcher of the Holocaust I have read Dr. Perl's 1948 novel of her life as a concentration camp survivor and the accounts of her work as a camp doctor. Showtime could not have done a more superior job bringing this woman's story to the screen. This is certainly a movie that will grip at your heart strings , Jewish or not. Auschwitz was re-created with fierce accuracy. Even the most hardened heart could not feel anything but pure admiration as the story unfolds of Dr. Perl's struggle to help the women of Auschwitz and her own struggle for survival. Dr. Perl single handedly assisted in the preservation of the Jewish people by helping the innocent women victims to stay alive and fight with the hope that they would one day present the world with a new generation of Jews that would be free. She then came to America and assisted in delivering this new generation before she retired in Israel and ended her life there doing volunteer work. This is an extraordinary story of one of the bravest woman I have ever learned of. I could not give this movie a higher rating.
The true story about a woman named Gisella Perl, a jewish doctor whom lived in Sighet (Hungary) during WW2. After the 1944 german occupation of Hungary, the family of the doctor was first interned in the Sighet ghetto after which they were deported in May 1944 to Auschwitz-Birkenau.
The story is told through flashbacks that the doctor experiences from the moment she arrives in New York, just after WW2 ended. In these flashbacks, we will see some of her experiences in the concentration camp and what she did to survive. And this is not only about surviving herself, but also to help pregnant prisoners survive.
For a TV movie, the quality is pretty decent. It is unfortunately not comparible to an average feature film production. This can for instance be seen back in the limited set of the concentration camp. But overall, I think this TV movie is for sure one of the better TV productions.
Concluding, I think this movie deserves a score of 6.4/10, resulting in an IMDb rating of 6 stars.
It is worthwile noting that the famous jewish survivor Elie Wiesel - whom in 1956 published his first book on his experiences in Auschwitz - also came from the hungarian town Sighet. Elie Wiesel received the 1986 Nobel Peace Price.
The story is told through flashbacks that the doctor experiences from the moment she arrives in New York, just after WW2 ended. In these flashbacks, we will see some of her experiences in the concentration camp and what she did to survive. And this is not only about surviving herself, but also to help pregnant prisoners survive.
For a TV movie, the quality is pretty decent. It is unfortunately not comparible to an average feature film production. This can for instance be seen back in the limited set of the concentration camp. But overall, I think this TV movie is for sure one of the better TV productions.
Concluding, I think this movie deserves a score of 6.4/10, resulting in an IMDb rating of 6 stars.
It is worthwile noting that the famous jewish survivor Elie Wiesel - whom in 1956 published his first book on his experiences in Auschwitz - also came from the hungarian town Sighet. Elie Wiesel received the 1986 Nobel Peace Price.
- Erik_Surewaard
- Aug 6, 2023
- Permalink
"Out of the Ashes" is very nearly the best story brought to the screen, among the many I've seen. At issue here (which many may not realise) is the life-story of one Doctor Gisella Perl--a Hungarian Jew who, along with her entire family, was captured from the family's home-town of Sighet and sent by boxcar to Auschwitz--while the holocaust itself provides the backdrop for the story. Like "Sophie's Choice", this film involved the difficult 'choiceless choices' that were made by some of the survivors of the Second World War's most infamous extermination camp.
In order to truly appreciate the story and the portrayal, one must know something of Hungarians and of Hungary, as well as their role in World War II. Actress Christine Lahti turned in such a marvelous and unforgettable performance, I actually thought I was seeing a Hungarian actress playing the role (to begin with), and then a really fine performance it was, to boot! I found myself on the edge of my seat with a film that, being a product of cable television, didn't garner such advance expectations. And but for one very glaring and avoidable error, which happens early in the film (only one scene), the final product was really quite well done. Bravo to Showtime!
Lahti's performance was award-winning, to say the very least, whether or not she was ever properly recognised. Add: a wonderful supporting cast, recruited in the US, Canada, and Eastern Europe. The scenery is lovely (filmed mainly in Lithuania; the film-makers were able to find a beautiful town not destroyed during the war). For those who have not seen this film, please do! It's a remarkable autobiography (i.e. the book on which its based) and life story. I think the actual Dr. Perl would have been proud of, and pleased with Lahti's performance and portrayal of her. Rent the DVD rather than wait for Showtime to rerun it (even though I'm sure it will be run again and again). Rating: 4,5 stars on 5.
In order to truly appreciate the story and the portrayal, one must know something of Hungarians and of Hungary, as well as their role in World War II. Actress Christine Lahti turned in such a marvelous and unforgettable performance, I actually thought I was seeing a Hungarian actress playing the role (to begin with), and then a really fine performance it was, to boot! I found myself on the edge of my seat with a film that, being a product of cable television, didn't garner such advance expectations. And but for one very glaring and avoidable error, which happens early in the film (only one scene), the final product was really quite well done. Bravo to Showtime!
Lahti's performance was award-winning, to say the very least, whether or not she was ever properly recognised. Add: a wonderful supporting cast, recruited in the US, Canada, and Eastern Europe. The scenery is lovely (filmed mainly in Lithuania; the film-makers were able to find a beautiful town not destroyed during the war). For those who have not seen this film, please do! It's a remarkable autobiography (i.e. the book on which its based) and life story. I think the actual Dr. Perl would have been proud of, and pleased with Lahti's performance and portrayal of her. Rent the DVD rather than wait for Showtime to rerun it (even though I'm sure it will be run again and again). Rating: 4,5 stars on 5.
This portrayal of Dr. Gisella Perl is the greatest movie about life inside the fences of Auschwitz. As a history major, specified on the Holocaust, I believe the cast and crew of this movie really knew what they were doing. Every time I watch it, tears form in my eyes as Lahti portrays Perl in the scene where she pulls her sleeve up to the U.S. men explaining how she was not a collaborator, how she was a prisoner, and that she had the identification number to prove it. I hope that this movie did Dr. Perl justice and her family see's what a tremendous woman she was. Now every time I do any research project or paper for a history class concerning the Holocaust, Nazi era, or Hitler, I bring up Dr. Perl, and explain how it takes more than courage to save all the lives she saved... it takes love, compassion, and devotion to her fellow inmates and all the persecuted victims. This movie deserves more than one award.. it deserves to be in some kind of Hall of Fame.
- sprite4353
- Jan 12, 2005
- Permalink
In "Out of the Ashes", Lahti is out front delivering a typically sterling performance as a gynecologist and Auschwitz survivor who applies for citizenship to the US while reliving the horrors of her WWII experience via flashback before a panel of review not unlike the Spanish Inquisition. This lame flick is melodramatic to the point of the ridiculous with the bad guys being the personification of evil and the good guys being worthy of canonization as saints. If we needed another WWII death camp story, which we don't, this one certainly is not it. A pathetically melodramatic treatment of a serious subject in the guise of a biopic not worthy of further commentary. (C)
- amanda-culley2
- Feb 17, 2006
- Permalink
I agree wholeheartedly with George Parker. No one would deny that dreadful things happened in Auschwtiz but AS A MOVIE this SUCKS. Gisella Perl left very vivid descriptions of the horrors endured which should have been the central theme.Instead we had cheap sets, lousy cinematography, inaccurate depictions (re uniforms, characters etc) and melodramatic overacting which all added up up to one disappointing MOVIE. PLAYING FOR TIME, THE GREY ZONE, ESCAPE FROM SOBIBOR & TRIUMPH OF THE SPIRIT all do better justice to the topic. Shame on the the Director, Jospeh Sargeant who also did PLAYING FOR TIME but seemed unable to reach the same heights this time round. Bringing in some "big" names, Richard Crenna, Beau Bridges etc hoping to, what, lend some class to the movie or to the lame overacting ???!! As Homer Simpson would put it ...... BORING !!!!!!
- The_Juggalo5588
- Nov 6, 2006
- Permalink
the actress playing the role of Dr Gisela Pearl should be nominated for her performance. the film showed the courage of the human spirit in the face of hate and tragedy. after looking at the film, I was humbled by the courage of this woman who lost all her family but decide in spite of what happened to her to survive and help other fellow humans. she also had to go through the pain of defending herself after being accused of collaborating with the Nazi. Anyone in the same position had little choices but to try to remain alive. She did more than that and for that reason she should be honoured for her heroism. I am full of admiration for the Jewish people time and time again when I see films such as this one.
- lena-valdeira
- Apr 8, 2007
- Permalink
- oliverdearlove
- Aug 24, 2016
- Permalink
This film is ok in parts but some of the acting is very poor .As is the storyline which becomes so rushed .No fear. No development of main characters .Some of the 9/10 reviews can't be genuine .It is nothing more than average .Even if the story is a serious one .
- ger55champ
- Jan 26, 2022
- Permalink
Jessica Beitchman as Marta Weiss was the most captivating character of this piece. Considering the company she's keeping in the movie (Christine Lahti, Beau Bridges, Richard Crenna) that is an incredible accomplishment. The movie was a touching yet horrifying account of a female Doctor in a WW II concentration camp. In it, Doctor Gisella Perl (Christine Lahti) helps Marta Weiss (Jessica Beitchman) while imprisoned together in Auschwitz and the two are reunited once again in America. When the American authorities suspect the good Doctor of voluntarily participating in experiments conducted by the "Angel of Death" Dr Josef Minghela, Perl must now rely on the testimony provided by young Marta Weiss to help free her in the land she came to be free in, America. It is the extraordinary tale of the holocaust survivors that came to the USA after enduring the unimaginable while trapped in Nazi occupied Europe in the 1940's.
- allmybiz123
- Sep 16, 2006
- Permalink
Friends, the subject matter was handled very well. Dr. Perl worked on her own redemption, something we all need do in this day and age.
The acting, cinematography, set design, costumes well done. In my lifetime I have lived with people who were at the "camps", heard the stories every one is compelling in its own way.
Some found redemption, some questioned why they survived well into their old age.
These stories must be shared and NOT FORGOTTEN. Yet, sadly by the overall rating this gem of a film presented, by its score, many can barely relate to the trials of complete subjugation and the lengths people go to stay alive.
This was a well done and ultimately positive movie.
The acting, cinematography, set design, costumes well done. In my lifetime I have lived with people who were at the "camps", heard the stories every one is compelling in its own way.
Some found redemption, some questioned why they survived well into their old age.
These stories must be shared and NOT FORGOTTEN. Yet, sadly by the overall rating this gem of a film presented, by its score, many can barely relate to the trials of complete subjugation and the lengths people go to stay alive.
This was a well done and ultimately positive movie.
- charlytully
- Dec 8, 2008
- Permalink
It is a TV movie based on the memoirs of a gynecologist from Auschwitz. This film is a linear and has two parts. The flashbacks to Auschwitz are nice and powerful, but the film's present-day sequences and the scenes where "Perl" questions his citizenship are contrived and tacky. The film wants to expose the viewer to judgment and position him, but it is not successful in this task and remains on the surface and is limited to sloganing dialogues. In general, the movie has nothing new to say, and reading the book it is adapted from is much more interesting And it is acceptable for broadcast on TV.
- hamid-r-goodarzi
- Jan 9, 2023
- Permalink