14 reviews
A geology consultant(John Corbett)teams with a city official(Jessica Beauchamp)to stop a sinkhole from enveloping New Orleans during Mardi Gras. Interesting story, but not enough special effects to support it. Most interesting is Brittany Daniel the niece of Beauchamp's character. HOT. Predictable finale. Also in the cast are Eugene Clark and Ron Gabriel.
- michaelRokeefe
- Dec 20, 2002
- Permalink
This movie is not pretentious so we do not have to judge it if it is. Nice storyline,mediocre acting and horrible special effects. 5 out of 10. A typical TV movie,if you have nothing else to do, check it out. I don't think this movie was made with a large budget and it clearly shows. It must say something about this movie that I have some difficulties to complete ten lines about it. Here goes,I don't consider John Corbet to be a good actor and he proofs it once again in this movie. He is just as bad as in Sex and the City, he never convinces. Who does convince is ms Steen as Allison Beauchamp, she probably will never perform in a large production but as her resume shows she'll easily reach her retirement as an actor.
- p88vincent
- Jan 11, 2005
- Permalink
- steeleronaldr
- Oct 13, 2020
- Permalink
RE: the acting: John Corbett is totally wasted. RE: the writing: SOMEONE was totally wasted when they wrote this, dude!
A) New Orleans sits well out into the Gulf of Mexico. There are no caverns under it; there is only sand and water. "on Hostile Mud" maybe; or "In Hostile Muck." But "ground?" I don't think so.
B) Liquid polyurethane fumes are toxic. Poor John would have stopped running and took a little nap long before he got out of the cave.
C) What's to stop the foam from continuing to expand after it surfaces? I envision the sequel as "The blob that ate New Orleans."
Why, oh why New Orleans? I would have gone with Orlando. They have sinkholes; the Magic Kingdom has parades; Brittany Daniel could wear a skin-tight white jumpsuit and look good ANYWHERE.
Reccommendation: Be totally wasted when you watch this.
A) New Orleans sits well out into the Gulf of Mexico. There are no caverns under it; there is only sand and water. "on Hostile Mud" maybe; or "In Hostile Muck." But "ground?" I don't think so.
B) Liquid polyurethane fumes are toxic. Poor John would have stopped running and took a little nap long before he got out of the cave.
C) What's to stop the foam from continuing to expand after it surfaces? I envision the sequel as "The blob that ate New Orleans."
Why, oh why New Orleans? I would have gone with Orlando. They have sinkholes; the Magic Kingdom has parades; Brittany Daniel could wear a skin-tight white jumpsuit and look good ANYWHERE.
Reccommendation: Be totally wasted when you watch this.
- cybertater
- May 20, 2004
- Permalink
This was one of the funniest movies I've seen in a long time. Too bad they weren't trying to make a comedy. I just couldn't get past the implausibility of the entire movie and the blaring inaccuracies. For example: the average elevation of New Orleans is below sea level, therefore you can't get very deep into the ground without finding water. The makers of this TV movie didn't seem to think that was important.
All in all, this was not a good movie. But at least they managed to stick every New Orleans stereotype into it and still have room for a pretty girl.
All in all, this was not a good movie. But at least they managed to stick every New Orleans stereotype into it and still have room for a pretty girl.
This movie suffers from the typical TV disaster movie formula. One man is trying to save an entire city, constantly working against self-serving politicians. The plot is totally predicable and the natural disaster in this movie was laughingly unrealistic (sinkholes in New Orleans).
If You haven't got anything else to do on a monday evening this could be something to waste Your time with. But be aware, it is more interesting to watch the news.
This is a typical american movie: Some guy discovers a potential disaster, nobody, especially the authorities believe him and he is proven to be right.
Trash.
This is a typical american movie: Some guy discovers a potential disaster, nobody, especially the authorities believe him and he is proven to be right.
Trash.
- henrik1424
- Oct 25, 2001
- Permalink
A familiar looking cast, one two of them, I think corbet was in my big fat Greek wedding and northern exposure? I haven't seen either and Brittany Daniel not to get confused with little black book, 8 mile brittany murphy. Now I have seen her in 90210 and broken lizards club dread. Anyway what I'm trying to say is it has a couple of minor stars that careers should have taken a dive after this landsfill grounded. The dialogue gets too detailed for a such a dumb big goofy disaster movie. I still don't know how or what the actual disaster was? Perhaps I misread the lines, and this is suppose to be a thinking mans disaster pic? We start to care about corbett towards the end, and think just maybe one cast member could be sacrificed...The stuff they fill holes with reminds me of evolution for some reason? Its situated in New orleans during mardi gra but the boys will be sad pressed to find what they're looking for. I watched it on TV so only saved $ just lost time.
- films_viewed
- Feb 22, 2006
- Permalink
- Woodyanders
- Nov 24, 2020
- Permalink
Utterly formulaic TV disaster movie in which New Orleans threatens to collapse in on itself as sinkholes open up under its streets at the height of Mardi Gras celebrations Naturally the straight arrow geologist is not believed as a devious majoral aide seeks to obscure evidence in order to avoid the cancellation of the parade
Bland actors,inadequate visual effects and a script that would only be mediocre if it improved by 200%
Why do movies like this get made at all? Who could possibly like them as they are inert and lifeless in every respect
Bland actors,inadequate visual effects and a script that would only be mediocre if it improved by 200%
Why do movies like this get made at all? Who could possibly like them as they are inert and lifeless in every respect
- lorenellroy
- Jun 4, 2002
- Permalink
This was a competent disaster movie, with a nail biting last 15 minutes or so.
The special effects were very good, and this type of thing could easily happen in any town or city in the world in the right conditions
I have read the other reviews and can only assume that the writers must have been watching another movie.
This was a nice, and very well made and plausible disaster movie. With a real nail biting ending.
This was certainly not a funny movie.
I rate this film 8 out of 10 easy.
The special effects were very good, and this type of thing could easily happen in any town or city in the world in the right conditions
I have read the other reviews and can only assume that the writers must have been watching another movie.
This was a nice, and very well made and plausible disaster movie. With a real nail biting ending.
This was certainly not a funny movie.
I rate this film 8 out of 10 easy.
- Moviegoround
- Oct 2, 2011
- Permalink
I have seen all of the recent crop of disaster films and just wish they would stop making them! Sinkholes?! Tornadoes and volcanoes can be scary, but sinkholes?! I can't get past the fact that moviemakers seem to have run out of ideas. In all fairness it was a cheap TV picture, but still, sinkholes?! Besides the weak natural disaster the movie follows every formula from every other movie of this type. The lead is afraid to evacuate due to some previous mistake, yet still has time for a love interest etc...
This movie seemed to be a Volcano sidekick, but after seeing it half n' half, I had to agree with myself that this was one of the funniest movies ever made... I don't know which catastrophy is worse, the movie or the one that the killer cookie dough is supposed to prevent... Someone hand me the chocolate chips, please!
- thitida-no-chey
- May 13, 2002
- Permalink