29 reviews
Oh, boy, it's another comet-hitting-the-earth film. Coming within a year or two of Deep Impact, Armageddon, Space Cowboys and various other stupid flicks with rap stars in them, you'd think people would be burned out on this concept. Apparently not, since I rented it, hoping it MIGHT not be awful: Dennis Hopper was in it, after all, and he's a good actor, right?
I forgot something important: along with Peter O'Toole, Robert De Niro and quite a few other esteemed actors, Hopper has a penchant for appearing in dreadful films. Not only that, but he seems to prepare for them by taking forget-how-to-act classes. His performance in Tychus is so awful that you expect Divine or Edith Massey to appear in some scenes.
I don't know what else to say about this rubbish, other than if you're into things crashing into the earth films, watch Deep Impact, and then Armageddon and Space Cowboys at a stretch. Forget the others altogether. This one really is bottom of the pile.
I forgot something important: along with Peter O'Toole, Robert De Niro and quite a few other esteemed actors, Hopper has a penchant for appearing in dreadful films. Not only that, but he seems to prepare for them by taking forget-how-to-act classes. His performance in Tychus is so awful that you expect Divine or Edith Massey to appear in some scenes.
I don't know what else to say about this rubbish, other than if you're into things crashing into the earth films, watch Deep Impact, and then Armageddon and Space Cowboys at a stretch. Forget the others altogether. This one really is bottom of the pile.
Basic fun movie but don't go expecting to see great effects, great acting and a great story. The special effects are OK but not very realistic. The acting is OK but nothing special. The story is OK but predictable. All in all, an OK movie if you have a few hours to spare with nothing better to do.
- The_Melancholic_Alcoholic
- Apr 15, 2006
- Permalink
I bought this movie in VHS for 25 cents in Canadian money... and it wasn't even worth it! Tycus is alike every catastrophic movie that you can watch for free on TV during a week day afternoon. I know that a VHS movie doesn't stop every 15 minutes because of ads but I it's not really an advantage. You see, at least ads would have kept me awake! Anyway... it just wasn't a good movie. And I didn't even mention the lesson they are trying to teach us... NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHO'S GOING TO LIVE AND WHO'S GOING TO DIE! That is not a spoiler, you'll ear that from the beginning to the end of the film... if you still want to see it. :P
Not only did the effects and acting in this movie bite, but the story was terrible.
A scientist discovers that a comet fragment will hit the moon ... world leaders ignore him ... he builds a shelter ... then, everyone is upset that he is "playing God".
How lame! He built the thing, why is everyone "entitled" to access? Totally lame story, don't waste your time!
A scientist discovers that a comet fragment will hit the moon ... world leaders ignore him ... he builds a shelter ... then, everyone is upset that he is "playing God".
How lame! He built the thing, why is everyone "entitled" to access? Totally lame story, don't waste your time!
- lordzedd-3
- Nov 28, 2006
- Permalink
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. My lifetime was drastically wasted by this pile of stink. I would rather chew off my arm than watch this film again. Painful story line, painful characters and a painful two hours.
The best way of describing this movie is a follows:- I would rather stick pins in my eyes and cut out my brain than watch another minute of this tripe.
Advice is to stay well clear and let your local dustman do you a favour of removing this rubbish.
Lin, you told me this was good!!!!
Goodaleebyeload.
The best way of describing this movie is a follows:- I would rather stick pins in my eyes and cut out my brain than watch another minute of this tripe.
Advice is to stay well clear and let your local dustman do you a favour of removing this rubbish.
Lin, you told me this was good!!!!
Goodaleebyeload.
- GeorgeSickler
- Sep 28, 2010
- Permalink
Unimpressive and extremely low budget sci-fi without any charm and appeal. Even the scenes related with the fall of the asteroids are stolen from other movies with the same plot. It's just a bad rip-off of "Asteroid" (with Annabela Sciora) and "Deep Impact" (with Morgan Freeman). Mr. Hopper seems to be anxious to slip away from this pointless and dull sci-fi entry.
I give this a 2 (two). And don't say I'm not a good guy!
I give this a 2 (two). And don't say I'm not a good guy!
For a movie shot in 18 days and a budget less than 2 million, this little movie that could deserves a 'best we could' award. Interesting premise (aside from the usual meteor stuff) with solid perfs by a cast of familiar faces. 2 thumbs up. Advice to the other reviewer: Don't be afraid to say you liked something.
- anonymous-1
- Jun 1, 1999
- Permalink
A £3.50 DVD can be a gamble and this was one that sort of paid off.
A decent Saturday Night type movie that entertains if you gloss over the obvious plot flaws. Special effects are a bit few and far between with some repetition (and why does London always look as if it's in the 60's ?)
If it had the budget of, say, Armageddon then I'm sure it would have performed better at the Box Office as the story is quite a good one.
Overall, Tycus is consigned to B movie history but if you see it for £3.50 then it's worth buying.
A decent Saturday Night type movie that entertains if you gloss over the obvious plot flaws. Special effects are a bit few and far between with some repetition (and why does London always look as if it's in the 60's ?)
If it had the budget of, say, Armageddon then I'm sure it would have performed better at the Box Office as the story is quite a good one.
Overall, Tycus is consigned to B movie history but if you see it for £3.50 then it's worth buying.
- Forever Damned
- Jun 14, 2002
- Permalink
Not another "comet hits the earth" movie I hear you say. Well, it's going to hit the moon, so I suppose it's slightly different this time.
Dennis Hopper is probably the best actor on the planet at playing an egotistical maniac, and as the scientist building his ark in this film he does it well as ever.
However, it's predictable and it's boring. So don't see it!
Dennis Hopper is probably the best actor on the planet at playing an egotistical maniac, and as the scientist building his ark in this film he does it well as ever.
However, it's predictable and it's boring. So don't see it!
Despite of what anybody mite say, I think that this was a very well done film, I really enjoyed it. Dennis Hopper was great in his part, his character was so carm during the film, which is so cool in films. I think that this film doesent get the credit it deserves. I really enjoy those end of the world movies.
8/10
8/10
- mr_pivac1985
- Feb 26, 2003
- Permalink
This movie is a science fiction about an asteroid hitting the moon and it's aftermath.
The movie is one of the worst movie I have ever seen and this movie is bad in all the departments be it acting, direction, screenplay or script.
The best thing is to ignore the movie
The movie is one of the worst movie I have ever seen and this movie is bad in all the departments be it acting, direction, screenplay or script.
The best thing is to ignore the movie
- sauravjoshi85
- Jun 9, 2019
- Permalink
Tycus is one of the worst films direct to video films that I see ever.
I am not amazing that this product does not appearing at the cinema.Bad Visual effects (The start is dreadful)Bad actors (I don´t understand Why appear in this film the great Dennis Hopper)and Bad screen Without sense.My alternative:Armaggedon or Twister. SENTENCE FOR TYCUS:Do not watch this film.
I am not amazing that this product does not appearing at the cinema.Bad Visual effects (The start is dreadful)Bad actors (I don´t understand Why appear in this film the great Dennis Hopper)and Bad screen Without sense.My alternative:Armaggedon or Twister. SENTENCE FOR TYCUS:Do not watch this film.
- SUPERNOVA HEIGHTS
- Jul 23, 2001
- Permalink
I have read all of the reviews for this direct to video movie. I can agree that the movie is not "Armageddon" or "Deep Impact" quality. Nevertheless, if you are looking for a way to pass ninety minutes or so, then this is a movie that is bearable.
I started looking at the film early in the AM hours as I was doing some geek stuff. It was very nice, because I was able to switch back and forth between what I was doing and watching the movie, with out missing a beat. It is a predictable movie, and the acting is not up to par for some of the veteran actors (for instance, Dennis Hopper).
But I should point out that I paid only $2 (US) and as the old adage goes: You get what you pay for! If you are looking for some deep meaning movie that will have you have to watching it over and over again, then this is definitely the long video. On the other hand, if you looking for something to pass the time, then there is nothing wrong with Tycus (Which incidentally was called "Comet: Final Impact" in Mexico where I found this video).
I started looking at the film early in the AM hours as I was doing some geek stuff. It was very nice, because I was able to switch back and forth between what I was doing and watching the movie, with out missing a beat. It is a predictable movie, and the acting is not up to par for some of the veteran actors (for instance, Dennis Hopper).
But I should point out that I paid only $2 (US) and as the old adage goes: You get what you pay for! If you are looking for some deep meaning movie that will have you have to watching it over and over again, then this is definitely the long video. On the other hand, if you looking for something to pass the time, then there is nothing wrong with Tycus (Which incidentally was called "Comet: Final Impact" in Mexico where I found this video).
- simon2tausend
- Jul 29, 2006
- Permalink
I actually enjoyed Tycus, if not for much more than mocking the production values. Dennis Hopper was just fine, although I wonder if he would have signed on the project had he seen the special effects they used. And furthermore, what was with the scene with the ninja?? That was just completely out of pace. Perhaps someone came up with the bright idea mid-shooting. Oh well, This movie is great if you're drunk and need a good laugh. Cheers.
This movie, I can barely even call it that, is badly done in nearly every way that is possible.
The color is acceptable. The photography is acceptable. The sound is sufficient. But every thing else is terrible or nearly terrible.
The writing varies from pointless to incomprehensible to just plain badly done.
The acting is almost passable some of the time but often is just nothing, neither good nor bad, just nothing.
The characters all seem entirely miscast!
The editing is not good, things are confusing but not to be interesting, just clumsy and confusing.
The director is responsible for everything that being the job of the director and the directing is bad. Even the costumes seem wrong at times and/or just annoying also.
It could have been a decent entertaining movie even with a not very original plot. Instead it is just very bad.
Well at least some tech people made some wages for awhile making the thing. That is one small, very small, saving grace.
The color is acceptable. The photography is acceptable. The sound is sufficient. But every thing else is terrible or nearly terrible.
The writing varies from pointless to incomprehensible to just plain badly done.
The acting is almost passable some of the time but often is just nothing, neither good nor bad, just nothing.
The characters all seem entirely miscast!
The editing is not good, things are confusing but not to be interesting, just clumsy and confusing.
The director is responsible for everything that being the job of the director and the directing is bad. Even the costumes seem wrong at times and/or just annoying also.
It could have been a decent entertaining movie even with a not very original plot. Instead it is just very bad.
Well at least some tech people made some wages for awhile making the thing. That is one small, very small, saving grace.
- robinwhiteart-415-756085
- Aug 24, 2024
- Permalink
One must place aside the core of the story with the confines of the security mine in order to save a certain amount of people from the catastrophe yet to accur shorty in the chapter of their lives. We must, therefore, concentrate on the comet impact from striking the moon and delivering its payload of death on the earth. I wish to remark on the special affects on buildings and surroundings with the most horrifying devastation to humankind . If such a demonic occurrence from the cosmic depths actually happened, and I most certainly believe that it will, then the film, Tycus, will be excepted as a valuable asset to our knowledge.
- Starlifter
- Oct 15, 2006
- Permalink
First off, the reviewers who gave this one star either went in with crazy expectations, or are just haters. I'd gave this a 5 rating overall, but listed a 7 to counter the 1's. This isnt a big budget affair, but they did a great job with what they were given. The FX, production value, and sets were solid enough and better than a lot of other disaster films of this type of genre. I will agree with one commenter that stated the film lead was annoying- he was, but Ed Hopper countered him with his standard film presence. I actually thought this was a decent film and happy to pick it up for my scifi collection for 2 dollars.
- dislocatedego
- Feb 2, 2024
- Permalink
What a bad reccomendation! I started watching the first 20 minutes of it, and I just couldn't take the horrible acting, production value (CAMERA!!), and SCRIPT!!! And everything else... It looks like a shabby made-for TV episode, without spirit or feel. Cliche American characters make this one a movie to stop watching 20 minutes in... because I sometimes feel like my life has been wasted. At least it was only wasted for 20 minutes or so instead of a couple hours.
I don't care if this movie has some cool ideas, like asteroids hitting Earth and people living underground. It is done horribly, so it doesn't get any points outta me. If I feel my time has been wasted, how can a movie be at all good?
Yeah, this is definetly a direct-to-video release, and am surprised a person like Dennis Hopper would voluntarily be in this movie. Is he friends with the scriptwriter or something?????
I don't care if this movie has some cool ideas, like asteroids hitting Earth and people living underground. It is done horribly, so it doesn't get any points outta me. If I feel my time has been wasted, how can a movie be at all good?
Yeah, this is definetly a direct-to-video release, and am surprised a person like Dennis Hopper would voluntarily be in this movie. Is he friends with the scriptwriter or something?????
- winstonsmith_84
- May 30, 2002
- Permalink