195 reviews
I thought this was a notch above the normal no-brainer kick-boxer action flicks which star men like Jean-Claude VanDamme, Steven Segal, Chuck Norris, Jackie Chan, etc. because of the interesting and somewhat complex tale with time travel as the main theme. The story also has some good twists and humor.
THE GOOD - Kudos to the four s's in here: Silver, suspense, special-effects and sound - all of them are very good. There is something about Ron Silver's looks that spell "sleazy and rotten" before he even opens his mouth! When he speaks, his accent and profanity quickly verifies those suspicions. The special- effects - at least when this came out in the mid '90s - were very cool when the time travelers reached their destinations and appear out of this wall of near- transparent plastic. The story can be a bit confusing at times but is fun at most times, especially near the end when doubles of all the characters are on the screen at once
THE BAD - The bad part of the film is the credibility, especially with Silver who plays a politician. No politician, no matter what party or where, would be this much of low-life. In fact, the story is full of unlikable and untrustworthy characters, too many of them. There also is too much Rambo-mentality and the final action goes on way too long. The time travel ange of the story may be intelligent but the dialog in this movie is just plain dumb and too juvenile.
Overall, this is one of the best of a small group of well-done Van Damme movies.
THE GOOD - Kudos to the four s's in here: Silver, suspense, special-effects and sound - all of them are very good. There is something about Ron Silver's looks that spell "sleazy and rotten" before he even opens his mouth! When he speaks, his accent and profanity quickly verifies those suspicions. The special- effects - at least when this came out in the mid '90s - were very cool when the time travelers reached their destinations and appear out of this wall of near- transparent plastic. The story can be a bit confusing at times but is fun at most times, especially near the end when doubles of all the characters are on the screen at once
THE BAD - The bad part of the film is the credibility, especially with Silver who plays a politician. No politician, no matter what party or where, would be this much of low-life. In fact, the story is full of unlikable and untrustworthy characters, too many of them. There also is too much Rambo-mentality and the final action goes on way too long. The time travel ange of the story may be intelligent but the dialog in this movie is just plain dumb and too juvenile.
Overall, this is one of the best of a small group of well-done Van Damme movies.
- ccthemovieman-1
- Aug 29, 2006
- Permalink
When time travel was developed by a scientist in 1994, there was the need to create the Time Enforcement Commision (TEC) under the control of Senator Aaron McComb (Ron Silver) to protect the past from modifications. The police office Max Walker (Jean-Claude Van Damme) is invited to join the TEC, and when his wife Melissa (Mia Sara) is murdered by strangers, he accepts the invitation to work under the command of Eugene Matuzak (Bruce McGill). In 2004, Walker is assigned to capture his former partner Lyle Atwood (Jason Schombing) that is manipulating the stock market in 1929. Atwood tells that he is working for Senator McComb, who is a powerful politician that is running for president. Atwood prefers to die and does not confess that McComb is a criminal. Now Max knows the truth but McComb is changing the past and Max does not know how stop him.
"Timecop" is a highly entertaining film, despite the clichés and the inconsistencies. Most of the scenes are written to explore Van Damme´s skill with fights. Ron Silver performs his usual villain roleand is very effective. But better of turn your brain off and enjoy "Timecop". My vote is six.
Title (Brazil): "Timecop - O Guardião do Tempo" ("Timecop - The Guardian of Time")
"Timecop" is a highly entertaining film, despite the clichés and the inconsistencies. Most of the scenes are written to explore Van Damme´s skill with fights. Ron Silver performs his usual villain roleand is very effective. But better of turn your brain off and enjoy "Timecop". My vote is six.
Title (Brazil): "Timecop - O Guardião do Tempo" ("Timecop - The Guardian of Time")
- claudio_carvalho
- Dec 21, 2017
- Permalink
I love how all reviews complain about the lack of logic in the time travel rules of this movie.
They all live in a time before Tenet.
They all live in a time before Tenet.
- spamcatcher-10034
- May 26, 2021
- Permalink
A few reviewers here need to chill out. 'Tis true, Hyams is no Kubrick, even an infusion of the great man's DNA wouldn't guarantee his next flick would rise above plebian mediocrity. So what? Does Hyams aspire to creative brilliance? or does he just make films at his own pace and at his own level of artistic creativity, which after all is his right to do. If there are those who look down from their own lofty pedestals frowning upon what they see as ungilded simplicity well - whoopy do, go shoot your own celestial Heart of Darkness - make your point that way!
For my money, TIMECOP achieved exactly what it set out to achieve...value for your $12.95 whatever. Certainly no cerebral rush, but honest entertainment nonetheless. I rather doubt the Van Damme brigade were looking for some kinda kick-ass Yoda with nunchukas. Hyams delivered his requisite quota of high kicks per dollar and exploding blood capsules per reel.
The imdb rating for this film is laughable...it rates a minimum of 6.6!
For my money, TIMECOP achieved exactly what it set out to achieve...value for your $12.95 whatever. Certainly no cerebral rush, but honest entertainment nonetheless. I rather doubt the Van Damme brigade were looking for some kinda kick-ass Yoda with nunchukas. Hyams delivered his requisite quota of high kicks per dollar and exploding blood capsules per reel.
The imdb rating for this film is laughable...it rates a minimum of 6.6!
This is pretty run-of-the-mill as far as sci-fi goes, and Van-Damme's acting wasn't any better than it was in his other films - contrary to popular opinion - but Peter Hyams' competent direction keeps the thing moving forward at a brisk pace, and Ron Silver makes for a wicked baddie that rivals his work in Blue Steel. If only the action were more exciting. Most of it consists of Walker staying in one position shooting at another guy, and vice-versa until somebody goes down for good. The shootouts lack energy and a sense of life for the most part. The fight scenes are......okay, but nothing that can compete with what I've seen in other actioners from that era. Oh yeah, and what was up with the villain's death scene? That was some frighteningly terrible CGI. I guess they were trying to rival the liquid metal effects in T2 and failed miserably. In fact, the entire finale was way too dark, like pitch black. I remember catching the finale on TV back in the day and noticed it was excessively dark then, too, but Blu-ray doesn't seem to have corrected the problem. Well, flaws aside, this is still one of Van Damme's better films, with some amusing moments here and there.
- malkane316
- May 6, 2005
- Permalink
A film of this genre will more often than not have plot flaws. And this one indeed had plot flaws galore, but ultimately it was good fun and very entertaining. The unanswered questions can easily be overseen by the sheer entertainment value the film provides. It has great sets, great action, and interesting enough plot and you get the opportunity to see Van Damme in top form. The visuals are good for its time and there's loads of action! I did find the music loud and overbearing at times.
- paulclaassen
- Jul 8, 2018
- Permalink
This is one of those movies where the trailer has all the spectacular shots but when you see the actual film there is too much talking and meandering for an action film. For example I remember J-C doing the split, and when he's almost run over by a truck, from the tv commercial at the time when it was new. Those images make me feel hopeful that the movie might be better than I remember...but every time I watch it again it's even more boring than I remembered! I've always wanted to like this movie because I like Van Damme, and the movie title and poster are cool, but even when I saw it as a teenager and was perhaps more forgiving towards mediocre action movies I already thought it was a lukewarm movie. Only recommended for biggest Van Damme fans really.
- SkullScreamerReturns
- Feb 15, 2024
- Permalink
I was not to crazy when I saw this film the first time. Wow the second time I found the time travel cool. This film is cool when one looks at the plot twists. Not the greatest of action flicks, but a lot better then most. Watch it twice if you rent it and you will catch a few extra things.
There's an audience for Van Damme, Seagal and Co. And I am not in their number, except when exhausted and
looking for very light entertainment. At the time of its release this Van Damme movie had a memorable trailer, with two impressive scenes, one the amazing split in the kitchen and the other his character's appearance from a time warp in front of a speeding truck.
It made me want to watch it, also because I am a fan of time travel stories. It starts strong with a decent scene between Van Damme, as Walker, and Mia Sara as his wife, but unfortunately it derails with the introduction of the time travel twist, taking the audience abruptly back to 1929 and then back and forward between 1994 and 2004. Walker must fight the villain played by Ron Silver, an actor specialised in playing sleazy, but there's little logic in the development and most fight scenes drag on too long to give the audience a chance to enjoy Muscles from Brussels fighting skills.
Van Damme's skills are indeed impressive, but I also got bored to see faces getting smashed and guys shot at, the last fight scene in the dark being particularly overlong and peppered with silly dialogues. Still worth a shot and you can fast forward some fight scenes.
It made me want to watch it, also because I am a fan of time travel stories. It starts strong with a decent scene between Van Damme, as Walker, and Mia Sara as his wife, but unfortunately it derails with the introduction of the time travel twist, taking the audience abruptly back to 1929 and then back and forward between 1994 and 2004. Walker must fight the villain played by Ron Silver, an actor specialised in playing sleazy, but there's little logic in the development and most fight scenes drag on too long to give the audience a chance to enjoy Muscles from Brussels fighting skills.
Van Damme's skills are indeed impressive, but I also got bored to see faces getting smashed and guys shot at, the last fight scene in the dark being particularly overlong and peppered with silly dialogues. Still worth a shot and you can fast forward some fight scenes.
Timecop (1994) is my favorite Van Damme action sci-fi classic! Just Like Sylvester Stallone's Judge Dredd, Van Damme's Timecop is very Underrated action sci-fi flick ever. One of my favorite and serious Van Damme's roles in this film. Great travel time, great action, great villains and great story. I love the fighting sequences as well. One of my favorite action movie flicks till this days. It was directed from Peter Hyams who become a good friend with Van Damme and a year later he directed Sudden Death with Van Damme. He was the only one of the directors who come visit Van Damme in hospital after he got injured. His son years later directed two Universal Soldier film sequels. I love this movie to death and it is my 6th favorite best Van Damme movie.
What I meant in the top written: "to take a few sci-fi leaps of faith" This movie involves time travel about a cop who travels from 2004 to 1994 and try's to prevent the death of his wife and change the future. It does involve travel into the past, so it immediately presents a time-travel paradox which can't really be resolved. Timecop (1994) is very underrated film, there was a sequel and a short-lived ABC series. I watched the sequel without Van Damme in it and the sequel sucked. In here you have nice realistic martial arts and action. You have a lot of explosions and it also involves conspiracy. Ron Silver did an excellent joy playing a villain in this movie as Senator McComb. Mia Sara was absolutely wonderful as Max's (Van Damme's) wife Melissa.
Timecop is more classic. Half-n-half sci-fi/action films get lost beneath pure action and pure sci-fi but Timecop is top shelf. This was another childhood movie. I actually rented on a VHS tape in the 90's my parents paid me for the VHS tape so I could watch this movie. I like this movie a lot. I have it on Blu-ray in my Van Damme collection. I have grew up with this movie and it was a hit in 1994 when it was released out. Today I love it so much. The film is a lot smarter than people give it credit for. I also think Van Damme definitely deserves some credit for his non-action scenes in this film, but I suppose his performance in this film will always be remembered for that splits scene. The movie it self has a good look, action and effects and very good acting performance by Van Damme, you really feel bad for him and want to see him kick bad guys asses. Also I think that this movie has Van Damme's best hairstyle. That mullet Is the best he ever had, not the one in Hard Target. And yes, this movie, like many other Van Damme classics deserves a special edition.
Not only this movie is my favorite best Van Damme movie, it is one of those movies that you watch over and over again and never gets tiring . A lot of my friends that I know in real life, loves this movie. Someone said it is even the best one. Honestly this is the third time Van Damme played in a science fiction movie. The first time was in cyborg (1989) and the second time was in Universal Soldier. I never really liked Cyborg, but I absolutely love this movie. The action sequences where amazing, the fight scenes and Van Damme martial arts where very realistic. I always enjoy watching Timecop. I enjoy the story, the concept and the action. I think this film is beginning, to get a bad wrap from the general audience. like "oh it is cheesy". "oh its a guilty pleasure at best" that's stupid! This film deserves a special edition in some way.
That is the more or less basic plot, In order to even try watching this movie, you MUST LOOK PAST THE PARADOX. If you don't, this movie has zero credibility, and is not worth your time. The paradox in leap faith of this movie is also that works so well and fits with the story. Jean-Claude Van Damme was great. In my opinion, this was one of his best performances. I also liked the opening scene and the scene in which he goes back to 1929 to arrest his partner.
What I meant in the top written: "to take a few sci-fi leaps of faith" This movie involves time travel about a cop who travels from 2004 to 1994 and try's to prevent the death of his wife and change the future. It does involve travel into the past, so it immediately presents a time-travel paradox which can't really be resolved. Timecop (1994) is very underrated film, there was a sequel and a short-lived ABC series. I watched the sequel without Van Damme in it and the sequel sucked. In here you have nice realistic martial arts and action. You have a lot of explosions and it also involves conspiracy. Ron Silver did an excellent joy playing a villain in this movie as Senator McComb. Mia Sara was absolutely wonderful as Max's (Van Damme's) wife Melissa.
Timecop is more classic. Half-n-half sci-fi/action films get lost beneath pure action and pure sci-fi but Timecop is top shelf. This was another childhood movie. I actually rented on a VHS tape in the 90's my parents paid me for the VHS tape so I could watch this movie. I like this movie a lot. I have it on Blu-ray in my Van Damme collection. I have grew up with this movie and it was a hit in 1994 when it was released out. Today I love it so much. The film is a lot smarter than people give it credit for. I also think Van Damme definitely deserves some credit for his non-action scenes in this film, but I suppose his performance in this film will always be remembered for that splits scene. The movie it self has a good look, action and effects and very good acting performance by Van Damme, you really feel bad for him and want to see him kick bad guys asses. Also I think that this movie has Van Damme's best hairstyle. That mullet Is the best he ever had, not the one in Hard Target. And yes, this movie, like many other Van Damme classics deserves a special edition.
Not only this movie is my favorite best Van Damme movie, it is one of those movies that you watch over and over again and never gets tiring . A lot of my friends that I know in real life, loves this movie. Someone said it is even the best one. Honestly this is the third time Van Damme played in a science fiction movie. The first time was in cyborg (1989) and the second time was in Universal Soldier. I never really liked Cyborg, but I absolutely love this movie. The action sequences where amazing, the fight scenes and Van Damme martial arts where very realistic. I always enjoy watching Timecop. I enjoy the story, the concept and the action. I think this film is beginning, to get a bad wrap from the general audience. like "oh it is cheesy". "oh its a guilty pleasure at best" that's stupid! This film deserves a special edition in some way.
That is the more or less basic plot, In order to even try watching this movie, you MUST LOOK PAST THE PARADOX. If you don't, this movie has zero credibility, and is not worth your time. The paradox in leap faith of this movie is also that works so well and fits with the story. Jean-Claude Van Damme was great. In my opinion, this was one of his best performances. I also liked the opening scene and the scene in which he goes back to 1929 to arrest his partner.
- ivo-cobra8
- Dec 29, 2015
- Permalink
Overall, this is a decent enough 90s action flick with ropey acting, terrible vision of the future, but excellent fight scenes and some superb signs of physical excellence (those gymnast moves are amazing). Its also funny (not always intentionally so; those cars are hilarious) and the pacing is decent. The sci-fi angle is not the strongest, but overall this is a cent 90s action flick.
As far as Van Damme movies go, this isn't that bad. When he doesn't have to actually act too much (like Bloodsport), he's watchable.
As far as movies about time travel go, this movie ranks right down there with the bottom. Not only is it less feasible then other movies like Terminator and even Back to the Future, the movie contradicts itself too many times considering how short it is.
As far as all movies go, don't waste your money, unless you're a huge Van Damme fan. The action is good. But a so-so plot, sub-par acting, and amateur directing make this movie very forgettable.
As far as movies about time travel go, this movie ranks right down there with the bottom. Not only is it less feasible then other movies like Terminator and even Back to the Future, the movie contradicts itself too many times considering how short it is.
As far as all movies go, don't waste your money, unless you're a huge Van Damme fan. The action is good. But a so-so plot, sub-par acting, and amateur directing make this movie very forgettable.
This was actually a decent film. If you can get past the gratuitous violence (a virtual requirement for Van Damme films), you might like this movie. Van Damme plays the title character who needs to stop a crooked politician from changing history while trying to decide whether to save his murdered wife. I liked this. Silver is good as the bad guy, and Van Damme is watchable. See it if you get the chance! *** out of ****
Jean-Claude made quite a doozy with this one, quite possibly his best film ever. Sure, Lionheart ranks pretty high up there, but this one not only had good special effects, the story was actually respectable. But the downfall of most of Van Damme's movie is the fact he tries to be an actor. If Van Damme just kicked kung-fu butt all the time, his movies would rank up there with the best fo the genre. Anyway, a cool movie and certainly worth watching.
- Leofwine_draca
- Nov 13, 2016
- Permalink
This film is amazing in it's own special way. To begin with, the fight scenes were good, definitely above average. If only the rest of the film were like that!
The characters are one dimensional cliches, and often do ludicrous and stupid things for no real reason apart from being able to thrust a certain prop at the audience, just to make sure even the chairs understand what happened/will happen. Forget the decades of knowledge about how to do that in a subtle, non-insulting way! This would be fine in a comedy film, but the film gives no indication that it's trying to play that angle meaning the audience laughs at the film, not with it.
Time travel films have a habit of eventually running into plot holes, but this one has a plot canyon, with occasional bits of continuity sticking out of it. The entire plot unravels at several points if examined too closely, largely due to no one trying to come up with a consistent set of rules for time travel before writing.
The special effects are mixed. The practical effects are either okay or good, either way the create the desired effect. However, this was still in the early days of CGI, like Lawnmower Man, so any computer animated effects look anywhere between dated and terrifyingly jarring. That said, there is the excuse that CGI was still in its infancy.
Overall, it was fun to watch, mainly for how bizarre and unintentionally funny it became in places. 2/10
The characters are one dimensional cliches, and often do ludicrous and stupid things for no real reason apart from being able to thrust a certain prop at the audience, just to make sure even the chairs understand what happened/will happen. Forget the decades of knowledge about how to do that in a subtle, non-insulting way! This would be fine in a comedy film, but the film gives no indication that it's trying to play that angle meaning the audience laughs at the film, not with it.
Time travel films have a habit of eventually running into plot holes, but this one has a plot canyon, with occasional bits of continuity sticking out of it. The entire plot unravels at several points if examined too closely, largely due to no one trying to come up with a consistent set of rules for time travel before writing.
The special effects are mixed. The practical effects are either okay or good, either way the create the desired effect. However, this was still in the early days of CGI, like Lawnmower Man, so any computer animated effects look anywhere between dated and terrifyingly jarring. That said, there is the excuse that CGI was still in its infancy.
Overall, it was fun to watch, mainly for how bizarre and unintentionally funny it became in places. 2/10
- benjaminweber
- Jun 6, 2018
- Permalink
Once again I've taken a trip down memory lane and revisited a movie I haven't seen in years. Sometimes you find that a movie you revisit is as good as you remember. Fewer times you'll find that the movie was better than you remember. Most of the time you'll find that the movie is worst than you remember. Timecop is of the third category.
I love time travel and time loop movies. It is such a fascinating concept and can be done in a myriad of ways. But time travel and time loop movies are delicate and need to be handled with care. As it is these movies will be flawed because there is always a conundrum with time travel. One example of a time travel conundrum would be:
If I stub my toe and go back in time one minute to prevent myself from stubbing my toe, thereby removing the impetus for my time travel, did I ever go back in time? Did I ever stub my toe?
So, because of inherent conundrums like this there will always be flaws in time travel movies. But having said that, some movies are more flawed than others and Timecop is on the more flawed side.
The premise of Timecop is simple: time travel exists but an agency is needed to prevent tampering with the past because of the well known ripple effect that can and will occur. This agency called the TEC (Time Enforcement Commission) has the technology to monitor history looking for irregular activity (how they monitor the entirety of history I don't know). If they detect any big irregularities they send an agent back to prevent the temporal tampering.
There were a lot of problems I had with the movie with Jean-Claude Van Damme's acting being at the top of the list. When I was younger I could watch one JCVD flick after another completely ignoring his terrible acting just to see him kick the crap out of somebody. Well, now in my older years I want more than splits, kicks and fighting with dozens of jump cuts to make it look more spectacular. But putting JCVD aside the movie still had flaws that bothered me; the biggest being the breadcrumbs left everywhere. What do I mean by that? If you're going back to the past to alter it for whatever reason, knowing the potential impacts it could have on the future you'd have to have as little futuristic items on your person as possible. You wouldn't want someone in 1960 getting their hands on your iPhone; or worse, your world history book. Timecop was a little too sloppy with that.
Then there is the other time travel conundrum that's never done right:
If I go back to the past to alter something, the moment I alter it my memories should be altered likewise.
For whatever reason, whenever a time traveler goes to the past, then alters something, then returns to the present, his memories are unchanged. He discovers all of the new events as if he just arrived on the planet that day.
My point in it all is that "Timecop" had the regular time travel flaws and then some. But even with those flaws I still rate it a 6/10 because this is a 20+ year old movie now!! This is from my younger and more innocent years, I can't just completely dump on it. Back then JCVD was the man even if he preferred his feet when a gun was more effective. Furthermore, this was an early time travel movie when all people had as a reference was "Back to the Future," "Terminator" and "Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure." The inconsistencies in this movie were trivial in 1994. Timecop is not the best time travel movie--or any kind of movie--but it's still cool
I love time travel and time loop movies. It is such a fascinating concept and can be done in a myriad of ways. But time travel and time loop movies are delicate and need to be handled with care. As it is these movies will be flawed because there is always a conundrum with time travel. One example of a time travel conundrum would be:
If I stub my toe and go back in time one minute to prevent myself from stubbing my toe, thereby removing the impetus for my time travel, did I ever go back in time? Did I ever stub my toe?
So, because of inherent conundrums like this there will always be flaws in time travel movies. But having said that, some movies are more flawed than others and Timecop is on the more flawed side.
The premise of Timecop is simple: time travel exists but an agency is needed to prevent tampering with the past because of the well known ripple effect that can and will occur. This agency called the TEC (Time Enforcement Commission) has the technology to monitor history looking for irregular activity (how they monitor the entirety of history I don't know). If they detect any big irregularities they send an agent back to prevent the temporal tampering.
There were a lot of problems I had with the movie with Jean-Claude Van Damme's acting being at the top of the list. When I was younger I could watch one JCVD flick after another completely ignoring his terrible acting just to see him kick the crap out of somebody. Well, now in my older years I want more than splits, kicks and fighting with dozens of jump cuts to make it look more spectacular. But putting JCVD aside the movie still had flaws that bothered me; the biggest being the breadcrumbs left everywhere. What do I mean by that? If you're going back to the past to alter it for whatever reason, knowing the potential impacts it could have on the future you'd have to have as little futuristic items on your person as possible. You wouldn't want someone in 1960 getting their hands on your iPhone; or worse, your world history book. Timecop was a little too sloppy with that.
Then there is the other time travel conundrum that's never done right:
If I go back to the past to alter something, the moment I alter it my memories should be altered likewise.
For whatever reason, whenever a time traveler goes to the past, then alters something, then returns to the present, his memories are unchanged. He discovers all of the new events as if he just arrived on the planet that day.
My point in it all is that "Timecop" had the regular time travel flaws and then some. But even with those flaws I still rate it a 6/10 because this is a 20+ year old movie now!! This is from my younger and more innocent years, I can't just completely dump on it. Back then JCVD was the man even if he preferred his feet when a gun was more effective. Furthermore, this was an early time travel movie when all people had as a reference was "Back to the Future," "Terminator" and "Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure." The inconsistencies in this movie were trivial in 1994. Timecop is not the best time travel movie--or any kind of movie--but it's still cool
- view_and_review
- Dec 13, 2017
- Permalink
I only made it through the first few minutes, for good reasons.
At the beginning, there's a meeting where the guy says it's impossible to go forward in time because it hasn't happened yet - not true - hasn't he heard of Eintstein's theory of relativity? He then says you can go back in time 'because it's already happened' (which isn't an explanation of anything) - furthermore, backwards time travel is as doubtful now in 2008 as it was in 1994 when the film was made. Then he contradicts himself by claiming someone jumped forward in time to buy arms with gold bullion.
He says the age of the gold bullion was determined by carbon dating. Firstly if something jumped forward in time, then the process of carbon isotope decay would be skipped. Secondly, there isn't an awful lot of carbon in gold! I am willing to suspend belief when I watch science fiction, but it needs to come up with an explanation that is just a little bit plausible or keep it pure fantasy and miss out so-called scientific explanations. If the writer can't be bothered to do some basic research, then I'm not interested in anything else this idiot has to say.
At the beginning, there's a meeting where the guy says it's impossible to go forward in time because it hasn't happened yet - not true - hasn't he heard of Eintstein's theory of relativity? He then says you can go back in time 'because it's already happened' (which isn't an explanation of anything) - furthermore, backwards time travel is as doubtful now in 2008 as it was in 1994 when the film was made. Then he contradicts himself by claiming someone jumped forward in time to buy arms with gold bullion.
He says the age of the gold bullion was determined by carbon dating. Firstly if something jumped forward in time, then the process of carbon isotope decay would be skipped. Secondly, there isn't an awful lot of carbon in gold! I am willing to suspend belief when I watch science fiction, but it needs to come up with an explanation that is just a little bit plausible or keep it pure fantasy and miss out so-called scientific explanations. If the writer can't be bothered to do some basic research, then I'm not interested in anything else this idiot has to say.
I do not normally go in for flying feet and the like. Usually, they are associated with dubbed voices. However, in this film, everything came together to create great entertainment and a thought-provoking story. Van Damme had to be more than himself and the interaction between Van Damme, Mia Sara, and Ron Silver, not to mention others, is worth the ticket price.
The title is "Timecop." And that is what Max Walker is. More than once he must thwart the efforts of Senator Aaron McComb who has found a new source of soft money. There are the ever-present time enigmas to deal with and in the process, you cannot tell the good guys from the bad as they all dress in black.
The title is "Timecop." And that is what Max Walker is. More than once he must thwart the efforts of Senator Aaron McComb who has found a new source of soft money. There are the ever-present time enigmas to deal with and in the process, you cannot tell the good guys from the bad as they all dress in black.
- Bernie4444
- Apr 27, 2024
- Permalink
There isn't much to say about TIMECOP that hasn't been said before. I must admit that this film has devised the most pragmatic situation (to date) that allows Van Damme to perform his famed splits. I never thought I would see a film where it was not gratuitously blatant or forced. I am speaking, of course, of the fight sequence in the kitchen, where he avoids electrocution by the means detailed above; it is simply exceptional work. Kudos to Michael Richardson who wrote the screenplay and to Peter Hyams for his powerful direction of this scene. A special credit goes to Jean-Claude Van Damme, who has remained limber enough after years of opulent living, still able to position his legs at a straight angle for all the world to ponder. Truly, poetry in motion.
The scene where Van Damme does the splits real good like: 10/10; the incredulous film overall: 3/10.
The scene where Van Damme does the splits real good like: 10/10; the incredulous film overall: 3/10.
- underfire35
- Mar 6, 2003
- Permalink
Timecop is probably remembered as his last good movie before he got into a rut of mediocre(though successful) action flicks.Its also the most mainstream picture he was ever in for my money.
In 1994 Time-travel has become a possible reality.Washington decides that it needs to be "policed" from criminal activity and the paradox's of undoing life as we know it.Cut to 2004:Enter Van Damme as Walker the on-the-rocks time-cop who uncovers a plot to swindle the presidency by a corrupt Senator McComb played by Ron Silver,who actually engineered the murder of Walkers-wife(Mia Sara).Can Max stop McComb?Can he go back and save his wife?After some decent gunfights and roundhouses you'll have to find out.
Timecop benefits from having a talented director Like Peter Hyams behind the wheel for this one.He stages everything well,Keeps the action and plot flowing,Special FX are engaging,and gets a very good performance by Van Damme.Who comes off vulnerable and like a real person.The production values are very good here too.It is also pretty decent political backdrop/Sci-fi combo.
Ron Silver is a great Bad Guy here as McComb.He gets to shoot, beat people up,Snarls And looks frankly maniacal at times.Mia Sara is engaging and looks beautiful as ever.Bruce McGill has some funny bits as Van Dammes Boss.The very sexy Gloria Ruben also shows up as Walkers new partner.
Timecop is not the greatest when it comes to plot-holes.But unlike the recent version of HG Wells Time machine, it is a very fun movie.And one of Van Dammes best.
In 1994 Time-travel has become a possible reality.Washington decides that it needs to be "policed" from criminal activity and the paradox's of undoing life as we know it.Cut to 2004:Enter Van Damme as Walker the on-the-rocks time-cop who uncovers a plot to swindle the presidency by a corrupt Senator McComb played by Ron Silver,who actually engineered the murder of Walkers-wife(Mia Sara).Can Max stop McComb?Can he go back and save his wife?After some decent gunfights and roundhouses you'll have to find out.
Timecop benefits from having a talented director Like Peter Hyams behind the wheel for this one.He stages everything well,Keeps the action and plot flowing,Special FX are engaging,and gets a very good performance by Van Damme.Who comes off vulnerable and like a real person.The production values are very good here too.It is also pretty decent political backdrop/Sci-fi combo.
Ron Silver is a great Bad Guy here as McComb.He gets to shoot, beat people up,Snarls And looks frankly maniacal at times.Mia Sara is engaging and looks beautiful as ever.Bruce McGill has some funny bits as Van Dammes Boss.The very sexy Gloria Ruben also shows up as Walkers new partner.
Timecop is not the greatest when it comes to plot-holes.But unlike the recent version of HG Wells Time machine, it is a very fun movie.And one of Van Dammes best.
- argentobuff
- Jan 19, 2006
- Permalink
- MackMonMay87
- Jan 2, 2021
- Permalink
In 1994, a bespectacled dude proposes the creation of a covert time travel agency to a committee of senators. He explains the complexities of time travel in a way you have likely never considered. "It turns out if you go back in time and you change something, it's serious! It's like throwing a stone in the water, causing ripples. Only the ripples are in time." Is your mind blown yet? The senator's response, "How much is this gonna cost? The economy is bad right now." Ten years later, we're in the ultra-futuristic era of 2004, where we have smart cars, a prominent "white supremacy party" and the automated voices on answering machines are more sultry and sexy than ever. But not as sexy as Van Damme flexing his ass cheeks on a kitchen counter while he evades a super high-tech tazer gun. Van Damme plays Walker Time Ranger, a mulletman with a broken heart who is tasked with going after self-proclaimed "Harvard visionary" villain McComb. McComb is a time bandit with a penchant for talking to himself. If you haven't seen the movie yet, you won't realize that's a joke. Things go bang, things go boom and a bad guy's arm gets shattered a la T-1000 in Terminator 2. Walker's in a fight against time. And if there's anyone who can kick a clock's ass, you can bet it's Van Damme.