IMDb RATING
4.7/10
4.4K
YOUR RATING
When he double-crosses a drug kingpin, Darkman must free himself of his remote-control clutches.When he double-crosses a drug kingpin, Darkman must free himself of his remote-control clutches.When he double-crosses a drug kingpin, Darkman must free himself of his remote-control clutches.
Roxann Dawson
- Angela Rooker
- (as Roxann Biggs-Dawson)
Joel Bissonnette
- Mayo
- (as Joel Bissonette)
Christopher Bondy
- Gibson
- (as Chris Bondy)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaFilmed simultaneously with Darkman II: The Return of Durant (1995) between November 15, 1993 and December 20, 1993, but not released until going direct-to-video on August 20, 1996.
- GoofsIn Darkman II, Peyton learns how to extend the 'life' of the synthetic skin from 99 minutes to over 150 minutes. This technology, while apparently so simple Peyton is surprised he never thought of it in the previous film, is never seen again.
- Quotes
Johnny Lee: I don't get it, Rooker. Your organization handles coke, weed, crank. But you - you show up to supervise a two-bit shipment of steroids.
Peter Rooker: I'm not into drugs.
Johnny Lee: [chuckling] What the fuck do you call this shit?
Peter Rooker: Strength.
- ConnectionsEdited from Darkman (1990)
Featured review
Dr Peyton Westlake continues to live in the City's sewer system, hiding his disfigured face and working on his synthetic skin. When he steals money from a criminal gang to buy more medical equipment he draws the attention of Peter Rooker. Rooker uses Dr Thorne to get to Westlake and work out how he has become so strong. With Rooker planning to create a small army of `Darkmen' Westlake must learn to trust again to overcome Rooker's plan.
Despite the fact that this was another direct to video sequel and that it was shot at the same time as Darkman 2, it is actually quite good. In terms of the basic story it could have been better (creating super strong street thugs) but really there is plenty in the plot to enjoy. Westlake posing as Rooker and finding joy in Rooker's family life etc brings more humanity to the film than was done in part 2. Obviously the plot does has weaknesses it's very short for one, it's quite clichéd for another, although there are nice touched around Rooker.
The use of OTT visuals and nightmare vision scenes is retained and very like Rami's style in fact some of the shot almost mirror the first film. While Westlake lacks some of the craziness that he had in the first film he is still a tortured soul it's just a shame that this is mixed with the image of him as a sort of Batman figure.
Vosloo (best know as the Mummy) isn't as good as Neeson and sounds like he's reading some of his voice over lines. However he still does OK, but it's pertinent that he takes second billing behind Fahey. It's not Vosloo's fault that his character has become an ill-conceived Batman type. Fahey may well be playing an one-dimensional character but he does it well. He's not a great actor but he can hold his own in TVM's and video movies! The rest of the cast are OK but suffice to say you're never in any doubt that this never saw the inside of many cinemas.
Overall it's not brilliant but it's actually quite good certainly better than the second. Basically you know what know what you're getting and it doesn't let you down. Also it's got a really cool title .'Die Darkman, Die' B-movie homage or what!
Despite the fact that this was another direct to video sequel and that it was shot at the same time as Darkman 2, it is actually quite good. In terms of the basic story it could have been better (creating super strong street thugs) but really there is plenty in the plot to enjoy. Westlake posing as Rooker and finding joy in Rooker's family life etc brings more humanity to the film than was done in part 2. Obviously the plot does has weaknesses it's very short for one, it's quite clichéd for another, although there are nice touched around Rooker.
The use of OTT visuals and nightmare vision scenes is retained and very like Rami's style in fact some of the shot almost mirror the first film. While Westlake lacks some of the craziness that he had in the first film he is still a tortured soul it's just a shame that this is mixed with the image of him as a sort of Batman figure.
Vosloo (best know as the Mummy) isn't as good as Neeson and sounds like he's reading some of his voice over lines. However he still does OK, but it's pertinent that he takes second billing behind Fahey. It's not Vosloo's fault that his character has become an ill-conceived Batman type. Fahey may well be playing an one-dimensional character but he does it well. He's not a great actor but he can hold his own in TVM's and video movies! The rest of the cast are OK but suffice to say you're never in any doubt that this never saw the inside of many cinemas.
Overall it's not brilliant but it's actually quite good certainly better than the second. Basically you know what know what you're getting and it doesn't let you down. Also it's got a really cool title .'Die Darkman, Die' B-movie homage or what!
- bob the moo
- Jun 26, 2002
- Permalink
Details
- Runtime1 hour 27 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content