5 reviews
I have always been a fan of the French 60s and 70s comedies, they clearly show the fact that loads of explicit violence and foul language are not necessary to make a movie "funny".
In my opinion, the adventures of the Seventh Company definitely belong to the best comedy films ever made, they are exactly that kind of movies that always cheers you up when you feel unhappy. I really cannot understand why the rating of this trilogy is so low, for the adventures of Chaudard, Pithivier and Tassin are witty, somewhat silly (and comedies should be somewhat silly, when you want to watch a dark piece - and to be honest, the comedies of nowadays are either dark pieces, or indecent trash films - you can always go and watch for example the Silence of the Lambs, or the Godfather - the great films of another, kind of "darkish" kind) and most enjoyable.
I have to emphasize the performances of Pierre Mondy, Jean Lefebvre and Henri Guybet (Aldo Maccione made a great Tassin (in the first part of trilogy) as well), have you ever seen any actors who were so natural when playing their parts? You can easily believe these actors were their characters!!!
It's a real must-see, a true gem among the comedies!
In my opinion, the adventures of the Seventh Company definitely belong to the best comedy films ever made, they are exactly that kind of movies that always cheers you up when you feel unhappy. I really cannot understand why the rating of this trilogy is so low, for the adventures of Chaudard, Pithivier and Tassin are witty, somewhat silly (and comedies should be somewhat silly, when you want to watch a dark piece - and to be honest, the comedies of nowadays are either dark pieces, or indecent trash films - you can always go and watch for example the Silence of the Lambs, or the Godfather - the great films of another, kind of "darkish" kind) and most enjoyable.
I have to emphasize the performances of Pierre Mondy, Jean Lefebvre and Henri Guybet (Aldo Maccione made a great Tassin (in the first part of trilogy) as well), have you ever seen any actors who were so natural when playing their parts? You can easily believe these actors were their characters!!!
It's a real must-see, a true gem among the comedies!
- dagmar-nedbalova
- Sep 21, 2006
- Permalink
How could i describe such a great film that brings Mr. Kubrick (Paths of Glory), and Mr. Mallick (The Thin Red Line) to the rank of lame amateurs. A photography belonging to the great French school of the 70s, with influence of Alain Resnais but also Gérard Oury (in his best days), a breathless casting which has nothing to envy to D-Day all along with much deeper of human splendour. We do not understand why Pierre Mondy has not been given an Oscar for his heartbreaking performance in the acting of the indian swimming. Unforgettable! An absolute must see!!
- seb-ciné
- May 28, 1999
- Permalink
French film 'The Seventh Company Outdoors' is the last film of the seventh company series.This series was launched in 1973 with the making of "Mais Où Est Donc Passée La Septième Compagnie ?".As far as this film is concerned,one might receive mixed reactions from viewers.On the one hand there might be viewers who like this film for bringing the action from the forests into the personal lives of the ordinary people.One cannot ignore the fact that the threat level present in the film is genuine as the story takes place in the times of war.On the other hand there might also be viewers who are ready to view this film as a simple, intellectual exercise in narrating an entertaining tale of three French soldiers who get separated from their army.There are moments in this film where it becomes a complete family affair.For example : There is a brother who is not liked by his sister's husband.Actor Gérard Jugnot is perfect in his role as a French man who makes secret arrangements to hide a resistance fighter. Finally,more than a military film,'The Seventh Company outdoors" is an adventure film where Germans continue to be depicted as idiots.
- FilmCriticLalitRao
- Apr 5, 2015
- Permalink
The first movie was about the World War Two from the front lines, the second one was from the point of view of the prisoner of war. By the time you get to this movie, which is about the war on the civilian side, the whole leitmotiv of these movies becomes apparent. Although you don't need to have seen the previous ones, it is a complete and ultimate deconstruction of the narrative of World War Two in France, all neatly packaged into slapstick comedy. It is the seriousness and heft of history under the guise of goofs and gaffs. It is brilliant, it is amazing and I don't know if there has ever been anything like this.
Not only from the standpoint of a clever war film buried in the farcical comedy, but also from the scope of a series that looks at the same period from subsequent points of view and uses it to deconstruct it critically.
This film though, is the simplest in terms of story, structure and plot, but also the most effective. The overarching theme is, of course, civilian life under occupation and the Resistance. But, it is also a film that centers on domesticity and provincial life. The previous films in the series were also somewhat disengaged from the big war setpieces and the decisive military moments. It made a point of focusing on random episodes of the Battle of France and not into specific events. It was about war and not warfare. They also had many vignettes and various stereotypes that exemplified the life in French society during the first days of the conflict. This film follows into featuring events that are remote, seemingly almost random. Yet, it allows the story to present these cases of quiet heroism and deep personal sacrifice that many people experienced during that war. It's about war but not about soldiers.
Of course, our three protagonist always stumble into heroics by accident, (and frankly that is great) but there is something about self-sacrifice and resilience that courses throughout the film. The missus, the forest guide or even the collaborationist; most of the characters give up on comfort or security for a cause or an ideal. The notable exception would be the handsome Resistance officer, but that is a fun figure to provide a contrast to our heroes.
The film's true innovation, with respect to the previous ones, is the figure of Lambert, who is a Gestapo French collaborationist and the first antagonist we see in these series. Except for minor German officers, these movies never really gave a face to the occupants and bad guys were always faceless and anonymous. Lambert is such a great character, because of the performance of Pousse that makes him magnificently evil but also because it distils in simple terms the arguments of historian Robert Paxton. Who argues that the Vichy regime wasn't a shield against German brutality, as its defenders would claim, but instead it helped the Nazis going much further in their genocide and oppression than they would without it, and showed a lot of zeal in being pro-Nazi. Of course Lambert gets his comeuppance in a deliciously Guignol way at the end.
This film is the cherry on top of a series of movies that pretend they are stupid, but are actually astutely smart. It a series of light-hearted comedies that shine a light on diverse and varied aspects of life during wartime. They are damn good war movies, but also loads of fun.
Not only from the standpoint of a clever war film buried in the farcical comedy, but also from the scope of a series that looks at the same period from subsequent points of view and uses it to deconstruct it critically.
This film though, is the simplest in terms of story, structure and plot, but also the most effective. The overarching theme is, of course, civilian life under occupation and the Resistance. But, it is also a film that centers on domesticity and provincial life. The previous films in the series were also somewhat disengaged from the big war setpieces and the decisive military moments. It made a point of focusing on random episodes of the Battle of France and not into specific events. It was about war and not warfare. They also had many vignettes and various stereotypes that exemplified the life in French society during the first days of the conflict. This film follows into featuring events that are remote, seemingly almost random. Yet, it allows the story to present these cases of quiet heroism and deep personal sacrifice that many people experienced during that war. It's about war but not about soldiers.
Of course, our three protagonist always stumble into heroics by accident, (and frankly that is great) but there is something about self-sacrifice and resilience that courses throughout the film. The missus, the forest guide or even the collaborationist; most of the characters give up on comfort or security for a cause or an ideal. The notable exception would be the handsome Resistance officer, but that is a fun figure to provide a contrast to our heroes.
The film's true innovation, with respect to the previous ones, is the figure of Lambert, who is a Gestapo French collaborationist and the first antagonist we see in these series. Except for minor German officers, these movies never really gave a face to the occupants and bad guys were always faceless and anonymous. Lambert is such a great character, because of the performance of Pousse that makes him magnificently evil but also because it distils in simple terms the arguments of historian Robert Paxton. Who argues that the Vichy regime wasn't a shield against German brutality, as its defenders would claim, but instead it helped the Nazis going much further in their genocide and oppression than they would without it, and showed a lot of zeal in being pro-Nazi. Of course Lambert gets his comeuppance in a deliciously Guignol way at the end.
This film is the cherry on top of a series of movies that pretend they are stupid, but are actually astutely smart. It a series of light-hearted comedies that shine a light on diverse and varied aspects of life during wartime. They are damn good war movies, but also loads of fun.
- Criticalstaff
- Jun 2, 2021
- Permalink
One of the utmost exciting cinematographic experiences one can have, regarding the use of editing and the one of music, that challenge Kubrick. It also benefits from the breakthrough created by Resnais with "l'année dernière à Marienbad" and "je t'aime je t'aime", all along with the lessons of Godard's work. Definitely pure genius.