User reviews

In terms of follow ups to surprisingly great films that should never have had a sequel, Beneath the Planet of the Apes is almost the exact kind of movie that it should have been to come after Planet of the Apes. It expands the world of the film in a new and interesting direction, continues the feeling of weirdness that helped the original, and even moves the thematic ideas of the original into even darker directions. However, to even get to that the movie repeats the original, almost beat for beat, in its first half, introducing a new, not terribly necessary, protagonist, and spends so little time actually establishing the conflict that defines the second half that it all feels like wasted potential more than anything else.

The problems originated from the fact that Charlton Heston gave a flat refusal to starring in the sequel, eventually being talked into working on the film for two weeks total as long as his character of Taylor died. So, the writer and director decided that the best way forward was to give us a new astronaut, Brent, who had followed Taylor into deep space and ended up in the same place at the same time. That means that all of the revelations about the planet need to happen again to a character who's a full movie behind the audience. He finds Nova, follows her to Ape City where he discovers the upside down nature of the place, meets Zira and Cornelius for reasons, and then escapes again. At the movie's halfway point, he ends up in an abandoned New York City subway station and has his revelation in much smaller and less visually impressive environs than Taylor got at the end of the previous film.

Along with this action is some really ill-defined brewing conflict between the apes led by Dr. Zaius and General Ursus, a gorilla, and the Forbidden Zone. There's a line of dialogue about how scouts had gone missing which seems to be the sole motivation for taking an entire army into the Forbidden Zone, and it's thin stuff. The thing is that Dr. Zaius spoke in ways, at the end of the first movie, that seemed to indicate that the ruling class of the ape society knew a lot more about history and the Forbidden Zone than they told everyone else. It would have been easy enough to make the connection that Zaius knew of the mutant humans under the ruins of New York City, but not in any great detail, and assumed that Taylor was part of them, creating the argument that the mutants were expanding into ape territory, providing the impetus for the entire action. As it is, we spend so little time with them and so much time with Brent discovering what the audience already knows, that it all ends up as thin as possible.

The movie doesn't even really feel like a sequel until the second half once Brent and Nova go deeper into New York City through the subway. It feels like that's the actual beginning of the movie, and it should have been Taylor going in instead of this new character Brent. And the second half of the film has a bunch of stuff that I love. The mutants who worship an atomic bomb? Yes, please. I love that. They're wearing masks that look like real skin to hide their mutated selves beneath? It doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but I love it. The religious ritual that's held in the remnants of St. Patrick's Cathedral and uses Catholic prayers with bomb and fallout replacing any mention of God? I love it even more. It's the exact kind of twisted stuff that 60s and 70s science fiction excelled at. Another thing that that era of science fiction loved was nihilism (which made Star Trek stand out because it was hopeful in a sea of nihilistic science fiction), and the movie ending with Taylor blowing up the world because screw it, it all sucks, is something I love.

Not everything in the second half is great, though. The use of Brent requires a late introduction to Taylor that feels out of place. There's a fight scene that doesn't really work for me. And, most important of all, the conflict between ape and mutant was so thinly established that when the gorilla army shows up and attacks, it feels really empty. There are some surprisingly great visuals here like when the gorilla army is marching into St. Patrick's with the sole remaining mutant standing before the golden doomsday bomb, but they're empty because, again, the conflict itself is empty.

And, to top it off, I think that the inclusion of Brent wasn't just unnecessary from a storytelling perspective, but it was unnecessary from a production perspective as well. Some judicious use of body doubles and scheduling could have gotten Charlton Heston to carry his part of the movie completely in just a couple weeks of filming. The thing is that the ape society stuff needed to stand on its own without a human involved, having Taylor get lost in the mutant city early, spending time with Dr. Zaius to convincingly build the conflict with the mutants in the Forbidden Zone, and then leaning into the conflict as a continuation of the damnation of humanity that is the first film. I think it could have worked really quite well if there wasn't a need to remake the film unnecessarily in the first half.

Oh well, it's a mixed bad, but it definitely has stuff that works. Unfortunately, that stuff is outnumbered by the more mediocre material that supports it. It's far from one of the worst sequels to a great film ever made. It has too many interesting ideas and visuals to dismiss it completely, but it could have been better.

Beneath was the best Planet of the Apes film bar none. Everything was bigger and better this time around: bigger sets, more gorillas, the whole of New York instead of a mere Statue of Liberty, and, best of all, faceless, telepathic mutants than can kill with the mind. Yes, I was once ten years old.

Watched again with many years of hindsight, it's clear that, while entertaining, Beneath was produced without anything approaching artistry. The ultimate in sequels, it tries to tell the same story twice as big, but with only half the success. Until Battle came along and picked the flesh off Apes' rotting carcass this was the worst sequel because it did nothing new with the format. Even the working title - Planet of the Apes Revisited - betrays the lack of thought and the desire for finance that went into this one.

A virtually identical plotline rattles along at a fair pace, meaning all subtlety is jettisoned. The allegories are also confused by not really being allegories at all. Look at the metaphor for anti-war protestors by casting chimps as ... er, anti-war protestors. A look at how man often judges another man on the colour of his skin is alluded to ... er, by having an ape judging a man on the colour of his skin. (On this note, perversely for a film that purports liberal satire, the only one of the mutants to demonstrate real cruelty was Don Pedro Colley, the sole black character in the film. And despite its worthiness, I don't think I've ever seen another film where a man's credit is given as "Negro"). However, I did have to smile at the chimp that punningly complains about "gorilla brutality".

The decreased budget (a sensible studio idea to cut the finance of the sequels to a hit movie) shows with some of the ape extras having decidedly ropy masks in the crowd scenes. The opening of the picture also recaps the first, cannily highlighting the glaring difference between Roddy McDowall's and David Watson's performances as Cornelius. Watson, standing in for an absent McDowall, does reasonably well but really doesn't look anything like him, even under latex. Note too how all the ape masks give the actors lisps, something I never noticed before. Never mind apes, anyone would think James Franciscus had landed on the planet of the Pertwees. There's also some abysmal back projection work when Franciscus is wrestling on top of the horsedrawn carriage. The mutants are pretty good, though their prayers to "The Holy Fallout" are a little silly. Why do they wear human masks anyway? Where do they make them? I dunno, I don't make the rules up, do I?

Of course, the main problem is the pointless game of one-upmanship it plays with its source. There's no longer any element of surprise that this is Earth, so the ruined monuments, nice as they are, no longer have any great effect. It misses the point, also: the Statue of Liberty is not just a relic, but a symbol. New York Subway is just where people caught trains. And as impressive as the effects are, if not directed well – which they aren't, particularly – then it becomes fatuous.

It's weird how all four sequels were made within a year of each other, yet at least two of them tried something new. Beneath came two years after the original yet has a rehashed "in it for the money" feel all the way through, right down to its abrupt, slightly unsatisfactory climax. Yet despite the many, many faults I've levelled at it, Beneath the Planet of the Apes is still a very enjoyable film. Not in the sense of the first, which genuinely had something to say, but in the guise of pulp SF then this sequel is well worth seeing. In fact, despite the slating I've given it, I still awarded it 6/10.

"Beneath" is a film that epitomizes the best and worst that a sequel to a masterpiece, as "Planet Of The Apes" was, could be. For me, it is the most watchable of the sequels only because it's the only one that stays in the familiar territory established by the first film. But oh that ending....

I really can not understand why the heck Richard Zanuck allowed Charlton Heston to talk him into going with that downer ending that has already been referred to by others. The only reason why Heston pushed it wasn't because it made for good cinema but because he wanted to singlehandedly see to it that he never have to do another Apes sequel again. It's a pity that Heston never realized that the best sequel story one could have explored was what happened to Taylor and Nova afterwards, and could have made for some equally compelling drama as the first film did. To me, the main appeal of the first film wasn't the Ape society, it was the character of Taylor and his fascinating odyssey from misanthrope to defender of the species, only to see his earlier feelings borne out in the shock ending. The question that should have been addressed next in a sequel was, what would Taylor do now that he realized he was on Earth? What other things were there to discover on the planet? (Heck, you could have easily made a sequel movie without the apes returning, as far as I'm concerned!) Alas, because of the plot device imposed by this film (and Heston's inability to realize what a good thing he might have had going for himself), the rest of the series had to veer off into what was for me, a more uninteresting story line focusing on the Apes and their inevitable rise to power.

Plot holes and depressing ending notwithstanding, "Beneath" is still worth watching to see the traces of what could have been a great film that are there. The mutant storyline and their dwellings underneath the remains of New York still has an irresistible viewing quality to it. I do not recommend watching it in tandem with its magnificent predecessor though, because that's only going to make you more angry about the ending of this film.

After a ship crash lands on the planet Earth, Brent (James Franciscus) is the sole survivor of a mission to rescue Taylor (Charlton Heston) and his crew. Brent eventually comes across Nova (Linda Harrison), Taylor's companion who is wearing his dog tags and leads Brent to the ape city where they find help from Taylor's chimpanzee allies Zira (Kim Hunter) and Cornelius (David Watson). As Nova and Taylor attempt to venture into the Forbidden Zone intent on finding Taylor, General Ursus (James Gergory) and his legion of Gorilla soldiers are ramping up for a military invasion into the Forbidden Zone as Dr. Zaius (Maurice Evans) and the citizen's council attempt to maintain order.

After the success of Planet of the Apes, 20th Century Fox became interested in making a sequel. After original film's co-writing Rod Serling proved unavailable to deliver a treatment in time for when Fox wanted it, and a concept called Planet of the Men by author of the original Planet of the Apes source novel Pierre Boulle was rejected, producer Mort Abrahams came up with the story elements that would become Beneath the Planet of the Apes and entrusted screenwriting duties to Paul Dehn who at the time was best known for Goldfinger and The Spy Who Came in from the Cold. While the film enjoyed healthy box office (though not matching the longevity of its predecessor) critical reception tended to skew negative with many lamenting the focus on large scale action over the atmosphere and social commentary of the original. While elements of Beneath the Planet of the Apes have worked their way into popular consciousness (regular viewers of Futurama will notice one or two references), the film just doesn't have the novelty or ideas needed to match its predecessor.

While Beneath the Planet of the Apes features a larger number of apes on display at any given point with a major selling point being the Gorilla army, the story begins to crumble following the abridged recap of the original's iconic ending. While James Franciscus had been a staple of TV with Beneath the Planet of the Apes his "big break", Franciscus' character is such a hollow placeholder for Taylor that there's nothing about him aside from serving as an audience proxy (for information we're already aware of). While I may have had my issues with Heston's over the top performance in parts of the original, at least he had a fully developed character as a misanthropic cynic with an acerbic sense of humor that made him compelling. I'll admit I'm not all that familiar with Franciscus' body of work so I can speak to his abilities as an actor, but I just never resonated with Brent in any way. Structurally speaking the first 45 minutes is basically a mini-remake of the first film with Brent going through a heavily abridged arc of everything Taylor went through (including discovering it was Earth along which has a "so what?" feeling to it.). Once we do get something new with traversing into the Forbidden Zone and actually going "beneath" as the title promised us we do get some new elements but they're not all that interesting or developed. While there are attempts at doing social commentary in the vein of the original film, most of it either feels like half-hearted lip service or "been there, done that" with the most prominent placement being a scene where protesting chimpanzees (the society's intellectuals) are rousted by the more thuggish and war hungry gorillas. There's certainly plenty of action on display in Beneath the Planet of the Apes, but there's so little structure or stakes to the plot that you end up not really caring all the way up to a bleak ending the movie really doesn't earn.

Beneath the Planet of the Apes has everything that made the 1968 film a classic, only without the structure, intrigue or humor as it instead opts more for showing off a greater number of apes on screen and neglecting to make them interesting in favor of more battle sequences. While the second half almost has some inspired moments, it ultimately never delivers a satisfying experience.

So poorly done with no respect to the legacy of the original film. Obvious signs of budget cuts everywhere, especially with the ape makeup. Generally in every scene, outside of a handful of apes in the front of the cameras, most apes were done up with cheap ill-fitting rubber masks, poorly constructed costumes etc. To put in bluntly, it was a poorly made film with a very poor budget. Don't waste your time on this one.

The original was fun and thrilling to watch but they messed up with this second installment.

The story of the first half was the same as the original's and the second half was a mere continuation of the original, the screenplay was average, the direction was average and the performances were bad. It was a good idea to explore the underground ruins of once a city and they could have explored more on how all this happened but the makers went with what you can call nonsense. The underground society shown was also so bad and unnecessary that you start losing your will to watch the movie after a certain point of time.

Overall, it was an underwhelming sequel which could have been a great one if the writers would have worked more efficiently.

Beneath the planet of the apes is a continuation of the first.Astronaut Brent is sent on a rescue mission to find Taylor and his whereabouts.Brent ends up on the same strange planet that Taylor did and is captured by the apes and suffers the same faith as Taylor did only in a shorter version.Brent also discovers a mysterious under ground place where mutants worship an atomic bomb as their god.Little does Brent know the ape army is trying to track him down and kill him.Brent gets reunited with Taylor but the ape the ape army are getting closer and time is running out.

Some bad acting and stupid parts of this film made me give it a 6 rating.This is a classic but to me its losing some of its magic.Recommended to Planet of the Apes fans,sci-fi fans and people who finds Planet of the Apes interesting.This is enjoyable to some but not all.I hope the next sequels are as good as this.

It took two years for the sequel to Planet Of The Apes to get to the big screen, henceforth 20th Century Fox would space them out about a year at a time. Beneath The Planet Of The Apes seems to have been inspired a lot by Dr. Strangelove played far less tongue in cheek by the cast.

Kim Hunter, Maurice Evans, Linda Harrison, and Charlton Heston return for this first sequel. And James Franciscus is the only survivor of a rescue ship sent after Heston and his crew. Of course he finds the same simian civilization that Heston found and with the same problems and friends among the apes.

Franciscus goes into the forbidden zone that Heston entered, but now the apes have a military chieftain who wants to enter and conquer the previous forbidden zone. He's played by a thuggish James Gregory.

Maurice Evans is the scientist who has a vested interest in keeping the ape orthodox traditions inviolate. He doesn't want to go into the forbidden zone where Heston and Franciscus have gone, but the force of public opinion is working against him. He tags along with Gregory's military expedition to watch out for their culture.

Of course there are humans there and of a higher order than the simple creatures who were thought to be below the simian on this planet. What happens when they encounter those humans is for you to see the film for.

No doubt the force of public opinion influenced 20th Century Fox to make this sequel. Today's sequels to popular films are the result of certain teaser questions put into the plots of the originals. That was not done back then clearly because of some rather clumsy writing in Beneath The Planet Of The Apes. And certainly the ending here did not anticipate yet another sequel.

Despite that though a lot of good social commentary about the world and America got into this film, maybe even more than in the original Planet Of The Apes. Nobody could mistake the protests of the young chimpanzees to the military expedition for anything else, but criticizing the war in Vietnam and Nixon's incursion into China.

As in the first film my favorite is foxy Maurice Evans, protector of the orthodox ape religion and culture. Fans of the series will be pleased with him and the film.

This first sequel to the '68 science fiction hit has all the markings of something rushed into production. There was no time to craft a story which explores the truly interesting possibilities of astronaut Taylor's continuing odyssey on a future world turned upside down. The story could have and should have concentrated on the evolving struggle between the ruling class of apes and the backward humans. Instead, the filmmakers created a new threat for this film, a secret society of human mutants living underground. They show up in the 2nd half of this feature and, in prolonged scenes, show off their telepathic powers in torturing the heroes. The heroes, in this case, are another astronaut (Franciscus) who followed Taylor's trajectory to this other planet and Taylor himself (Heston, reprising his role briefly). Wow, what an original concept - another astronaut, who, in an accelerated version of the first film's events, also finds Ape City, encounters two sympathetic chimps, gets captured and escapes. Are we watching some kind of a repeat?

The quick pace of this picture is probably its best aspect; this stresses action. However, the pace is so fast that some crucial points in geography are sacrificed: getting to the Forbidden Zone from Ape City is just a short walk in a tunnel for some, while others have to trudge for days overhead. In a slight nod to the satirical aspects of the original film, we do get to see religion being mocked (the original satirized the social & political anchors of a community). But, it's not a very subtle jab. The mutants profess to be more intelligent than either the heroes or the apes, which they seem to prove with their advanced mind powers, but they spend most of their time worshiping a nuclear bomb, chanting silly songs - they really picked a strange form of idolatry, but maybe they're simply crazed. This movie throws together a lot of science fiction concepts but the resulting brew is rather bland. It's a decent action piece, not much more.

Franciscus shows he is no Heston; he overacts in most of his scenes, as if he had no clue on how to depict a man realizing where he's actually landed, but then again, he wasn't the skipper on this 2nd ship (the lead officer dies soon after they crash-land); we're not watching a leader but a follower try to carry the picture. I was struck by how Heston towered over him in their brutal fight scene. McDowall is also missing; his role of Cornelius is played by actor Watson. Evans & Gregory are pretty good as the ape leaders but whoever stuck them in ape suits for the sauna scene should have thought about it a few more minutes. This movie ends everything on a grotesquely conclusive note, but they managed to find a way to continue the story in "Escape From the Planet of the Apes."

Very high quality sequel to the original. No, it was not quite as good as the original but the performances and the story were both strong. Just watched it on DVD and forgot about how creepy the underground mutant people were. Especially when they were chanting to their "god". James Franciscus gave a very good performance and Linda Harrison is simply HOT! The ending was a little too abrupt but the movie is well worth seeing and owning on DVD.

Quite a far way off its predecessor, even if 'Beneath the Planet of the Apes' is still a good film.

Charlton Heston reportedly wasn't initially interested in returning for a sequel, though, to his credit, did in the end return briefly to tie up his character's loose end - and apparently even gave his fee to charity. That's why we don't see much of him here, which is a shame but given the aforementioned it came out well enough.

James Franciscus takes over from Heston and does a fine job, the latter is definitely the better of the two but Franciscus is passable. Kim Hunter, Maurice Evans and Linda Harrison do return, though the first two basically play second fiddle to others - including newcomer James Gregory's bunch of characters; Gregory is solid, fwiw. As for the film's other parts, make-up etc., it's basically the same as the original. The plot even feels similar for a fair chunk of this production, though it eventually goes its own way.

I'm even more interested to check out the subsequent sequels, given the ending to this 1970 film was apparently intended - by those on the ground, so to speak - to be the final entry; the studio evidently wasn't in agreement.

I honestly prefer the original series of The Planet of the Apes. The 1970s films are more my aesthetic preference and seem more coherent in terms of message. But this one is pretty, pretty bad.

Beneath the Planet of the Apes is fun to watch for the first half, there are recurring characters and an expansion of the story. But the whole nuclear atom bomb sub-plot is the kind of garbage better left in a black-and-white monster movie from the 1950s clearly written by someone utterly scientifically illiterate. How are the humans thriving underground without sun and fresh air, first of all? This and other questions will ultimately be met with a resounding "I do not care" once you watch The Coneheads mentally will two arrogant white dudes to kill each other.

This film is a direct follow on from the original as we follow the journey on horseback by Charlton Heston (Taylor) and Linda Harrison (Nova). At the same time, astronaut James Franciscus (Brent) and his captain crash land on the Planet of the Apes, also in the Forbidden Zone. Only Franciscus survives to explore the territory and meets up with the solitary Harrison. They ride together as we see flashback memories from Harrison as to the fate of Heston and Franciscus discovers where he has landed and sees the local residents. This duo are captured but eventually discover another society living beneath the Planet of the Apes.

I like how this film follows on directly from the original but it doesn't make sense for Franciscus to be part of a search party looking for Heston. I assumed he was part of a fleet that set off at the same time as Heston. That's the way it would make sense. In this film the gorillas take charge from the orangutans (or however you spell it) and force a military campaign. The chimpanzees, who were the intelligent group of doctors and scientists in the original, have now been down-graded to student-type time-wasters who carry out sit-down protests. That was obviously meant to mirror the anti-Vietnam war protests going on in real life at the time, but I found it a crass touch to be put into this movie.

However, the ending, once again, makes you think. Whilst the original film left you wondering about the origins and timeline of mankind, this film guides you specifically to what our destiny is. It has a very strong impact, especially in these times with lunatic leaders like Putin and Little Rocket Man from North Korea in possession of nuclear missiles, and other societies like Pakistan on the verge of developing them for themselves. I'm afraid the outcome for the human race is inevitable as, in time, it just takes one maniac to take everyone out. I just hope it is not during my lifetime.

I watched this film and then realized there is no point in denying yourself things that you like or that you may never get the opportunity to experience again. So, I immediately ordered a Chinese take-away as I like the crunchy water chestnuts that you get. It could be my last!

This was horrible. Totally drained of any intelligence, any creativity, and certainly any originality. Everything that was good and admirable about The Planet of the Apes was missing in Beneath the Planet of the Apes. It was replaced with cheap special effects, inexplicable sci-fi, and a race of subterranean quasi-religious humans that seemed to have no real purpose.

I couldn't finish watching. I gave the movie an hour to correct itself and explain its new direction. It could not and did not, so I moved on.