31 reviews
Thank goodness for TCM, because every once in a while we catch a forgotten gem not yet available on DVD, and this is one of those. Sure it's a somewhat lightweight film, but it has its heavy moments, and sometimes you don't feel like watching "War and Peace," you just want something entertaining and substantive enough to keep you watching. I thoroughly enjoyed this.
The setting in 1848 New York was interesting. I like stories with time periods and settings not usually thought of. When you mention the 1800s most Americans are thinking cowboys and Indians and the Old West, or else the Civil War. Yet there were whole regions and eras in our country's history not usually covered that surely are brimming with stories.
Some have criticized the movie for its stilted dialog, but hey, that's the way upper crust people talked back then. Just try reading a book written in 1848 by a more cultured author, and you'll see what I mean. I found it interesting to listen to. The cast was great, too. I have never thought of Joseph Cotten as a particularly handsome actor, but that mustache made him look rather dashing! He should have worn it more often. And then there's Jim Backus... Ususally stereotyped as Mr. Magoo or Thurston Howell III, here he showed us his depth as an actor by making the serious character of Flaherty seem so real and natural.
There's a murder in this mystery, but it's not at all what you would think. There are several plot twists that. while not spectacular, are still suspenseful and entertaining. You may or may not be caught by surprise by the revelation at the end, but many viewers will be. I highly recommend this film and hope it is soon available on DVD.
The setting in 1848 New York was interesting. I like stories with time periods and settings not usually thought of. When you mention the 1800s most Americans are thinking cowboys and Indians and the Old West, or else the Civil War. Yet there were whole regions and eras in our country's history not usually covered that surely are brimming with stories.
Some have criticized the movie for its stilted dialog, but hey, that's the way upper crust people talked back then. Just try reading a book written in 1848 by a more cultured author, and you'll see what I mean. I found it interesting to listen to. The cast was great, too. I have never thought of Joseph Cotten as a particularly handsome actor, but that mustache made him look rather dashing! He should have worn it more often. And then there's Jim Backus... Ususally stereotyped as Mr. Magoo or Thurston Howell III, here he showed us his depth as an actor by making the serious character of Flaherty seem so real and natural.
There's a murder in this mystery, but it's not at all what you would think. There are several plot twists that. while not spectacular, are still suspenseful and entertaining. You may or may not be caught by surprise by the revelation at the end, but many viewers will be. I highly recommend this film and hope it is soon available on DVD.
- randwolfray
- Jul 15, 2010
- Permalink
In 1848 New York, a beautiful but naïve French girl arrives by ship seeking out her fiancée's grandfather in hopes of securing funds for the young man's political cause back in Europe; instead, she finds the elderly millionaire under constant danger of being murdered by his mercenary household staff--with only a mysterious wine-lover (and unemployed town poet) able to assist her. Screenwriter Frank Fenton, working from a story by John Dickson Carr, sets up the pieces within this gas-lit milieu very carefully, and his witty, theatrical dialogue is often a hoot. Newcomer Leslie Caron, in only her second Hollywood picture, works her tender vulnerability to good effect in a tailor-made role, though predictably it is Barbara Stanwyck as the household's 'mistress' who steals most of the thunder (she's a formidable foe--with a smirk of stone and bedroom eyes to boot!). Joseph Cotten is also excellent as the man with a cloak who comes to Caron's aid, and the twist involving his character is a smashing one. Not an important movie but an engaging one, with a well-upholstered production and solid supporting players. *** from ****
- moonspinner55
- Oct 19, 2009
- Permalink
Though the mystery man is in reality no mystery man--most viewers will be able to identify the literary figure from the beginning--this movie gem now almost forgotten is well written, well acted, and well presented. It still packs a wallop, filled with thrills and suspense. Not surprisingly, the leads give outstanding performances as one would expect from the likes of Joseph Cotten, Barbara Stanwyck, Louis Calhern, and Leslie Caron. What is surprising is how well Jim Backus (Mr. Magoo) as Flaherty the good-hearted if cynical bartender shines in a small part, as does Joe De Santis, now known mainly for his TV work, playing the sinister and potentially deadly Martin, the butler. Margaret Wycherly too plays Mrs. Flynn, the pessimistic yet wily housekeeper, to perfection.
The story by detective novelist John Dickson Carr while not all that original is aided by a witty script by Frank Fenton. The plot is a rehash of the age-old ploy of a group of hangers-on after an old man's fortune, this time led by a conniving siren. What makes this one somewhat fresh is the introduction of a historical character and a pretty French guest who supplies intrigue smiting of revolutionary Europe in 1848, in the aftermath of the fall of Napoleon's empire. There is also an unexpected death to make it all the more interesting. All in all an entertaining film that deserves more recognition.
The story by detective novelist John Dickson Carr while not all that original is aided by a witty script by Frank Fenton. The plot is a rehash of the age-old ploy of a group of hangers-on after an old man's fortune, this time led by a conniving siren. What makes this one somewhat fresh is the introduction of a historical character and a pretty French guest who supplies intrigue smiting of revolutionary Europe in 1848, in the aftermath of the fall of Napoleon's empire. There is also an unexpected death to make it all the more interesting. All in all an entertaining film that deserves more recognition.
Barbara Stanwyck, running the household for wealthy French ex-patriot Louis Calhern, is waiting with the rest of the staff for the old man to die while perhaps helping to speed things up a little. Things get complicated when the grandson's fiance (Leslie Caron) shows up expressing need for the old man's money. It doesn't take long for mysterious stranger Joseph Cotten to get involved. An erudite alcoholic with no money but clearly superior breeding, he takes the young woman's side and proves to be a formidable match for the devious household.
The movie appears to be uniquely conceived as a film-noir mystery put into a Victorian time frame. The opening scenes, the plot structure, and the character conflicts all clearly fit the film-noir style, and this is further enhanced by putting Stanwyck in a familiar role as the femme fatale. Aside from an embarrassing few minutes of singing, she is as excellent as her somewhat limited role allows her to be, and the rest of the cast performs excellently as well.
Unfortunately, the story turns out to be not as much of a mystery as it could be and the film-noir stylings are greatly watered down in order to create the type of Victorian atmosphere which would meet the expectations of most of the viewers. It's an enjoyable, well-made film, but it definitely lacks the bite it might otherwise have had.
The movie appears to be uniquely conceived as a film-noir mystery put into a Victorian time frame. The opening scenes, the plot structure, and the character conflicts all clearly fit the film-noir style, and this is further enhanced by putting Stanwyck in a familiar role as the femme fatale. Aside from an embarrassing few minutes of singing, she is as excellent as her somewhat limited role allows her to be, and the rest of the cast performs excellently as well.
Unfortunately, the story turns out to be not as much of a mystery as it could be and the film-noir stylings are greatly watered down in order to create the type of Victorian atmosphere which would meet the expectations of most of the viewers. It's an enjoyable, well-made film, but it definitely lacks the bite it might otherwise have had.
A semi-historical costume drama about literature's first detective (or his author), as played by Joseph Cotton. The acting is excellent all around. Cotton is good, he doesn't try to do too much with his role, & it would have been tempting to ham it up during some drinking scenes, but he underplays his part nicely. Barbara Stanwyck is deliciously evil as she tries every imaginable trick to achieve her goal. Leslie Caron is cute & believable as a French woman in a role tailor made for her. Joe De Santis does well as the heavy. Louis Calhern overpowers each scene he's in, but that's what his character calls for. Another thing I enjoyed about this film is that it's apparently headed towards several cliches, but manages to avoid them before getting there & doesn't follow the usual expected plot pattern. It's by no means a Film Noir, but it shares some very snappy dialog with that genre, especially between Cotton & Stanwyck. If the film had a little more suspense or mystery, & it would have been a real winner. I rate it 7/10.
Joseph Cotten, Barbara Stanwyck, Louis Calhern, and Leslie Caron star in "The Man with a Cloak," a 1951 thriller set in 1848 New York. A young woman (Caron) comes to New York to get money for her boyfriend's political cause from his grandfather (Calhern). Grandpa is in the clutches of his ex-girlfriend turned housekeeper (Stanwyck) and a surly butler (Joe De Santis) who are waiting for the old man to die so they can get his money. The Caron character thinks they are trying to kill him, so she appeals to an apparent ne'er do well who hangs at the local bar, Dupin (Cotten) for help.
This is a slow-moving story for sure, but Cotten has some great dialogue nonetheless. Stanwyck looks beautiful and is very good as the duplicitous woman. Alas, these are film careers on the wane, as evidenced by the smallness of the film. Caron is quite young and appealing, and of course, her star would go up and up. The ending has a twist that is quite fun. I have no idea if it's historically preposterous or not, but this movie needed a kick and it was a good one. Certainly worth seeing for its stars.
This is a slow-moving story for sure, but Cotten has some great dialogue nonetheless. Stanwyck looks beautiful and is very good as the duplicitous woman. Alas, these are film careers on the wane, as evidenced by the smallness of the film. Caron is quite young and appealing, and of course, her star would go up and up. The ending has a twist that is quite fun. I have no idea if it's historically preposterous or not, but this movie needed a kick and it was a good one. Certainly worth seeing for its stars.
While not in the top drawer of mystery films of the era, the film should come as a pleasant surprise for those interested in the period and definitely will register with films of the noir genre. The plot is difficult to sum up quickly but rest assured that it is literary and interesting, involves at least one or two good twists and sports a fine cast of players better known for work in more famous films. Joseph Cotten is particularly fine as the man of mystery who foils an attempt to rob the inheritance related to the demise of an old reprobate (Louis Calhern) in 1840's New York. Throw in Barbara Stanwyck at her most sultry and Leslie Carone at her most innocent and you have a film that does not exactly match the excitement generated by the opening scenes but holds one's attention nonetheless.
- bob_gilmore1
- Jan 19, 2009
- Permalink
I suspect that this was thought of as a small production by MGM at the time, but it's got two of my favorites, both of whom were perhaps not quite as "big" as they had been a few years earlier: Stanwyck and Cotten (maybe the only time he was mustachioed on film?). This film has a lot going for it: wonderful score by David Raksin, the rich voices of the principals, Louis Calhern chewing up all of the period scenery, and strong black-and-white photography. It's a period thriller, but a leisurely one, with a nice sense of atmosphere. The script has some lively exchanges between characters, although the artifice shows a bit sometimes. Stanwyck's character is a little ambiguous, but that seems appropriate in a way. Always-reliable supporting players Joe DeSantis and Margaret Wycherly (the terrifying mum in "White Heat") are fine as the cohorts of Stanwyck's "Lorna Bounty"--what a great name! And there's a beautiful raven too. What more can you ask for?
- hildacrane
- Aug 13, 2005
- Permalink
A curious film hampered by an overwritten and stagy script, Man With a Cloak starts off looking like it might deserve to be as forgotten as it apparently is. However it recovers nicely when we see its plot unfold. Joseph Cotten plays Dupin, an intellectual, fond of drinking, but without a steady income, who spends much of his time in the local establishment owned by the kindly yet pragmatic Flaherty (Jim Backus). The young French woman Madeline Minot (Leslie Caron) arrives in New York from France with a letter of introduction from her fiancée, now manning the barricades in Paris, to his grandfather, the wealthy but dying Charles Therverner (Louis Calhern) who must spend his last days surrounded by the avaricious staff of the house, who impatiently await his death, in the vain hope that they will somehow get his money. Barbara Stanwick, as the head of the house, and Joe De Santis as the brutish and menacing butler, along with Margaret Wycherly as the housekeeper, have waited years for the old man to die, and are now confronted with the arrival of Madeline Minot, who is also seeking the old man's fortune although for the altruistic purpose of aiding the establishment of a republic in France. While the dialog tends towards the verbose, the story maintains your interest, especially the unlikely romance of sorts between Stanwick and De Santis, a romance based not on any mutual attraction, but on their shameless complicity in hastening along the dying process. Cotten, as Dupin, manages to come between them and in the process infuriates the butler though his anger is played with taut control by De Santis, whose performance is memorable. All in all, it is one of those films, that if you can catch it on TCM, is definitely worth watching.
- RanchoTuVu
- Jan 20, 2005
- Permalink
Man with a Cloak has an impressive roster of performers but somehow they fail to jell as a team to make for a winning film. Usually Joseph Cotton and Barbara Stanwyck shine in these dark ambiguous roles but here they fail to connect like the rest of the cast who also seem disconnected from each other. It's as if they are still in rehearsal working on their parts and oblivious to everyone else.
Wealthy Charles Tavernier (Louis Calhearn) is near death. Loyal but fed up housekeepers await the day to collect the inheritance they feel they so richly deserve. Enter Madeline Minot (Leslie Caron) from Paris who tries to persuade Tavernier to leave his money to his grandson and her fiancé. On the periphery but soon inveigling his way into the drama Dupin a mysterious poet takes up the cause of Minot as Tavernier starts to circle the drain.
Stanwyck as the plotting housekeeper gives a nice icy performance in attempting to outwit Minot and Dupin. As things begin to unravel she retains her cool pushing around fellow conspirators and undermining Tavernier's health. Cotton is miscast as the poet more in search of a drink than a sonnet. He lacks the carefree nature of a free spirit and is more smug than charming as the protagonist. Caron is a dour GiGi, Margaret Wycherly steals every scene she utters a word and Calhearn walks off with the acting honors as the withering Tavernier.
Director Fletcher Markle and cameraman George Folsey serve up a few William Wyler deep focus moments with some revealing compositions but they never build up enough steam to sustain the whole film or heighten tension before capping things off with a silly denouement that reveals to the audience they have wasted their time.
Wealthy Charles Tavernier (Louis Calhearn) is near death. Loyal but fed up housekeepers await the day to collect the inheritance they feel they so richly deserve. Enter Madeline Minot (Leslie Caron) from Paris who tries to persuade Tavernier to leave his money to his grandson and her fiancé. On the periphery but soon inveigling his way into the drama Dupin a mysterious poet takes up the cause of Minot as Tavernier starts to circle the drain.
Stanwyck as the plotting housekeeper gives a nice icy performance in attempting to outwit Minot and Dupin. As things begin to unravel she retains her cool pushing around fellow conspirators and undermining Tavernier's health. Cotton is miscast as the poet more in search of a drink than a sonnet. He lacks the carefree nature of a free spirit and is more smug than charming as the protagonist. Caron is a dour GiGi, Margaret Wycherly steals every scene she utters a word and Calhearn walks off with the acting honors as the withering Tavernier.
Director Fletcher Markle and cameraman George Folsey serve up a few William Wyler deep focus moments with some revealing compositions but they never build up enough steam to sustain the whole film or heighten tension before capping things off with a silly denouement that reveals to the audience they have wasted their time.
Saw this on Television the other day --- The writers know how to create great dialogue --- Movie has been under-rated with technical critique --- See it if you have a chance and choose for yourself. I am searching for the screen play so that I may examine the lines in greater detail. Also I am investigating how the screen writers collaborated to produce quality bit of badinage and intelligences. I went to TNT but their database doesn't have it listed so I can't buy the film from them. I want to see it again if ever it is broadcast again so I may confirm my first impression. I think, to make this comment longer, that the best comments are the most distilled comments; ones that do not show any attempt to show or claim superior knowledge. That explains why my preferences demand concise, to the point, relevant dialogue lines. I hope you will forgive me for being so wordy.
In 1848 New York, mysterious wanderer Joseph Cotten (as "Dupin") watches pretty young Leslie Caron (as Madeline Minot) arrive from Paris, France. She is looking for her lover's wealthy grandfather, Louis Calhern (as Charles Thevenet). Penniless and thirsty for wine, Mr. Cotten meets Ms. Caron and the two form a bond. Caron wants Mr. Calhern to finance the French Revolution. Caron finds Calhern is very ill, and expected to die. Moreover, she suspects actress-turned-housekeeper Barbara Stanwyck (as Lorna Bounty) and her staff may be helping the old man into his grave. Nice work from photographer George J. Folsey and the MGM crew. Clearly, director Fletcher Markle should have received more film assignments. The mystery involving Cotten's alcoholic character plays out as gimmicky and false, but "The Man with a Cloak" is worth an invitation.
****** The Man with a Cloak (11/27/51) Fletcher Markle ~ Joseph Cotten, Barbara Stanwyck, Leslie Caron, Louis Calhern
****** The Man with a Cloak (11/27/51) Fletcher Markle ~ Joseph Cotten, Barbara Stanwyck, Leslie Caron, Louis Calhern
- wes-connors
- May 29, 2012
- Permalink
Madeline (Leslie Caron) arrives in the United States to meet with a horrible old man, Mr. Tevenet (Louis Calhern). Why? Because Tevenet's grandson, a revolutionary, wants money to help him and the republican cause*. Tevenet is not in favor of the new republic and is a nasty old crank...but inexplicably likes Madeline and asks her to stay. This is a problem, as the staff in the Tevenet household was planning on taking all his money once the old man dies...and now, potentially, he'll give it to the grandson. How will they try to stop Madeline? And, how will Madeline's new acquaintance (Joseph Cotten) fit in to all this?
When "The Man With a Cloak" debuted, it lost a ton of money (several million in today's money). Does this mean the film is terrible or was it just a good film that didn't find a market? After all, with Barbara Stanwyck, Joseph Cotten and Leslie Caron, it obviously had some excellent actors in the picture.
I found this film to be extremely talky. All too often, instead of action, folks talked...and talked. Sadly, there was a great fight scene near the end...but it was too little, too late. Plus, instead of just ending there, the film went on a bit...resulting in a very good ending being not so very good. Worth watching if you are a bit fan of the actors...otherwise an easy film to skip. Or, perhaps, you might want to watch the film as there are a few clues scattered here and there about who Dupin actually is.
By the way, there is a trick or treating scene in the film. The film is set around 1940...but trick or treating didn't come into vogue until the 1920s. Oops.
When "The Man With a Cloak" debuted, it lost a ton of money (several million in today's money). Does this mean the film is terrible or was it just a good film that didn't find a market? After all, with Barbara Stanwyck, Joseph Cotten and Leslie Caron, it obviously had some excellent actors in the picture.
I found this film to be extremely talky. All too often, instead of action, folks talked...and talked. Sadly, there was a great fight scene near the end...but it was too little, too late. Plus, instead of just ending there, the film went on a bit...resulting in a very good ending being not so very good. Worth watching if you are a bit fan of the actors...otherwise an easy film to skip. Or, perhaps, you might want to watch the film as there are a few clues scattered here and there about who Dupin actually is.
By the way, there is a trick or treating scene in the film. The film is set around 1940...but trick or treating didn't come into vogue until the 1920s. Oops.
- planktonrules
- Jul 8, 2018
- Permalink
... maybe that's why she never sang in any other picture. But that's a minor point, because "The Man With A Cloak" is an absorbing, interesting 84 minutes with a surprise payoff. I hate rehashing plots, but just a couple of brushstrokes; Joseph Cotten arrives in NYC, as does Leslie Caron, he penniless and she interceding for her fiancé back in Paris (it is 1848). She is looking for her fiancé's dying grandfather (Calhern) to intercede for funds and runs into Cotten. She tells him she has come to an impasse in the form of Calhern's iron-willed housekeeper (Stanwyck). It seems none of Calhern's staff like him and hope he will die soon so they can split his fortune. Together Cotten and Caron try to outwit his staff's plans to hasten Calhern's departure.
I disagree with most of the other reviewers and I felt it was a very good story (from a book by John Dickson Carr) which keeps the viewer off balance throughout. It is held together by old pros Stanwyck and Calhern and keeps you guessing right up to the end of the picture. I thought it could have used some mood music at times to heighten tension in some spots, but on the whole it is a very entertaining 84 minutes without any perceptible down time which could have been edited out. Good, solid, if unspectacular, filmmaking. And don't forget; there is a unique ending as a bonus.
I disagree with most of the other reviewers and I felt it was a very good story (from a book by John Dickson Carr) which keeps the viewer off balance throughout. It is held together by old pros Stanwyck and Calhern and keeps you guessing right up to the end of the picture. I thought it could have used some mood music at times to heighten tension in some spots, but on the whole it is a very entertaining 84 minutes without any perceptible down time which could have been edited out. Good, solid, if unspectacular, filmmaking. And don't forget; there is a unique ending as a bonus.
The title for the film may sound simplistic, but there was just something very intriguing about the story. There may be a little bias though, being a fan of crime dramas/mystery thrillers (my favourite genres when it comes to film and television, books too). The cast also sounded very interesting and the actors forming it are a talented bunch, am especially fond of Barbara Stanwyck. She have her fair share of not particularly good films but she was always a strength and the main reason to see them.
Although she did do much better films than 'The Man with a Cloak', she did do worse as well. She comes off very well here, as to be expected, as do the rest of the cast. Without her, 'The Man with a Cloak' would have been one of those watchable but average fare sort of films. With her though the film is not great or quite one of those repeat viewings-worthy films, but it is worth seeing for fans of the cast and of the genre(s). Anybody that loves 40s crime dramas and mystery thrillers set in a different period will find 'The Man with a Cloak' too.
Stanwyck is the best thing about 'The Man with a Cloak'. Her performance has a lot of formidable steel to it that helps make her character more unsettling, while not making the character one-dimensional. Joseph Cotten is suitably enigmatic and has a dashing yet mysterious charisma. Louis Calhern's character is a colourful one (in personality) and he seemed to be enjoying himself. Leslie Caron is endearingly innocent and Joe DeSantis and Jim Backus are solid in their roles, Backus in a departure role.
It's not just the cast that are good. There is a lot of atmosphere to the production values, especially the use of lighting and the eerie settings. The score is suitably haunting. The script does have a good deal of snappy and intelligent parts and the direction is generally slick and comfortable within the genre. The story is generally fun and gripping with the turns in the plot preventing it from being obvious without being too much that it goes too far the other way. The big twist is not the most earth shattering of ones but it was clever at least.
Not a perfect film by all means though. 'The Man with a Cloak' would have benefitted from a tighter pace and what would have solved that would have been having a tauter script. Some of it is on the long-winded side and some of it comes over as quite stiff.
Furthermore, 'The Man with a Cloak' could have done with more suspense as the mystery was all present and correct but needed more spark.
Overall, worth seeing but not a must see. 7/10
Although she did do much better films than 'The Man with a Cloak', she did do worse as well. She comes off very well here, as to be expected, as do the rest of the cast. Without her, 'The Man with a Cloak' would have been one of those watchable but average fare sort of films. With her though the film is not great or quite one of those repeat viewings-worthy films, but it is worth seeing for fans of the cast and of the genre(s). Anybody that loves 40s crime dramas and mystery thrillers set in a different period will find 'The Man with a Cloak' too.
Stanwyck is the best thing about 'The Man with a Cloak'. Her performance has a lot of formidable steel to it that helps make her character more unsettling, while not making the character one-dimensional. Joseph Cotten is suitably enigmatic and has a dashing yet mysterious charisma. Louis Calhern's character is a colourful one (in personality) and he seemed to be enjoying himself. Leslie Caron is endearingly innocent and Joe DeSantis and Jim Backus are solid in their roles, Backus in a departure role.
It's not just the cast that are good. There is a lot of atmosphere to the production values, especially the use of lighting and the eerie settings. The score is suitably haunting. The script does have a good deal of snappy and intelligent parts and the direction is generally slick and comfortable within the genre. The story is generally fun and gripping with the turns in the plot preventing it from being obvious without being too much that it goes too far the other way. The big twist is not the most earth shattering of ones but it was clever at least.
Not a perfect film by all means though. 'The Man with a Cloak' would have benefitted from a tighter pace and what would have solved that would have been having a tauter script. Some of it is on the long-winded side and some of it comes over as quite stiff.
Furthermore, 'The Man with a Cloak' could have done with more suspense as the mystery was all present and correct but needed more spark.
Overall, worth seeing but not a must see. 7/10
- TheLittleSongbird
- Jun 23, 2020
- Permalink
Interesting period thriller about a young Frenchwoman (Leslie Caron) who comes to New York City looking for the grandfather (Louis Calhern) of her fiancé, a French patriot. She soon finds herself in the middle of a plot hatched by the grandfather's housekeeper (Barbara Stanwyck) to steal the old man's money. The only person she can turn to for help is a cloaked stranger (Joseph Cotten) she meets at a tavern.
Not bad but not great costumer. Stanwyck is fine. Caron is pretty and likable in just her second film. Cotten is the best part of the movie. His character's true identity is the movie's big twist. A twist that is likely spoiled for you if you read too much about this one before you see it. Still, the clues are there throughout the picture, such as the character's assumed name and a certain bird that appears throughout. Nice score by David Raskin helps set the mood of a routine story masked by its setting.
Not bad but not great costumer. Stanwyck is fine. Caron is pretty and likable in just her second film. Cotten is the best part of the movie. His character's true identity is the movie's big twist. A twist that is likely spoiled for you if you read too much about this one before you see it. Still, the clues are there throughout the picture, such as the character's assumed name and a certain bird that appears throughout. Nice score by David Raskin helps set the mood of a routine story masked by its setting.
Two years before The Man With A Cloak came out Paramount scored a great
success with The Heiress also set in the same time and place of New York in
the 1840s, specifically here 1848. I read here that this film was a box office
flop and that's a pity, it has a lot to offer.
Young Leslie Caron comes over from France, she's the fiance of the grandson of Louis Calhern a former French marshal of Napoleon who went into exile in America taking a considerable fortune with him. By rights his money should go to the grandson, but Calhern's household staff is scheming for it for themselves.
Barbara Stanwyck, Joe DeSantis, and Margaret Wycherly are the staff and Stanwyck of course is the brains of the crew. Stanwyck gets to play another of her coldhearted scheming females that she does so well. In this case a Phyllis Diedrichson of Henry James New York.
Playing the title role is Joseph Cotten, a mysterious and penniless traveler from Baltimore who meets Caron and becomes her protector. they have some great scenes.
Lots of similarities between The Man With A Cloak and The heiress. Same time and place in history and the same gothic and moody atmosphere in both. Why one film succeeds and the other doesn't who can really know about the fickle taste of the public.
As for Cotten he leaves New York leaving unpaid bills and worthless IOUs. The autograph on them would be worth millions now to the holder's descendants.
Young Leslie Caron comes over from France, she's the fiance of the grandson of Louis Calhern a former French marshal of Napoleon who went into exile in America taking a considerable fortune with him. By rights his money should go to the grandson, but Calhern's household staff is scheming for it for themselves.
Barbara Stanwyck, Joe DeSantis, and Margaret Wycherly are the staff and Stanwyck of course is the brains of the crew. Stanwyck gets to play another of her coldhearted scheming females that she does so well. In this case a Phyllis Diedrichson of Henry James New York.
Playing the title role is Joseph Cotten, a mysterious and penniless traveler from Baltimore who meets Caron and becomes her protector. they have some great scenes.
Lots of similarities between The Man With A Cloak and The heiress. Same time and place in history and the same gothic and moody atmosphere in both. Why one film succeeds and the other doesn't who can really know about the fickle taste of the public.
As for Cotten he leaves New York leaving unpaid bills and worthless IOUs. The autograph on them would be worth millions now to the holder's descendants.
- bkoganbing
- Apr 3, 2020
- Permalink
Joseph Cotten takes the lead in this genre-less film that takes place during the mid-1800s and is set in New York. Joe is a poor poet who frequents Jim Backus's bar far more often than he should, and when Leslie Caron blinks her doe eyes at him, he gets involved in a deadly mystery to help her. Leslie is on a mission to get some money from her boyfriend's grandfather, Louis Calhern. Louis is dead-set against his grandson, but he's taken with the French cutie pie so he agrees to hear her out. While staying in his house, however, Leslie gets the feeling his servants are trying to kill him, so she asks Joe to help her out.
Frank Fenton's screenplay is witty and smart, so even though this is a drama, there are several times when you'll laugh at Jo's drunken quips. As fun as it is to see Leslie Caron in her second film, she's still pretty green and doesn't really bring as much stage presence to the screen as her costars. But, with Barbara Stanwyck, Joseph Cotten, and Louis Calhern as her supporting players, they're able to buoy the movie up and make it enjoyable. Parts of this movie are suspenseful, parts are romantic, parts are funny, so there's a lot to keep your attention when you sit down during the afternoon to watch it. You might groan a bit at the far-fetched ending, but overall, it's pretty good.
Frank Fenton's screenplay is witty and smart, so even though this is a drama, there are several times when you'll laugh at Jo's drunken quips. As fun as it is to see Leslie Caron in her second film, she's still pretty green and doesn't really bring as much stage presence to the screen as her costars. But, with Barbara Stanwyck, Joseph Cotten, and Louis Calhern as her supporting players, they're able to buoy the movie up and make it enjoyable. Parts of this movie are suspenseful, parts are romantic, parts are funny, so there's a lot to keep your attention when you sit down during the afternoon to watch it. You might groan a bit at the far-fetched ending, but overall, it's pretty good.
- HotToastyRag
- Oct 29, 2018
- Permalink
- rmax304823
- Dec 16, 2008
- Permalink
Though it posses other solid elements perhaps the most interest that can be derived from this film is who is the titular The Man in the Cloak. Joseph Cotten doesn't bear much resemblance to the character hes playing but he's a decent fit for the part this movie calls for. Costarring with Cotten is Barbara Stanwyck as the scheming villainess, which she does best, but you have to wonder why the role is only three quarters an antagonist. And further down the cast you'll find a number of character actors who you maybe you cant name but you'll recognize them and they're reliable performances.
It's what you could call a clever movie and in more ways than one. There's sort of a murder mystery and of course a guessing game around the main character, but most of all the wit in each individual exchange keeps the movie playing most of all.
It's what you could call a clever movie and in more ways than one. There's sort of a murder mystery and of course a guessing game around the main character, but most of all the wit in each individual exchange keeps the movie playing most of all.
- RonellSowes
- Jul 10, 2023
- Permalink
It's 1848. Young Frenchwoman Madeline Minot (Leslie Caron) arrives in NYC to see Charles Francois Thevenet (Louis Calhern). He is the wealthy grandfather of her fiancé and had been with Napoleon. His grandson hopes that he's willing to support the Republic. She is introduced to Lorna Bounty (Barbara Stanwyck) who manages his affairs and tries to keep Minot away from him. She pushes her way in to ask for money to help the cause. Bounty and the butler Martin seems to be waiting for the old man to die and leave the fortune to them. They are not happy that Minot is invited to stay. The only man who helps her is the broke Dupin (Joseph Cotten), the man with a cloak. Minot tells him that they're trying to kill Thevenet.
The movie starts very simply and there is no mystery. There is some overacting and unimpressive writing at the beginning. The movie does improve a little. Stanwyck is quite good as a cold calculating character. She's like a black widow spider. However it's not as dark as it needs to be. I wanted the Dupin character to be more complicated and more murky. The movie never gets truly interesting. There is a reveal of the name at the end but I don't see it as that fascinating or that enlightening. It answers a question that nobody is even asking.
The movie starts very simply and there is no mystery. There is some overacting and unimpressive writing at the beginning. The movie does improve a little. Stanwyck is quite good as a cold calculating character. She's like a black widow spider. However it's not as dark as it needs to be. I wanted the Dupin character to be more complicated and more murky. The movie never gets truly interesting. There is a reveal of the name at the end but I don't see it as that fascinating or that enlightening. It answers a question that nobody is even asking.
- SnoopyStyle
- Aug 29, 2014
- Permalink
- jfarms1956
- Jul 12, 2014
- Permalink
Some motion pictures about famed literary writers come across rather stilted or insipid, but this is one of the more inspired productions. Much better than 20th Century Fox's THE LOVES OF EDGAR ALLAN POE, this film-- based on the life and legend of Poe-- comes to us from MGM and it boasts a wonderful cast: Joseph Cotten, Barbara Stanwyck, Louis Calhern, Leslie Caron, Jim Backus—need I go on? Stanwyck was a last-minute replacement for Marlene Dietrich, and while one wonders what putting Dietrich with Calhern would have been like, the results of this motion picture concoction are so smooth and so good that it seems to have turned out the way it should have. The film has some genuinely suspenseful moments, and it brims with atmosphere, enhanced by the studio's generally excellent production values.
- jarrodmcdonald-1
- Sep 16, 2014
- Permalink
Not bad, but aside from the "surprise" last denouement, quite an unremarkable period piece. A heavy bit of Melodrama with some interesting Dialog exchanges. It all seems rather confined and is not as much gloomy as it is less roomy.
Things are strung together with as much threading as necessary but it does seem to ramble a bit and is lesser for it. The suspense suffers as things can get a bit talky with much ado about drinking and fortunes.
But it is Worth a Watch for its sums are better than the parts and it comes together nicely, if suddenly, and makes the experience worthwhile. There are some offbeat Characters and some nice interplay, but in the end it could have used more tension and less talk.
Things are strung together with as much threading as necessary but it does seem to ramble a bit and is lesser for it. The suspense suffers as things can get a bit talky with much ado about drinking and fortunes.
But it is Worth a Watch for its sums are better than the parts and it comes together nicely, if suddenly, and makes the experience worthwhile. There are some offbeat Characters and some nice interplay, but in the end it could have used more tension and less talk.
- LeonLouisRicci
- May 15, 2013
- Permalink