College students attempt to solve a series of murders on campus while also trying to put together the school's big show.College students attempt to solve a series of murders on campus while also trying to put together the school's big show.College students attempt to solve a series of murders on campus while also trying to put together the school's big show.
Johnny Johnston
- Johnny Arnold
- (as Johnnie Johnston)
Eddy Chandler
- Plainclothesman
- (uncredited)
Richard Crane
- Freshman
- (uncredited)
Joel Dean
- Boy Student
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaOne of over 700 Paramount Productions, filmed between 1929 and 1949, which were sold to MCA/Universal in 1958 for television distribution, and have been owned and controlled by Universal ever since; its earliest documented telecasts took place in Seattle Friday 18 September 1959 on KIRO (Channel 7) and in Omaha Monday 26 October 1959 on KETV (Channel 7).
- ConnectionsRemake of College Scandal (1935)
- SoundtracksSweater Girl
Music by Jule Styne
Lyrics by Frank Loesser
Sung and danced by Eddie Bracken with the sweater girls and boys
Featured review
The year is 1942, and by that time, the movie making has matured, there had been quite outstanding mystery movies (eg Thin Man series), and in addition, the mystery literature of outstanding quality was already there for some time. So this poor attempt on a mystery-comedy-thriller can't be really swallowed without leaving a bit of bitter taste.
The movie per se, if I don't look at the inconsistencies, won't be really that bad, and one can afford to watch it, after putting the brain in some locker. But if the brain functions, one would start asking questions.
Why, Louise, supposed to be not only in love, but even secretly married, would flirt with all and sundry ? In fact whose daughter was Louise? It was mentioned that she wasn't the professor's real daughter, does it mean she was his step-daughter ? In that case she would have been complicit in the crime (which could explain her flirting), but that wasn't brought out. In fact, how could all the victim fail to recognize the murderer ? There can be no circumstances, under which one could say that they have not seen the person, at the scene of the original incident which prompted these crimes, and in their guilty conscience, that would have been permanently etched.
The thriller (attempt at) had been through forced creation of situations. Naturally considering the physique of the murderer and the murdered/ attempted, the strangling, even through a rope, would have been difficult and the poison, could have been sourced through Louise, I don't see how else.. The murderer wasn't a chemist, nor probably the other one, on which the fingers were pointed, probably was. Louise wasn't only a senior chemistry student, but had a free access to the lab.
Even in the end, just to put the audience on edge, the phone wasn't picked up. With the murders taking place, one after other, won't one ?
These are only some of the glaring inconsistencies. If I start listing all, it would take up all the space.
On the positive side, there are quite a few catchy songs, and the comedy sequences, some of them, are believable situational, and thankfully, without loud acting by either Eddie or June.
The movie per se, if I don't look at the inconsistencies, won't be really that bad, and one can afford to watch it, after putting the brain in some locker. But if the brain functions, one would start asking questions.
Why, Louise, supposed to be not only in love, but even secretly married, would flirt with all and sundry ? In fact whose daughter was Louise? It was mentioned that she wasn't the professor's real daughter, does it mean she was his step-daughter ? In that case she would have been complicit in the crime (which could explain her flirting), but that wasn't brought out. In fact, how could all the victim fail to recognize the murderer ? There can be no circumstances, under which one could say that they have not seen the person, at the scene of the original incident which prompted these crimes, and in their guilty conscience, that would have been permanently etched.
The thriller (attempt at) had been through forced creation of situations. Naturally considering the physique of the murderer and the murdered/ attempted, the strangling, even through a rope, would have been difficult and the poison, could have been sourced through Louise, I don't see how else.. The murderer wasn't a chemist, nor probably the other one, on which the fingers were pointed, probably was. Louise wasn't only a senior chemistry student, but had a free access to the lab.
Even in the end, just to put the audience on edge, the phone wasn't picked up. With the murders taking place, one after other, won't one ?
These are only some of the glaring inconsistencies. If I start listing all, it would take up all the space.
On the positive side, there are quite a few catchy songs, and the comedy sequences, some of them, are believable situational, and thankfully, without loud acting by either Eddie or June.
- sb-47-608737
- May 30, 2018
- Permalink
Details
- Runtime1 hour 17 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content