- Awards
- 1 win & 1 nomination total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe film is based on the real-life story of the WWII ace tank operator and Hero of the Soviet Union Alexandre Ivanovich Milukov.
Featured review
"To Paris" attracted Govorukhin with a big name. It was a last name written by mistake.
In principle, the presence of Litvinova and Efremova in the picture was immediately alarming, but what the hell was not joking. The description is interesting. Unfortunately, he could not surprise or believe that he simply got terribly boring and faceless. The only thing that impressed me was an old and well-known song.
Efremov played a drunken officer. As always, actually. Only professions are changing, the game remains stably template. Litvinova is already from the city of Paris. Next will be the role of the princess of the sea, probably. She played herself (like Efremov): with a claim to elitism and mystery. Nothing in general. Makovetsky did not leave the image of Grozny. Karkal, cursed, frowned. Did not impress. The rest of the actors are exactly. Neither good nor bad.
But to hell with this, be the plot interesting. But no. The genre of paintings remained familiar, and this is not drama, and not melodrama. And when there is nothing to show, I start to show the topics of brothels and other similar things. Indeed, part of the audience will be immediately interested in this. It's just not entirely clear how this relates to the Great Patriotic War. Nothing more to show about her? Or is there nothing more to do in Paris? There's nothing to look at? They will be waiting for a fun adventure, easy action with unobtrusive humor. But this was not. Not at all.
The film left no impression. The characters are not disclosed, the plot is fresh, there are no events, in fact. The only word that can describe this film is: "no."
2 out of 10
In principle, the presence of Litvinova and Efremova in the picture was immediately alarming, but what the hell was not joking. The description is interesting. Unfortunately, he could not surprise or believe that he simply got terribly boring and faceless. The only thing that impressed me was an old and well-known song.
Efremov played a drunken officer. As always, actually. Only professions are changing, the game remains stably template. Litvinova is already from the city of Paris. Next will be the role of the princess of the sea, probably. She played herself (like Efremov): with a claim to elitism and mystery. Nothing in general. Makovetsky did not leave the image of Grozny. Karkal, cursed, frowned. Did not impress. The rest of the actors are exactly. Neither good nor bad.
But to hell with this, be the plot interesting. But no. The genre of paintings remained familiar, and this is not drama, and not melodrama. And when there is nothing to show, I start to show the topics of brothels and other similar things. Indeed, part of the audience will be immediately interested in this. It's just not entirely clear how this relates to the Great Patriotic War. Nothing more to show about her? Or is there nothing more to do in Paris? There's nothing to look at? They will be waiting for a fun adventure, easy action with unobtrusive humor. But this was not. Not at all.
The film left no impression. The characters are not disclosed, the plot is fresh, there are no events, in fact. The only word that can describe this film is: "no."
2 out of 10
Details
Box office
- Budget
- RUR 180,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $142,748
- Runtime1 hour 35 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content