15 reviews
- tcworthington
- Feb 19, 2018
- Permalink
This is the most perplexing crap I've ever seen. Is it sincere mumblecore or is all the awkwardness due to a poor writing/subpar acting? Definitely has good moments, definitely has terrible moments. I don't know
- lukejacobson
- Jul 14, 2019
- Permalink
The actors did good if you look at their individual performances. They're acting and presentation of their roles is really nice but it was all let down by a very weak story.
I felt that the makers of Person to person tried too hard to make an anthology (?) which would be super plain and blow people's minds....but they missed.
I don't know what it takes to make a good anthology movie because I'm not a writer or director but this isn't it.
I started watching for the actors and finished it for them too. The story doesn't have the strength to keep you hooked.
Some bland and simple movies make you feel human and that's what was unsuccessfully attempted with person to person.
I felt that the makers of Person to person tried too hard to make an anthology (?) which would be super plain and blow people's minds....but they missed.
I don't know what it takes to make a good anthology movie because I'm not a writer or director but this isn't it.
I started watching for the actors and finished it for them too. The story doesn't have the strength to keep you hooked.
Some bland and simple movies make you feel human and that's what was unsuccessfully attempted with person to person.
It took me a minute to get on this movie's wavelength, but I started really digging it about halfway through; I think it was the bike chase that ultimately won me over, or maybe it was the progression of the Michael Cera / Abbi Jacobson relationship. Since finishing the film, it's only grown in my estimation. It's a scrappy, messy, funny, quiet, insightful indie comedy that I may still be underrating.
- matthewssilverhammer
- Jun 30, 2022
- Permalink
The movie follows an ensemble cast of characters as they face various situations in their lives, all in one day in New York City. The humor here can be subtle and quirky at times, but the film itself loses steam, in my opinion, as it progresses and ends up not really going anywhere.
There were moments when I felt this indie had a Woody Allen feel to it, but those moments were too few and far between. All in all, some sparks of cleverness but they just weren't sustained.
There were moments when I felt this indie had a Woody Allen feel to it, but those moments were too few and far between. All in all, some sparks of cleverness but they just weren't sustained.
I was intrigued by the trailer and looked forward to viewing Person to Person for quite a while. Perhaps it's my fault for having high expectations, but this fell completely flat.
I love Woody Allen movies. For whatever reason, I expected this to be rival some of Allen's recent work with witty, humorous dialogue that goes by quickly with a smart theme. Person to Person includes neither. It's empty, illogical, and boring.
This may sound like a compliment, but I mean it in the worst way possible: The movie flows like a mixture of a Todd Solondz movie mixed with Jim Jarmusch. However, it lacks the awkward sleaziness of Solondz and the uniqueness of most Jarmusch films.
The story follows multiple New Yorkers throughout one day - this has been done before many times and more successfully. Michael Cera and his story shines while the others relentlessly drag on. I lost interest in every other character pretty early on. The writing is mediocre and many of the actors struggle through the corny lines and story-lines.
In short, the subtle tone here falls flat. I really wanted to love Person to Person, but it's simply boring and insignificant.
I love Woody Allen movies. For whatever reason, I expected this to be rival some of Allen's recent work with witty, humorous dialogue that goes by quickly with a smart theme. Person to Person includes neither. It's empty, illogical, and boring.
This may sound like a compliment, but I mean it in the worst way possible: The movie flows like a mixture of a Todd Solondz movie mixed with Jim Jarmusch. However, it lacks the awkward sleaziness of Solondz and the uniqueness of most Jarmusch films.
The story follows multiple New Yorkers throughout one day - this has been done before many times and more successfully. Michael Cera and his story shines while the others relentlessly drag on. I lost interest in every other character pretty early on. The writing is mediocre and many of the actors struggle through the corny lines and story-lines.
In short, the subtle tone here falls flat. I really wanted to love Person to Person, but it's simply boring and insignificant.
The writing in this film is horrible but the directing is even worse. Most of the acting was terrible also. Writer/Director Dustin Guy Defa should be ashamed of himself for this waste of time film. I really wanted to turn it off, but I'm the type that has to see a movie to its end no matter how horrible it is, hoping there might be something worthwhile watching it to it's end, but not in this case. If I ever take notice of Dustin Guy Defa's name in credits again I will not watch it because he did such a horrible job Directing the garbage he wrote. Have you ever seen someone that can't read very well and struggle to read something? Trying to read the letters word for word something that they weren't familiar with and never read before, that is what these non-actors sounded like with absolutely no emotion! There's no way these actors rehearsed their lines. I was honestly looking for the cue cards in the background. And the director should've seen this and try to correct it. Most of the actors seemed to be disorientated or confused and had to fake their lines. I was always under the impression that actors was supposed to do their job emotionally and physically; to be believable like the actor really is that person. (Michael Cera as Phil and Philip Baker Hall as and Jimmy Isiah Whitlock Jr. As Buster are good actors. But your not going to sound good when you have dialog this awful.) Seriously do not waste your time and find something else decent to watch.
- rockinrobert2003
- Jun 30, 2021
- Permalink
I had never even heard of this movie before clicking on it (I've recently fallen in love with Michael Cera and searched his name on Hulu in a desperate attempt to find something other than his more popular films such as Scott Pilgrim VS the World, Superbad, or Juno.). I went into it expecting nothing, but I was pleasantly surprised. The movie follows four people in New York City over the course of one day, each facing their own unique trials. The movie is definitely on the edgy-artsy-indie side and has that certain awkward and uncomfortable air around the characters and dialogue. It was interesting throughout the entire film. I was surprised when it ended because I was so captivated that it felt like it just started. You'll never guess what'll happen next.
If you're looking for a happy ending with a complete resolution, this isn't the movie for you. The characters don't really have a complete wrap up and round off except for Benny. It leaves you slightly dissatisfied, but I still enjoyed the movie.
The characters are all extremely lovable and relatable despite how odd and unique they are. The movie was well executed.
- trinitywhitleyf
- Mar 24, 2019
- Permalink
A look at a day in the life of a bunch of new yorkers, with their own tasks to complete. And because it's new york, everyone is a bit quirky. Some familiar faces...michael cera was in every film, for a while. He and the writer had made "entertainment" together in 2015. Tavi gevinson was on gossip girl. Abbi jacobson was the mind behind "broad city"; i didn't see it, but it was nominated for some emmies. In one story, the cops are investigating a murder, so phil hires claire to help dig into a murder, for his paper. But he's a terrible reporter. A couple of the stories just weren't that interesting. I kept waiting for the various stories to intersect. But they never do. Some negatives... wendy talks in long, run-on sentences, which gets annoying fast. When the cops go to arrest someone, they don't identify themselves as cops, they don't say what they want, and no-one shows a badge. The script needed work; maybe the writer should have concentrated on one of the stories, and really developed it. This grouping of short, unrelated tales doesn't really go anywhere. Written and directed by dustin defa. It's such a random group of ideas that didn't catch my interest.
Throwback to when movies were allowed to be simple and speak for themselves.
Of course today this movie is going to miss the mark for most people but us older folk who can appreciate a simply good movie that has a simple stories to tell and are able to let it play out will APPRECIATE it. Some characters grow. Some, well some do just the opposite.
Several story lines which appear to be in complete different directions. But are they? I dont know if writer/director would want to hear this but if you like Woody Allen storylines and old school feel, without the uptight anxious sensation, then you should give this a try. Sorry to the writer if he get this a lot.
Of course today this movie is going to miss the mark for most people but us older folk who can appreciate a simply good movie that has a simple stories to tell and are able to let it play out will APPRECIATE it. Some characters grow. Some, well some do just the opposite.
Several story lines which appear to be in complete different directions. But are they? I dont know if writer/director would want to hear this but if you like Woody Allen storylines and old school feel, without the uptight anxious sensation, then you should give this a try. Sorry to the writer if he get this a lot.
- jamiesbeck
- Nov 19, 2022
- Permalink
I can definitely see people being bored with this movie. I've seen a lot of movies like it that fail miserably and are relentlessly boring. This film is different. I liked ALL of the characters. They all carried a distinct persona despite limited screen-time and are very relatable. Each person is layered and genuine, none of whom are wholly good or bad. The humor is subtle yet gratifying and conflicts are handled maturely.
In a sense this movie connects all the disparate parts of the self: the quiet and anxious Abbi, the desperate showoff in Cera, the gloomy brooder in Ray, the arrogant insecure teen in Wendy, the insecure lovestruck teen in Melanie, and the passionate local "hero." Nothing feels forced or contrived. I can definitely see myself watching this many times in the future. I honestly didn't mind the lack of action and drama because I just wanted to sit with each character.
I can assure you I'm not a paid shill either. This movie isn't for everyone, but if you give it a chance I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.
In a sense this movie connects all the disparate parts of the self: the quiet and anxious Abbi, the desperate showoff in Cera, the gloomy brooder in Ray, the arrogant insecure teen in Wendy, the insecure lovestruck teen in Melanie, and the passionate local "hero." Nothing feels forced or contrived. I can definitely see myself watching this many times in the future. I honestly didn't mind the lack of action and drama because I just wanted to sit with each character.
I can assure you I'm not a paid shill either. This movie isn't for everyone, but if you give it a chance I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.
- darkdaxtervc
- May 2, 2020
- Permalink
This movie made me laugh, has great, memorable characters and a terrific Michael Cera performance. What more do you want? For the right person, the movie is as simply satisfying as a Sunday morning.
I loved the good-natured Bene Coopersmith. Great ensemble cast, great rhythm, and it's not too often we're served with endings like that!
I don't really see the flatness or dullness or empty simplicity I'm reading about in the negative reviews. I liked the stream of consciousness vibe and think we saw a good mix of existential dread, and the passions that lead us on journeys either away from, or back to that existential dread.
I really enjoyed that ending.
I don't really see the flatness or dullness or empty simplicity I'm reading about in the negative reviews. I liked the stream of consciousness vibe and think we saw a good mix of existential dread, and the passions that lead us on journeys either away from, or back to that existential dread.
I really enjoyed that ending.
- campbel-11998
- Jun 8, 2022
- Permalink
- markerdasharker
- Aug 5, 2020
- Permalink