36 reviews
- studio-tampus
- Jan 12, 2021
- Permalink
This film depicts the glorified version of Spanish colonizers and not the real truth where they killed indigenous Filipinos to take over their land. Magellan was not a hero, he was the REAL villain. He died fighting Lapu-lapu and as he should.
- jelosuliguin
- Jul 30, 2020
- Permalink
I would have appreciated this movie more if they have taken 2 sides of the story, read both histories and learn who is the real enemy...
- wtobyshaun
- Apr 1, 2020
- Permalink
Rated G for - Garbage!!
This movie demonizes the natives who fought against the colonizers.
This movie demonizes the natives who fought against the colonizers.
Ban this from our theaters. if you support this abomination, it only means the colonizers still won over us even today, after 500 years. it's like making a fun, family-friendly 3d-animated movie about columbus taking over and erasing american indians from their homeland or the whites selling africans as slaves. "grabbed the helm of history and changed its course forever"??? by oppressing, murdering, raping my race? they're profiting from the defeat of our ancestors and trivializing the shame that our race had to go through for centuries. i can't believe how there are still filipinos who are excited about this. indeed, our textbooks did not educate us enough to antagonize the enemy. instead, we support them. i am utterly heartbroken. the creators of this show should have known better. if no one's starting a petition, i will.
in behalf of my fellow men who are deeply blinded by colonial mentality, i apologize to rajah humabon, rajah tupas, jose rizal, francisco dagohoy, tamblot, antonio luna, andres bonifacio, bienvenido santos, and nvm gonzales. im so sorry. 😭 sirs, your descendants failed you. it seems your lives and works were wasted 💔💔
in behalf of my fellow men who are deeply blinded by colonial mentality, i apologize to rajah humabon, rajah tupas, jose rizal, francisco dagohoy, tamblot, antonio luna, andres bonifacio, bienvenido santos, and nvm gonzales. im so sorry. 😭 sirs, your descendants failed you. it seems your lives and works were wasted 💔💔
- graves_roses
- Nov 5, 2019
- Permalink
Magalhães was a Portuguese Sailor/Navigator, not a colonizer like some people say here. He made the trip, the arrangements and everything even diying in the process to finish the travel. not this spanish guy. No one knows El Cano, what spain trying to make here its to taint the image of a great explorer of the world, and one of the ilustrous Portuguese Sailors of all history, And again he was not a colonizer like some people say here. he was a traveller, trying to discover new routes for comerce. Read something about history please,
- jorge-massano
- Apr 15, 2020
- Permalink
The other reviewer was right, the scene that "specifics" cry about last only a couple of minutes, well maybe not the most accurate portrayal of their appearance but this is Spanish kids show not a accurate account of historical piece that shove to general public. Of course the logic of the film is Spanish - good; everyone else - bad. Isn't that a common practice on most movies in Hollywood?
If there are injustices I think the one who should complain are the Portuguese, they are portrayed as straight bad guys but they are not crying like those "specifics". As if the "specifics" has concrete basis and knowledge on their ancient history, what happened is they let their neighbors wrote their own history for them?
The movie was entertaining, the animation was average and the characters were likeable (except Yago). Don't listen to the haters they just hopped on hate train without seeing the movie first and the bias that "butchered their history". How can you 'butchered' that something that doesn't exist?
If there are injustices I think the one who should complain are the Portuguese, they are portrayed as straight bad guys but they are not crying like those "specifics". As if the "specifics" has concrete basis and knowledge on their ancient history, what happened is they let their neighbors wrote their own history for them?
The movie was entertaining, the animation was average and the characters were likeable (except Yago). Don't listen to the haters they just hopped on hate train without seeing the movie first and the bias that "butchered their history". How can you 'butchered' that something that doesn't exist?
- selvadorada300
- Sep 3, 2021
- Permalink
Magellan is no hero. He's a colonizer. A lot of blood was shed and innocent lives lost. Why make a movie about colonizers?
Who's gonna watch this? White supremacists?
Who's gonna watch this? White supremacists?
This fast-paced, 1.5 hour, animated film is fictionalized history meant for Spanish kids. The plot is for the fleet to sail west, past the Americas, get spices from the Moluccas, and sail back to Spain, all while avoiding the Portuguese. The portion that Filipino reviewers (who haven't even seen this movie) complain about lasts for about 5-7 minutes, when the protagonists make a brief stop in Cebu and Mactan islands. Lapu-lapu, the Mactan chief, appears for a few seconds and is a brave, muscular guy, as opposed to the corpulent Humabon, the king of Cebu. The battle of Mactan lasts for about a minute. There is nothing about "colonization" in this film. It is all about survival and discovery in the first circumnavigation of the world. Oh, and by the way, I am also Filipino.
It is fashionable to insult past personalities because of their connection with Central Europe's colonial past. It's considered something "modern", and also a sign of sensitivity towards offended peoples, that is, the natives of countries colonized by Europeans. First, let me make a note to those who were outraged by a film about "colonizers": I am the Devil. I'm your worst nightmare, the incarnation of your hatreds, and I'm glad for it. Not only am I Portuguese, I am also a descendant of inquisitors, slave traders and navigators. But the most important thing (because I don't allow myself to be defined by my ancestors) is that I am a historian, for me the past is a serious matter.
As a historian, I say that the past is not judged, not censored, not rewritten to our liking and in the light of political correctness. The past is accepted as it is, so that we really learn something from it. And the truth is that until the 19th century (well, and even later sometimes), Europeans saw the world exclusively from their point of view. That is, if a newly discovered land had no Europeans living in it, it was from the European country that discovered and occupied it. This is wrong for us, because we see the rights of native peoples differently, but this is how Europeans thought, and it's not correct that we, today, are condemning them for acting in accordance with the mental and civilizational principles of their world and time! They could not have known that, five hundred years later, we would have completely different ideas, and we cannot expect men who lived in 1500 to behave like men from the year 2000. What I suggest, therefore, is that we know how to understand the past as he is, and understand the way of thinking of those men instead of judge them in light of what is right for us. It's the only way we don't say, or write, a lot of nonsense.
Regardless of opinions about the maritime expansion of Portugal or Castile (here, the film makes a mistake: Spain did not exist), the voyage made by Fernão de Magalhães (Magellan) was an unprecedented naval feat that continued for a long time without parallel: the two countries, in the Treaty of Tordesillas, had divided among themselves not only the right to the discovered lands but also the right to navigate the oceans: thus, going around the world was prohibited even for this trip and if Elcano did it, it was for get home alive. Magalhães was Portuguese and went to the Moluccas Islands - now in Indonesia - around 1501, in the service of the Portuguese king and before moving to Castile (he did so because the King of Portugal did not want to increase his salary). With this voyage, he became the first man to circle the world. Elcano, and the men he took home, became the first to circle the world in a single voyage. However, the main objective of this expedition was, as the film tells us, to sail westwards, through a passage between the South Atlantic and the Indian Ocean, and create a Spanish route to the Moluccas, an archipelago that the Castilians thought to be in their share of the world (the precise calculation of longitude led to doubts surrounding the rights over these islands).
The voyage took three years, one more than planned, had five ships and about 250 sailors of various countries (and at least 20 Portuguese). The passage between the oceans was discovered - it is the Strait of Magellan - but the main objective failed: the Moluccas were controlled by the Portuguese, and it was not possible to create the imagined route. Incidentally, Magalhães imagined a smaller world because he was unaware of the immensity of the Pacific Ocean. The Portuguese route was more viable and even safer. Great losses were added to this failure: the only ship that returned, with Elcano, had 18 sailors. Many men were killed or captured by the Portuguese, and the total number of survivors is about fifty people.
This film manages, somehow, to give some color to this whole story and continue what the Portuguese-Spanish history books did: transforming a voyage that went very badly into a success in the naval exploration of the two Iberian countries, something that Portuguese and Spanish people are proud of having done. Things are not as simple, the film gives way to playful factors and fun. It's not a documentary, it's a movie made to entertain. Of course, the film has a lot of anachronisms, there are a lot of situations where the characters act like us and think like us. There are gypsies reading fortunes when religious fanaticism prohibited it as witchcraft, there are women in knee-length skirts, men who hold cannons in their own hands and even some romance. Ironically, the villains are the Portuguese, the nation of Magalhães and which forgave this navigator long ago. Good and colorful cinematography in a funny portrayal of a remarkable trip around the world are the biggest attractions of this film.
As a historian, I say that the past is not judged, not censored, not rewritten to our liking and in the light of political correctness. The past is accepted as it is, so that we really learn something from it. And the truth is that until the 19th century (well, and even later sometimes), Europeans saw the world exclusively from their point of view. That is, if a newly discovered land had no Europeans living in it, it was from the European country that discovered and occupied it. This is wrong for us, because we see the rights of native peoples differently, but this is how Europeans thought, and it's not correct that we, today, are condemning them for acting in accordance with the mental and civilizational principles of their world and time! They could not have known that, five hundred years later, we would have completely different ideas, and we cannot expect men who lived in 1500 to behave like men from the year 2000. What I suggest, therefore, is that we know how to understand the past as he is, and understand the way of thinking of those men instead of judge them in light of what is right for us. It's the only way we don't say, or write, a lot of nonsense.
Regardless of opinions about the maritime expansion of Portugal or Castile (here, the film makes a mistake: Spain did not exist), the voyage made by Fernão de Magalhães (Magellan) was an unprecedented naval feat that continued for a long time without parallel: the two countries, in the Treaty of Tordesillas, had divided among themselves not only the right to the discovered lands but also the right to navigate the oceans: thus, going around the world was prohibited even for this trip and if Elcano did it, it was for get home alive. Magalhães was Portuguese and went to the Moluccas Islands - now in Indonesia - around 1501, in the service of the Portuguese king and before moving to Castile (he did so because the King of Portugal did not want to increase his salary). With this voyage, he became the first man to circle the world. Elcano, and the men he took home, became the first to circle the world in a single voyage. However, the main objective of this expedition was, as the film tells us, to sail westwards, through a passage between the South Atlantic and the Indian Ocean, and create a Spanish route to the Moluccas, an archipelago that the Castilians thought to be in their share of the world (the precise calculation of longitude led to doubts surrounding the rights over these islands).
The voyage took three years, one more than planned, had five ships and about 250 sailors of various countries (and at least 20 Portuguese). The passage between the oceans was discovered - it is the Strait of Magellan - but the main objective failed: the Moluccas were controlled by the Portuguese, and it was not possible to create the imagined route. Incidentally, Magalhães imagined a smaller world because he was unaware of the immensity of the Pacific Ocean. The Portuguese route was more viable and even safer. Great losses were added to this failure: the only ship that returned, with Elcano, had 18 sailors. Many men were killed or captured by the Portuguese, and the total number of survivors is about fifty people.
This film manages, somehow, to give some color to this whole story and continue what the Portuguese-Spanish history books did: transforming a voyage that went very badly into a success in the naval exploration of the two Iberian countries, something that Portuguese and Spanish people are proud of having done. Things are not as simple, the film gives way to playful factors and fun. It's not a documentary, it's a movie made to entertain. Of course, the film has a lot of anachronisms, there are a lot of situations where the characters act like us and think like us. There are gypsies reading fortunes when religious fanaticism prohibited it as witchcraft, there are women in knee-length skirts, men who hold cannons in their own hands and even some romance. Ironically, the villains are the Portuguese, the nation of Magalhães and which forgave this navigator long ago. Good and colorful cinematography in a funny portrayal of a remarkable trip around the world are the biggest attractions of this film.
- filipemanuelneto
- May 1, 2023
- Permalink
This is just romanticizing colonizers!! How dare you make a movie about this? Disgusting!
- eztrellpinote
- Oct 18, 2020
- Permalink
The worst animation film i've seen. Period.
Im living in Sevilla albeit im from Barcelona; the accent is ridiculous. All the film is bad, annoying even for childs.
- phranzyscko
- May 20, 2020
- Permalink
The animation looks like this was made in the early 2000s and that's putting it mildly.
- bdcarandang-85637
- Oct 19, 2020
- Permalink
Magellan's story is a good material for a movie. But there is no excuse to justify his action and make the county he colonized an enemy. Story should be faithful to history specially a film that targeted young generations. This is a straight brainwash for them.
Highly disrespectful and historically incorrect. Enslavement on indigenous people and a hostile takeover from colonizers should not be glorified in any type of movie. Specifically one geared toward children. Do yourselves a favor a cancel the movie
- kevin_endow
- Nov 6, 2019
- Permalink
- nogodnomasters
- Feb 29, 2020
- Permalink
Even after all these years you's expect a Spain to have some class, but with this movie they clearly have no regard for the countless atrocities they visited upon their colonies.
It could be said that this movie was done in poor taste. Spain came to our country and ENSLAVED our people for over 300 years. They murdered countless men, women, and children and exploited our lands. They destroyed our cultural identity and even named our land after a king we didn't vote for. They even had the gall to sell us to the Americans who so happily obliged even if our land was not theirs to sell.
Do not think our country has forgotten the sins Spain perpetuated during their time as colonizers. If Spain even has an ounce of respect, she would deliver an apology for this debasement!
It could be said that this movie was done in poor taste. Spain came to our country and ENSLAVED our people for over 300 years. They murdered countless men, women, and children and exploited our lands. They destroyed our cultural identity and even named our land after a king we didn't vote for. They even had the gall to sell us to the Americans who so happily obliged even if our land was not theirs to sell.
Do not think our country has forgotten the sins Spain perpetuated during their time as colonizers. If Spain even has an ounce of respect, she would deliver an apology for this debasement!
I've just seen the movie and I didn't see anything offensive to anybody, except maybe to the Portuguese who were depicted as the villains in the movie. I do not understand what the hullabaloo is all about as nothing is insulting to my sensibilities. In fact, the opposite is true - they tried to be as accurate with their "Visayan" language as possible and for that I thank the producers. Watch the movie and learn. I AM A FILIPINO, from MACTAN who teaches college Philippine history AND who has shown this movie to my students. ANd We Learned a Lot Watching This Movie.
- emilioacedo
- Feb 16, 2020
- Permalink
Just as a heads up, this is coming from a Filipino, more specifically a Cebuano.
I am absolutely disgusted by this movie. It whitewashes history, and portrays my ancestors as the villains. It is yet another film glorifying white colonizers who STOLE natives lands, spread disease, and SLAUGHTERED THEM. This should not be the subject of a family film.
Just because it is fictionalized doesn't mean that it is okay. I know for a fact some children will see this (because it is a FAMILY film) and take it as a fact.
This glorifies some of the most monstrous human beings in the history of the world.
The move has the AUDACITY to portray the Filipinos fighting for their land as savages. When in fact, we had a civilization built up at the time, we had art, a dense culture, social classes, etc.
THIS IS NOT AN EDUCATIONAL MOVIE UNLESS YOU ARE A WHITE SUPREMICIST WHO WISHES TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE ERASURE OF HISTORY.
Honestly, I am fuming. Do not show this to your children, don't even watch it. This contributes to stereotypes of multiple groups of POC, and contributes to the ideas that the colonizers in history (who were all white) did something good, because they obviously did not.
The fact that this move was even made in this day and age is disgusting.
I am absolutely disgusted by this movie. It whitewashes history, and portrays my ancestors as the villains. It is yet another film glorifying white colonizers who STOLE natives lands, spread disease, and SLAUGHTERED THEM. This should not be the subject of a family film.
Just because it is fictionalized doesn't mean that it is okay. I know for a fact some children will see this (because it is a FAMILY film) and take it as a fact.
This glorifies some of the most monstrous human beings in the history of the world.
The move has the AUDACITY to portray the Filipinos fighting for their land as savages. When in fact, we had a civilization built up at the time, we had art, a dense culture, social classes, etc.
THIS IS NOT AN EDUCATIONAL MOVIE UNLESS YOU ARE A WHITE SUPREMICIST WHO WISHES TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE ERASURE OF HISTORY.
Honestly, I am fuming. Do not show this to your children, don't even watch it. This contributes to stereotypes of multiple groups of POC, and contributes to the ideas that the colonizers in history (who were all white) did something good, because they obviously did not.
The fact that this move was even made in this day and age is disgusting.
- coolestratt
- Aug 10, 2020
- Permalink
- rolandpalma
- Jul 7, 2021
- Permalink
One of Magellan greatest achievement? Yea He like destroyed the culture of Philippines because they believed that they are influence by demons, They force Filipinos to work under them treating them as slaves, They oppressed Filipinos leveling them to Animals. And He didn't dicover Philippines he just landed on it.
- adireknorkam
- Nov 14, 2019
- Permalink
In this movie Filipinos are reffered to as savages even though it is the other way around. The EVIL spanish colonizers efdectively ruined a whole culture. This paints our National Hero, "Lapu Lapu" a person who tried ro protect our land as a villain when in fact Magellan is responsible for the Spanish taking our land killing our people and forcing us to adopt a religion. Then the writers have the audacity to give Magellan a Filipina girlfriend! This is so wrong on so many different levels. Who ever sees this don't add positive reviews please becuase then you'll support Colonizers and no type of colonizer is a good one.
- jakartakiings
- Aug 13, 2020
- Permalink
The most disgusting movie ever existed. Historically Inaccurate. Boring and waste of time.
- ilovenickser
- Oct 25, 2020
- Permalink
It is disgusting that a movie like this is being made and celebrated today. Magellan is no hero but a colonizer who destroyed the innocent lives of people and erased the culture and legacies of the Filipino people.
- silin-72317
- Nov 5, 2019
- Permalink