I don't care what the nay-sayers are saying. Did they apply objectivity? Or were their thoughts ruled by subjectivity? Is the movie far-fetched? Possibly. But maybe the critics didn't notice it's an example of cold hard reason vs caring emotion? Or, perhaps they failed to notice the dark bureaucracy vs the ever-present humanity of living life in that kind of environment and the stress that that would cause? And lastly, it's very likely the detractors of this short but effective movie failed to pick up on the fact that (aside from the one commercial snuck into it) it's a professionally-made 43 minutes and 30 seconds long, uninterrupted, unedited scene?