The film is about 45 minutes too long, as others have remarked. Its clear that the Director got carried away. There are some plot developments that do not fit at all with the original movie. Sometimes, when Directors get their hands on a bigger budget, they feel they have to expand the plots and runtime. Less is always more!
The plot elements add confusion to a simple plot, which had it been kept to around 90 minutes, would have had more impact. The carnage was not as bad as the internet hype made it out to be. None of this type of carnage was new. It had been done in many other movies already.
I think the Creator of "Terrifier 2" put extra thematic story lines into the sequel unnecessarily.
It borders on fantasy or sci-fi in the end. My advice to the Creator or Director is to "Keep it short and sweet."
The plot elements add confusion to a simple plot, which had it been kept to around 90 minutes, would have had more impact. The carnage was not as bad as the internet hype made it out to be. None of this type of carnage was new. It had been done in many other movies already.
I think the Creator of "Terrifier 2" put extra thematic story lines into the sequel unnecessarily.
It borders on fantasy or sci-fi in the end. My advice to the Creator or Director is to "Keep it short and sweet."