I am so upset over Judge Karen's decision today. She chose to teach the
plaintiff a lesson because she loaned the defendant $4000 after only 3
dates to purchase a car and he was to repay on payday.....Judge said
the plaintiff needed to learn a lesson..... first off this was a "verbal" contract and the defendant paid her $1000 (which proves he knew it
wasn't a gift)..... I understand why the judge wanted her to "learn"
not to loan a boyfriend money but what lesson did it teach him? Judge
should've just went by the evidence not her place to "teach" a
lesson......
plaintiff a lesson because she loaned the defendant $4000 after only 3
dates to purchase a car and he was to repay on payday.....Judge said
the plaintiff needed to learn a lesson..... first off this was a "verbal" contract and the defendant paid her $1000 (which proves he knew it
wasn't a gift)..... I understand why the judge wanted her to "learn"
not to loan a boyfriend money but what lesson did it teach him? Judge
should've just went by the evidence not her place to "teach" a
lesson......