...at least keep the noise down.
This is literally one of the films, I would watch to the end under these circumstances only: you put a gun to my head, you hold my family member hostage, you pay me a lot of money (hey, I like this option much better than the rest, hit me up - start a GFM for a few hundred thousand $ and I'll give it another shot), you end a war (also pretty good). At the moment, I can't think of other reasons.
I've watched probably thousands of horror and "horror" films over the decades, as I watch at least one, but probably around 3 every week, some I've seen many times, some I just barely watched the one time. Even the most low budget films usually have at least something. At least it's funny, how badly it's done, or something.
This one I've attempted in 2005, and again yesterday.
The corniest behaviours, the ciggy, the pathetic bad boy attitude (like the redhead guy from csi, or whatever the show is, that pulls down his shades - that's the level of corniness), the useless characters, that add absolutely nothing, the lowest rent special effect demons - just put a guy there, who looks menacing and says "I am demon" (or he can have a "demon" name tag on his shirt? Still more believable and scary, than anything in this film, instead of the "swarm of cockroaches demon", or whatever that was supposed to be.
I get, that there's Keanu Reeves fanboys and fangirls, good for you. Apparently, he's a good guy in real life - which is fantastic..but this film is still lame. I get, that there's comic book fans, but this was "meh"-er, than the "meh"-est episode of Supernatural, and I've seen all of them..and there were some pretty meh episodes there.
The hell effects were well done. That's the only reason, why it doesn't get 1*, but 2.
This is literally one of the films, I would watch to the end under these circumstances only: you put a gun to my head, you hold my family member hostage, you pay me a lot of money (hey, I like this option much better than the rest, hit me up - start a GFM for a few hundred thousand $ and I'll give it another shot), you end a war (also pretty good). At the moment, I can't think of other reasons.
I've watched probably thousands of horror and "horror" films over the decades, as I watch at least one, but probably around 3 every week, some I've seen many times, some I just barely watched the one time. Even the most low budget films usually have at least something. At least it's funny, how badly it's done, or something.
This one I've attempted in 2005, and again yesterday.
The corniest behaviours, the ciggy, the pathetic bad boy attitude (like the redhead guy from csi, or whatever the show is, that pulls down his shades - that's the level of corniness), the useless characters, that add absolutely nothing, the lowest rent special effect demons - just put a guy there, who looks menacing and says "I am demon" (or he can have a "demon" name tag on his shirt? Still more believable and scary, than anything in this film, instead of the "swarm of cockroaches demon", or whatever that was supposed to be.
I get, that there's Keanu Reeves fanboys and fangirls, good for you. Apparently, he's a good guy in real life - which is fantastic..but this film is still lame. I get, that there's comic book fans, but this was "meh"-er, than the "meh"-est episode of Supernatural, and I've seen all of them..and there were some pretty meh episodes there.
The hell effects were well done. That's the only reason, why it doesn't get 1*, but 2.