Em uma cidade do futuro próximo onde a opulência sem limites ofusca as dificuldades econômicas, Gwen e sua filha Jules fazem o melhor que podem para manter a alegria juntas, apesar da instab... Ler tudoEm uma cidade do futuro próximo onde a opulência sem limites ofusca as dificuldades econômicas, Gwen e sua filha Jules fazem o melhor que podem para manter a alegria juntas, apesar da instabilidade que está surgindo em seu mundo.Em uma cidade do futuro próximo onde a opulência sem limites ofusca as dificuldades econômicas, Gwen e sua filha Jules fazem o melhor que podem para manter a alegria juntas, apesar da instabilidade que está surgindo em seu mundo.
- Prêmios
- 7 vitórias e 3 indicações no total
- Soon Yang
- (narração)
- Spokesperson Candidate
- (as Rebecca Pitkin)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesWas first released as a 21 minute short, an episode on the PBS show "Futurestates" in 2012.
- Citações
Gwen 2.0: What's wrong?
Jules: I don't really know why I'm alive.
Gwen 2.0: Doesn't matter. Whatever you do will be wonderful and worthwhile.
Jules: How do you know?
Gwen 2.0: I know because you're kind.
Jules: People say being kind is being weak.
Gwen 2.0: You're alive because of energy, and empathy. Your mother had so much of it inside of her, she needed to get it out. So she made you.
Jules: You're starting to sound like her.
- ConexõesEdited from Futurestates: Advantageous (2012)
The premise is definitely interesting, and there were parts of the film that I really liked. However, the story continually came back to tedious metaphysical themes that bored me. In the end, I realized that the film was about the metaphysical themes, and this left me feeling a bit unfulfilled. I suppose it was even more so about cultural criticism, especially a feminist critique of how society treats female aging and beauty. But it kept coming back again and again to these questions of "why am I here", "what is my purpose", and "is there something insubstantial, such as love, that science can't replicate in a lab"?
Kim plays a woman who must make a life-changing choice. Unemployment is skyrocketing, men are pressuring women to leave the workforce, and older workers are seen as hopelessly out-of-touch with the modern market. In fact, humans themselves are being rapidly replaced, and the only way to secure any kind of hope for your child's future is for them to attend the most prestigious schools. The alternative seems to be child prostitution. Most of this is established in the background; if you don't pay close attention, you'll miss it. Unexplained explosions rock the sterility and eerie quiet of the world, and news reports hint at terrorist uprisings because of a hopeless, jobless populace.
So, when you lose your job, that basically means that you've lost everything. What if your employer offers to give you your job back if you'll let them control who you are? So, our protagonist becomes desperate to avoid forcing her own daughter to make these same kinds of desperate choices. What can she do but accept? The question becomes what price she has paid. As the film mulls this over, I began to lose interest. Normally, it takes very little for me to become heavily involved in a character's plight, but, in this case, I struggled. Maybe it's because I don't have kids. For a parent, maybe this would be a more harrowing tale.
There are many admirable aspects to this film, chief among them a woman-centric tale that feels genuine. In some science fiction films, the female protagonist seems to have been written as a male who then gets a gender-flip to mix things up. Or she's a sexual object for the viewers to ogle. There's nothing wrong with a bit of exploitative science fiction, but it's nice to see something with higher aspirations every once in a while. This certainly has that, but it goes so far as to seem pretentious at times.
Maybe this was simply too far outside of my demographic. On the surface, it's got a lot of themes and ideas that appeal to me, but the focus seems to be diametrically opposed to how I would have done it. Less metaphysics, more world-building. If you're interested in feminist science fiction, however, this is rare example. You should at least give it a chance if you're interested in such things. Perhaps you'll be more intrigued by the themes than I was.
- krachtm
- 13 de ago. de 2015
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
- How long is Advantageous?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- 2Q41:茱兒的禮物
- Locações de filme
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 30 minutos
- Cor