AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,9/10
61 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Contado da perspectiva de Igor, vemos as origens do jovem assistente, sua amizade com o jovem estudante de medicina Viktor Von Frankenstein, e nos tornamos testemunhas de como ele se tornou ... Ler tudoContado da perspectiva de Igor, vemos as origens do jovem assistente, sua amizade com o jovem estudante de medicina Viktor Von Frankenstein, e nos tornamos testemunhas de como ele se tornou o homem e a lenda que conhecemos hoje.Contado da perspectiva de Igor, vemos as origens do jovem assistente, sua amizade com o jovem estudante de medicina Viktor Von Frankenstein, e nos tornamos testemunhas de como ele se tornou o homem e a lenda que conhecemos hoje.
- Prêmios
- 4 vitórias e 1 indicação no total
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe mispronunciation of Frankenstein's name is an allusion to a line from O Jovem Frankenstein (1974).
- Erros de gravaçãoIgor prescribes three ounces of arsenic for Lorelei. The LD50 (lethal dose for 50% of the population) is 13 mg per kg, so the amount recommended by Igor would be about 100 times the LD50.
- Citações
Igor: It's alive.
Victor Von Frankenstein: Isn't that rather obvious?
- Trilhas sonorasUnter Donner und Blitz, Op. 324
Written by Johann Strauss (as Johann Strauss II)
Arranged by Craig Armstrong
Avaliação em destaque
Perhaps the Frankenstein name is indeed cursed, there hasn't been a great Frankenstein based movie in years, even decades. From last year's I, Frankenstein to Van Helsing who only has it as subplot, all have met mediocre fate. Now armed with robust acting power and visual that oozes Victorian era, also a bit or horror and action attached somewhere, another rendition shares the same exact fate; cinematic tediousness.
A slight modification to the narrative is made, just like Sherlock the movie is narrated from the sidekick's perspective, in this case Igor's (Daniel Radcliffe). Aside from that, there's barely anything new that hasn't been done in similar or better fashion. To its credit, it's not utterly terrible in term of presentation, in fact the visual is rather nice. It's quaintly dark and electric version of last decade metropolis, Tesla would approve.
James McAvoy as the titular Viktor really tries hard on establishing the character. Given the stale material, he still manages to squeeze some emotional scenes as well as a good chemistry with Radcliffe in a bromantic kind of way. Andrew Scott from Moriarty fame, now plays the role of Inspector Turpin. He's the polar opposite of Viktor, conservative yet equally clever and ambitious.
Unfortunately, the far too familiar plot fails to produce any thrill, the strong acting prowess ends up rehearsing the same routine of mad scientist's banter. There's screaming, philosophical argument, faux science and slight mental abuse by the two leads. It's a lot of noise of little dramatic effect. Not that the script is bad in any way, it has occasional witty lines although any hint of humor or charm is muffled by the overly melancholy tone.
At some points, the movie tries to dabble in horror, action and even romance subplot. The atmosphere is already primed for thriller, but the shocking abomination is ironically timid and unmemorable. Action consists of a few scenes of slow motions repetition. Despite the production offering distractions, the main story line is very straightforward and streamlined, and sadly also predictable.
For all the star and flair, though they might be mildly amusing, the end product is a medium so lacking of life.
A slight modification to the narrative is made, just like Sherlock the movie is narrated from the sidekick's perspective, in this case Igor's (Daniel Radcliffe). Aside from that, there's barely anything new that hasn't been done in similar or better fashion. To its credit, it's not utterly terrible in term of presentation, in fact the visual is rather nice. It's quaintly dark and electric version of last decade metropolis, Tesla would approve.
James McAvoy as the titular Viktor really tries hard on establishing the character. Given the stale material, he still manages to squeeze some emotional scenes as well as a good chemistry with Radcliffe in a bromantic kind of way. Andrew Scott from Moriarty fame, now plays the role of Inspector Turpin. He's the polar opposite of Viktor, conservative yet equally clever and ambitious.
Unfortunately, the far too familiar plot fails to produce any thrill, the strong acting prowess ends up rehearsing the same routine of mad scientist's banter. There's screaming, philosophical argument, faux science and slight mental abuse by the two leads. It's a lot of noise of little dramatic effect. Not that the script is bad in any way, it has occasional witty lines although any hint of humor or charm is muffled by the overly melancholy tone.
At some points, the movie tries to dabble in horror, action and even romance subplot. The atmosphere is already primed for thriller, but the shocking abomination is ironically timid and unmemorable. Action consists of a few scenes of slow motions repetition. Despite the production offering distractions, the main story line is very straightforward and streamlined, and sadly also predictable.
For all the star and flair, though they might be mildly amusing, the end product is a medium so lacking of life.
- quincytheodore
- 24 de nov. de 2015
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Victor Frankenstein?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 65.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 5.775.076
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 2.469.341
- 29 de nov. de 2015
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 34.227.298
- Tempo de duração1 hora 50 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
What was the official certification given to Victor Frankenstein (2015) in Japan?
Responda