I've seen my fair share of terrible films, most of the time I actually really enjoy them. I thought for some time that Hostel (2005) was the worst film I have ever seen. But good Lord, This movie is an insult to the art of film. To start, I have a huge horror bing with me and my brother, this was somehow on here, I never even added it, so we we're dead confused on what this film is, we discovered that there's a remake trilogy of this film, which I just need to ask why anyone would ever remake this. So watching this I was confused, but when it finished... I was mad! It was a complete insult to movies, especially horror movies. The film felt more like a porno then it did a film, there was too much sex in this film to be classified as a film, or even an NC-17 film. The acting was horrendous, it was the worst acting ever, not a single memorable line, even Manos had memorable lines. The characters were flat, the only thing we knew is that they were all friends and couples, and the old man sucked too. The main villains, the scarecrows, looked so bad it was laughable, like I was laughing harder at this more than a comedy. Then I remembered it was a horror film and got mad. Also why would there be scarecrows in a desert? I know the elderly man said all the wheat got swept away, but like, that is such a terrible explanation, at least the remake took place in a corn field. Also, the characters had nothing, because they were in a desert, no weapons or locations. So the movie became really boring. I had to watch this film at 2x speed because of how slow it was, there was almost no horror in it at all. AT ALL. Also, the quality was horrible, it seemed like it was from the 60s. It was on par with Manos: The Hands of Fate or the Beast of Yucca Flats in quality! The one redeeming thing about this "movie" is the soundtrack, it's okay. All in all if IMDb let you give a 0/10, I would give that. Because this deserves a 0.
