AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,8/10
3,4 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Os terroristas no processo de rapto de uma criança ficam presos numa casa com uma cobra extremamente mortífera.Os terroristas no processo de rapto de uma criança ficam presos numa casa com uma cobra extremamente mortífera.Os terroristas no processo de rapto de uma criança ficam presos numa casa com uma cobra extremamente mortífera.
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesDirector Piers Haggard said in a 2003 interview for 'Fangoria' magazine, "I took over that at very short notice. Tobe Hooper had been directing it and they had stopped for whatever reason. It hadn't been working. I did see some of his stuff and it didn't look particularly good plus he also had some sort of nervous breakdown or something. So anyway they stopped shooting and offered it to me. Unfortunately I had commitments, I had some commercials to shoot. But anyway I took it over with barely ten days of preparation - which shows. It doesn't become my picture, it's a bit inbetween . . . [actor Oliver Reed was] scary at first because he was always testing you all the time. Difficult but not as difficult as Klaus Kinski. Because Oliver [Reed] actually had a sense of humour. I was rather fond of him; he could be tricky but he was quite warm really. He just played games and was rather macho and so on. Klaus Kinski was very cold. The main problem with the film was that the two didn't get on and they fought like cats. Kinski of course is a fabulous film actor and he's good in the part, the part suits him very well. They were both well cast but it was a very unhappy film. I think Klaus was the problem but then Oliver spent half the movie just trying to rub him up, pulling his leg all the way. There were shouting matches because Oliver just wouldn't let up. None of this is about art. All the things that you're trying to concentrate on tend to slip. So it was not a happy period."
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen Dr. Stowe is told to get up by Kinski, she anticipates the terrorist's action by grabbing the scarf before Kinski wraps her hand in it.
- Citações
Commander William Bulloch: Look, could you tell me just how dangerous very dangerous is?
Dr. Marion Stowe: The most dangerous snake in the whole world, that dangerous.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe Producers wish to extend their thanks to David Ball, overseer of reptiles at London Zoo, without whose skill and courage in the handling of the deadly Black Mamba, this film could not have been made.
- ConexõesFeatured in Sneak Previews: Personal Best/The Border/Venom/Zoot Suit (1982)
Avaliação em destaque
In 1981, Oliver Reed was in a tough situation. His days of drinking to excess and playing games with his mates from the pub had taken a heavy toll on his purse strings. Moreover, the upkeep on his palatial manor house Broome Hall practically crippled him financially. He was forced to choose film roles that, frankly speaking, were beneath him. It is somewhat disheartening that, by 1983, he had starred in two hammy films about killer snakes, William Fruet's 1983 offering 'Spasms,' and 1981's 'Venom.'
'Venom', directed by Piers Haggard, pairs Reed with the ever-eccentric Klaus Kinski, as a pair of bungling kidnappers targeting the grandson of a hotel magnate. They successfully snatch the child, holding him hostage in his home, but their plans slither into chaos. Unbeknownst to the criminals, the boy inadvertently brought a Black Mamba with him, which escapes. As the situation deteriorates, the police surround the house, while the Mamba, lurking in the ventilation system, stalks his prey; fangs poised to strike.
A schlocky flick, it makes for a highly entertaining watch- for all the wrong reasons. Haggard fails completely to generate tension. Like a drunk on a tightrope, he struggles to balance the thriller and horror elements. The film is neither suspenseful nor tense, and the threat of the snake never feels more menacing than a misplaced garden hose. The dialogue is stilted and unnatural, while the narrative is as predictable as the setting sun. Moreover, the police procedural elements are dull and cliched, while the interplay between the kidnappers and their quarry seems ripped from an 'Idiot's Guide To Storytelling'.
It is a ridiculous film, the appeal of which comes from the general incompetence of Haggard's direction, the tacky snake POV shots and the over-the-top performances from the cast. The cinematography from director of photography Gilbert Taylor- who did impactful work on numerous films, from Roman Polanski's 'Repulsion' to Richard Donner's 'The Omen'- is nothing to write home about. His shots lack visual flair or creativity, while the lighting is flat, and his compositions conventional.
Michael Kamen's score is similarly uninspired, while the editing is frequently choppy and disjointed. However, while the aforementioned snake POV shots- which were also prominently featured in 'Spasms'- are tacky, adding to the film's unintended campness, the fact that a real Mamba was used in certain sequences is commendable and effective.
There is an undeniable charm to the film's absolute absurdity. It's sheer, silly fun, bolstered by the central performances from Reed and Kinski. Reed, a maestro of brooding, silent thuggery, is terrific. He embraces the over-the-top nature of the film with gusto, yet plays the material utterly straight, delivering his lines as if he's performing Shakespeare. His commitment to the role is so earnest that you can't help but be captivated.
Kinski, probably the most temperamental actor to have ever graced the screen, seems to be in an intensity contest with Reed. To paraphrase Spinal Tap's Nigel Tufnel, he turns it way past eleven. Watching Kinski is like watching a live wire sparking dangerously close to an open gas line- rivetingly unpredictable. He is so over-the-top, he's practically orbiting Mars. Apparently, he and Reed did not get along during filming (what a surprise, Kinski not getting along with someone); explaining why the tension between them feels so genuine. Their eccentric duel of egos adds unique, unintentional comedy to the film.
Susan George also has a small role as their accomplice Lousie, seeming bewildered as to why she's in a snake-based chiller. Sterling Hayden, as the hotel magnate, looks like he's wandered onto the set by accident, and acts like it too. Sarah Miles, as a snake expert, plays the material with a hilarious seriousness, while Nicol Williamson, as the main cop, phones it in completely; though is such a fine actor, he actually impresses.
In conclusion, Piers Haggard's 'Venom' offers a glimpse into Oliver Reed's latter career, marked by financial desperation and a willingness to take on any role. As a horror and a thriller, it fails completely, though as an unintentional comedy, it works wonders. The over-acting from Reed and Kinski is a constant delight, while the Black Mamba POV shots are always good for a laugh. Although the narrative, dialogue and cinematography doesn't impress, it's still a fun film worth watching. In short, though 'Venom' might not slither to greatness, it does have a bit of unintentionally comedic bite.
'Venom', directed by Piers Haggard, pairs Reed with the ever-eccentric Klaus Kinski, as a pair of bungling kidnappers targeting the grandson of a hotel magnate. They successfully snatch the child, holding him hostage in his home, but their plans slither into chaos. Unbeknownst to the criminals, the boy inadvertently brought a Black Mamba with him, which escapes. As the situation deteriorates, the police surround the house, while the Mamba, lurking in the ventilation system, stalks his prey; fangs poised to strike.
A schlocky flick, it makes for a highly entertaining watch- for all the wrong reasons. Haggard fails completely to generate tension. Like a drunk on a tightrope, he struggles to balance the thriller and horror elements. The film is neither suspenseful nor tense, and the threat of the snake never feels more menacing than a misplaced garden hose. The dialogue is stilted and unnatural, while the narrative is as predictable as the setting sun. Moreover, the police procedural elements are dull and cliched, while the interplay between the kidnappers and their quarry seems ripped from an 'Idiot's Guide To Storytelling'.
It is a ridiculous film, the appeal of which comes from the general incompetence of Haggard's direction, the tacky snake POV shots and the over-the-top performances from the cast. The cinematography from director of photography Gilbert Taylor- who did impactful work on numerous films, from Roman Polanski's 'Repulsion' to Richard Donner's 'The Omen'- is nothing to write home about. His shots lack visual flair or creativity, while the lighting is flat, and his compositions conventional.
Michael Kamen's score is similarly uninspired, while the editing is frequently choppy and disjointed. However, while the aforementioned snake POV shots- which were also prominently featured in 'Spasms'- are tacky, adding to the film's unintended campness, the fact that a real Mamba was used in certain sequences is commendable and effective.
There is an undeniable charm to the film's absolute absurdity. It's sheer, silly fun, bolstered by the central performances from Reed and Kinski. Reed, a maestro of brooding, silent thuggery, is terrific. He embraces the over-the-top nature of the film with gusto, yet plays the material utterly straight, delivering his lines as if he's performing Shakespeare. His commitment to the role is so earnest that you can't help but be captivated.
Kinski, probably the most temperamental actor to have ever graced the screen, seems to be in an intensity contest with Reed. To paraphrase Spinal Tap's Nigel Tufnel, he turns it way past eleven. Watching Kinski is like watching a live wire sparking dangerously close to an open gas line- rivetingly unpredictable. He is so over-the-top, he's practically orbiting Mars. Apparently, he and Reed did not get along during filming (what a surprise, Kinski not getting along with someone); explaining why the tension between them feels so genuine. Their eccentric duel of egos adds unique, unintentional comedy to the film.
Susan George also has a small role as their accomplice Lousie, seeming bewildered as to why she's in a snake-based chiller. Sterling Hayden, as the hotel magnate, looks like he's wandered onto the set by accident, and acts like it too. Sarah Miles, as a snake expert, plays the material with a hilarious seriousness, while Nicol Williamson, as the main cop, phones it in completely; though is such a fine actor, he actually impresses.
In conclusion, Piers Haggard's 'Venom' offers a glimpse into Oliver Reed's latter career, marked by financial desperation and a willingness to take on any role. As a horror and a thriller, it fails completely, though as an unintentional comedy, it works wonders. The over-acting from Reed and Kinski is a constant delight, while the Black Mamba POV shots are always good for a laugh. Although the narrative, dialogue and cinematography doesn't impress, it's still a fun film worth watching. In short, though 'Venom' might not slither to greatness, it does have a bit of unintentionally comedic bite.
- reelreviewsandrecommendations
- 20 de out. de 2024
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Venom?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 5.229.643
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 5.229.643
- Tempo de duração1 hora 33 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente