Uma apaixonada história de amor ambientada em um contexto de liberdade sexual, vagamente baseada na relação entre os autores do século XIX Pierre Louÿs e Marie de Régnier.Uma apaixonada história de amor ambientada em um contexto de liberdade sexual, vagamente baseada na relação entre os autores do século XIX Pierre Louÿs e Marie de Régnier.Uma apaixonada história de amor ambientada em um contexto de liberdade sexual, vagamente baseada na relação entre os autores do século XIX Pierre Louÿs e Marie de Régnier.
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe music played during the presentation scene of Zohra Ben Brahim is a fragment of the "Épigraphes antiques," a piano (four hands) piece reworking of the "Chansons de Bilitis" (1900/1901), that Claude Debussy wrote for a chamber ensemble to accompany the recitation of the Zohra-inspired poems by Pierre Louÿs in 1900/1901. These pieces were composed, in any case, a few years after the scene depicted, but the connection is totally adequate.
- Citações
Marie de Heredia: Don't you always need several women? I love you enough to share you. Do you hear me? Who will you love deep down? Marie? Louise? Or the creature of your dreams we form?
- Trilhas sonorasSix Épigraphes antiques, pour piano: no. 1 Pour invoquer Pan, dieu du vent d'été, no. 4 Pour la danseuse aux crotales, no. 5 Pour l'égyptienne
Written by Claude Debussy
Performed by Guilhem Fabre
Avaliação em destaque
I only watched curiosa because Noémie Merlant from 'portrait of a lady on fire' is the lead actress. I thought she was brilliant in Céline Sciamma's film, but she is not good here. All of the acting was actually pretty laughable, everyone was trying way too hard and the performances ended up unintentionally funny. Especially Niels Schneider, he gives one of the worst performances I've seen in a while.
There is a lot fundamentally wrong with this film, but there were some things I did like about it. The cinematography was interesting and the shot composition isn't bad either. The use of reflections were pretty good, I love reflections being used to create interesting shots, not sure why but I do. Now onto the abundance of bad stuff.
The single worst element of curiosa is the screenplay. The dialogue is cringeworthy and everything that drives the plot forward just happens because the script says that it has to. There are so many conveniences as a result of extremely lazy writing.
So I love music, it's a huge part of my life, and I'd say I know quite a lot about it. The music in this film is some of the worst, ever. It doesn't fit the time period, and it doesn't fit any of the scenes that it's used in. It's also not composed well at all, it sounds awful.
Another issue I have with the writing is how the characters are written. None of the characters are relatable or likeable, again none of them were performed well, and they were so boring to watch. This whole film was one of the most boring experiences I've had in a long, long time.
Curiosa is not as interesting or deep as it thinks it is. It comes off so pretentious and as far as themes go, there's practically nothing. The only thing I can think of is that it tries to make a statement on male privilege. But the message is presented so poorly that it comes off as if the filmmakers believe that men are superior to women. I find this really interesting because Lou Jeunet, the co-writer and director of this film is a female. The presentation of this film let it down so much, not like the story was compelling anyway. I watched this a day ago and I'm ready forgetting what the story is, it's so boring and stupid.
There is a lot fundamentally wrong with this film, but there were some things I did like about it. The cinematography was interesting and the shot composition isn't bad either. The use of reflections were pretty good, I love reflections being used to create interesting shots, not sure why but I do. Now onto the abundance of bad stuff.
The single worst element of curiosa is the screenplay. The dialogue is cringeworthy and everything that drives the plot forward just happens because the script says that it has to. There are so many conveniences as a result of extremely lazy writing.
So I love music, it's a huge part of my life, and I'd say I know quite a lot about it. The music in this film is some of the worst, ever. It doesn't fit the time period, and it doesn't fit any of the scenes that it's used in. It's also not composed well at all, it sounds awful.
Another issue I have with the writing is how the characters are written. None of the characters are relatable or likeable, again none of them were performed well, and they were so boring to watch. This whole film was one of the most boring experiences I've had in a long, long time.
Curiosa is not as interesting or deep as it thinks it is. It comes off so pretentious and as far as themes go, there's practically nothing. The only thing I can think of is that it tries to make a statement on male privilege. But the message is presented so poorly that it comes off as if the filmmakers believe that men are superior to women. I find this really interesting because Lou Jeunet, the co-writer and director of this film is a female. The presentation of this film let it down so much, not like the story was compelling anyway. I watched this a day ago and I'm ready forgetting what the story is, it's so boring and stupid.
- noahgibbobaker
- 27 de nov. de 2020
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Curiosa?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Полуничка
- Locações de filme
- 11 Cité de Trévise, Paris 9, Paris, França(exteriors: Pierre Louys' bachelor flat)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 114.949
- Tempo de duração1 hora 47 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente