Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaWhen matchmaker Lucy Marks meets businessman Finn Grayson she immediately feels a spark, but when he turns up at her office as her newest client, things get complicated.When matchmaker Lucy Marks meets businessman Finn Grayson she immediately feels a spark, but when he turns up at her office as her newest client, things get complicated.When matchmaker Lucy Marks meets businessman Finn Grayson she immediately feels a spark, but when he turns up at her office as her newest client, things get complicated.
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- Citazioni
[last lines]
Finn Grayson: You know, for a not-date, I think this is pretty great.
Lucy Marks: Best not-date I've ever had.
- Colonne sonoreHaven't Met You Yet
Written by Michael Buble, Alan Chang, and Amy Foster-Gillies
Performed by Michael Buble
Recensione in evidenza
I love Merritt Patterson and I have since I saw her in her first Hallmark Christmas movie. At this point, she is also one of the few really good actresses for either Hallmark or Great American Family that is still young enough to do a "first love" romance. She has a presence on screen. So it is painful to me to give this move less than a glowing review, but for reasons I will explain, it wasn't because of her.
The movie is dominated by a theme and a tone. The theme is ethics. The tone is awkwardness. The former leads to the latter.
Ethics really dominates the movie. It is mentioned often and when not explicitly mentioned it shows up in the relationships through body language and fitful speech. A lot of stuttering or fitful speech. I think that Patterson and Joshua Sasse could have had chemistry, but they had to play so much of the movie with the awkward tension between them that it was hard to see chemistry.
As to ethics, normally the idea of the matchmaker dating a client wouldn't bother me. But the specific situation here made it a problem. It led to deception between Lucy and Molly, Finn and Molly, and to a certain extent between Finn and Lucy. Trust is important in a general sense for each of those relationships. Certainly, Molly needs to be able to trust Lucy due to the dynamic of client and matchmaker. Trust is also important for any dating relationship.
The acting was mostly good. The dialogue had some good moments but was mostly average. Like so many movies on this network, the background music is not background enough. It is noticeable at times.
The story was a big problem. I've already explained a few reasons. Also, this movie reminds me of another on a rival network not long ago but I don't remember the name or the stars. The development is very similar. The story lacks any great highs or lows or surprises. It is very predictable from the mini-surprise at the vineyard to the end. One slightly unusual aspect is that the only conflict or tension is obvious almost from the beginning. There isn't really a conflict moment just before the climax.
I think there are a couple of positive stars added to bring my rating up to mediocre just because of Merritt Patterson.
The movie is dominated by a theme and a tone. The theme is ethics. The tone is awkwardness. The former leads to the latter.
Ethics really dominates the movie. It is mentioned often and when not explicitly mentioned it shows up in the relationships through body language and fitful speech. A lot of stuttering or fitful speech. I think that Patterson and Joshua Sasse could have had chemistry, but they had to play so much of the movie with the awkward tension between them that it was hard to see chemistry.
As to ethics, normally the idea of the matchmaker dating a client wouldn't bother me. But the specific situation here made it a problem. It led to deception between Lucy and Molly, Finn and Molly, and to a certain extent between Finn and Lucy. Trust is important in a general sense for each of those relationships. Certainly, Molly needs to be able to trust Lucy due to the dynamic of client and matchmaker. Trust is also important for any dating relationship.
The acting was mostly good. The dialogue had some good moments but was mostly average. Like so many movies on this network, the background music is not background enough. It is noticeable at times.
The story was a big problem. I've already explained a few reasons. Also, this movie reminds me of another on a rival network not long ago but I don't remember the name or the stars. The development is very similar. The story lacks any great highs or lows or surprises. It is very predictable from the mini-surprise at the vineyard to the end. One slightly unusual aspect is that the only conflict or tension is obvious almost from the beginning. There isn't really a conflict moment just before the climax.
I think there are a couple of positive stars added to bring my rating up to mediocre just because of Merritt Patterson.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is One Perfect Match?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 3.717 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 27 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti