I'm reviewing this strictly as the sequel to The Hamiltons, which I did see first.
Ok, my hopes were dashed pretty quickly after witnessing 8 minutes of digital effects, digital blood, and digital fangs. Then the title card came up.
The story of The Thompsons revolves around the same character as in the first movie, and that would be Francis. Only now, he is this assertive, brooding, badass? Talk about a 180. I was assuming this movie would pick up where the last one left off, as the ending to The Hamiltons screamed "there's more coming!" Nope, this one starts off in England, and primarily takes place there, but the family has splintered (er, just hiding out) to different regions of the world.
What follows is a whole bunch of timeline shifting. 2012. How popular was Quentin Tarantino in 2012? I would say he's the master of interweaving timelines. Here, in The Thompsons, it comes off as really unnecessary.
The crux of this movie is intriguing. Francis is sent to England only with a name and a town, to try and track down an ancient vampire clan, and maybe find some place that they can call home. Oh, they're real hospitable. And this is where it gets predictable. Wait, Francis was in a box... Damn you timeline! What is interesting, is that these particular, more powerful, vampires descended directly from the Thompson/Hamilton bloodline. Now, why it was crucial to breed with the Thompson's (weaker) daughter, did not make any sense to me (well, she is real foxy...). There is a good twist at the end, when David shows up in England with their dying youngest.
Do you need to see The Hamiltons first to enjoy this movie? Besides the fact that The Hamiltons is a superior movie, especially with character depth, the answer is absolutely not. Their entire story is rehashed, through a series of flashbacks and voiceovers in The Thompsons. One thing I really enjoy in sequels, are all the "references" that you can only pick up on only by seeing the original. No such luck here.
