VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,4/10
3494
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Ambientato durante la notte di Capodanno del 1999 in un lussuoso hotel svizzero dove le vite di chi ci lavora e i vari ospiti si intrecciano.Ambientato durante la notte di Capodanno del 1999 in un lussuoso hotel svizzero dove le vite di chi ci lavora e i vari ospiti si intrecciano.Ambientato durante la notte di Capodanno del 1999 in un lussuoso hotel svizzero dove le vite di chi ci lavora e i vari ospiti si intrecciano.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 1 candidatura in totale
Aleksandr Petrov
- Russian Guest
- (as Alexander Petrov)
Ema Mur
- Russian Girl
- (as Ema Kovac)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizWhen suggesting to use a bandaid for Bongo's nose, Hansueli suggests he would look like "that actor" in "that movie". He's speaking of Jack Nicholson in Roman Polanski's Chinatown (1974).
- BlooperChampagne, especially a $12,450 bottle of Bollinger 1938 vintage champagne, would never under any circumstances be served at room temperature.
- Citazioni
Arthur William Dallas III: Can I have that blowjob now?
- ConnessioniReferences Chinatown (1974)
- Colonne sonoreMambo No.5 (A Little Bit Of...)
Written by Dámaso Pérez Prado, Lou Bega and Zippy Davids
Performed by Lou Bega
Recensione in evidenza
Realizing that he himself would soon go into oblivion, he probably said his last word to this rotten and two-faced world, in which not a hint of decency and principles remained.
Almost all the characters and their actions are clear who they represent in the real world, although in some places there is a little fog. Quite a funny, superficial grotesque look at what has happened to the world in the last 30 years.
But Polanski's characteristic subtle style is weakly visible here; rather, this is the work of two other Polish screenwriters, as the main "traction" horses; he was on this list rather as a consultant and architect of the general line; he most likely has not had the strength to create everything himself for a long time . Everything is too rough, especially the ending. It does not shock at all, but rather saddens, recalling Polanski's old works.
The subtle, complex acting and skirmishes that you expect from Polanski's films are practically absent here.
Is it worth watching? Against the backdrop of that endless wave of sludge and bad taste, Hollywood certainly, perhaps his last venture in his life, deserves it. The trouble is that he does not present deep thoughts, everything is too superficial. For the sophisticated public, everything quickly becomes boring, but for the inexperienced it is rather pointless.
The sophisticated public on the planet understands perfectly well what the remnants of the former civilization are moving towards quite quickly, but the unsophisticated public is more and more busy with animal survival and has no time for self-reflection and assessment of the situation in the world.
It is clear that this creation will certainly be hated in the USA (and this is mutual from Polanski personally) and quite strongly in Europe. That is why the rating is intentionally low and there are no large number of ratings. The majority of the population has neither critical thinking nor the self-sufficiency of outlook to independently shape their destiny and evaluate what is really happening around them - they are shaped by it, skillfully forcing them to follow the indicated track leading straight to the abyss, like horses rushing in blinkers...
Almost all the characters and their actions are clear who they represent in the real world, although in some places there is a little fog. Quite a funny, superficial grotesque look at what has happened to the world in the last 30 years.
But Polanski's characteristic subtle style is weakly visible here; rather, this is the work of two other Polish screenwriters, as the main "traction" horses; he was on this list rather as a consultant and architect of the general line; he most likely has not had the strength to create everything himself for a long time . Everything is too rough, especially the ending. It does not shock at all, but rather saddens, recalling Polanski's old works.
The subtle, complex acting and skirmishes that you expect from Polanski's films are practically absent here.
Is it worth watching? Against the backdrop of that endless wave of sludge and bad taste, Hollywood certainly, perhaps his last venture in his life, deserves it. The trouble is that he does not present deep thoughts, everything is too superficial. For the sophisticated public, everything quickly becomes boring, but for the inexperienced it is rather pointless.
The sophisticated public on the planet understands perfectly well what the remnants of the former civilization are moving towards quite quickly, but the unsophisticated public is more and more busy with animal survival and has no time for self-reflection and assessment of the situation in the world.
It is clear that this creation will certainly be hated in the USA (and this is mutual from Polanski personally) and quite strongly in Europe. That is why the rating is intentionally low and there are no large number of ratings. The majority of the population has neither critical thinking nor the self-sufficiency of outlook to independently shape their destiny and evaluate what is really happening around them - they are shaped by it, skillfully forcing them to follow the indicated track leading straight to the abyss, like horses rushing in blinkers...
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Palace?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Палац
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Palace Hotel, Gstaad, Svizzera(main location)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 21.000.000 € (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 972.567 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 40 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti