VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,8/10
47.703
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un agente dell'FBI riprende il suo travestimento da vecchia signora corpulenta.Un agente dell'FBI riprende il suo travestimento da vecchia signora corpulenta.Un agente dell'FBI riprende il suo travestimento da vecchia signora corpulenta.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 5 candidature totali
Chloë Grace Moretz
- Carrie
- (as Chloe Grace Moretz)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizFeature film debut of Zachary Levi.
- BlooperThe Fuller's dog is referred to as Poncho, a male Chihuahua. Yet, when all Carrie's fellow cheerleaders show up to the house to practice their routine, Poncho stands on his hind legs - and it's clearly a female Chihuahua.
- ConnessioniFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Worst Hollywood Directors (2014)
- Colonne sonoreRound for Round
Written by Jasmin Lopez and J.R. Rotem (as Jonathan Rotem)
Performed by Jasmin Lopez
Courtesy of Southside Independent
Recensione in evidenza
If you're looking for an intellectual comedy or even something with some actual substance to it, this is not the movie to go to. It is the type of movie you go to, to turn off your brain and just take in some escapist entertainment. It does the job decently, better than most of the other light comedies out there. But what really surprises is how relatively few stupid moments come throughout the movie. A lesser-quality movie would have gone for the easy jokes about dorky white people vs. smooth black people. A lesser flick would have had some of the characters be less perceptive and observant than they actually ended up turning out to be. Poorer-quality fare would have turned this movie into something approaching blaxploitation, where all parties involved ended up humiliated by the experience.
This didn't do any of the aforementioned. Certain characters who could have been written as dumber were actually written as credibly perceptive. Certain scenarios that could have been played out as ridiculous ended up being plausible. There was less of a black/white good vs. evil conundrum going on in this movie, and the suspense involved actually seemed worth it instead of just being suspense for suspense's sake. I don't think there was one moment in the whole film where I was rolling my eyes going, "OH COME ON," the way I was throughout the last film I was obliged to go see, this year's remake of Last Holiday.
Had the premise been more original, had the comedy been more sharply written, more intelligent, I would have been inclined to give this comedy ten stars. It really is one of the better commercial movies to be released in Hollywood over the last five years. It even manages to be better than its predecessor. However, the comedy was actually quite dull, pedestrian, uninvolved, and unintellectual, which means it earns six stars out of ten. Just barely passable, but a heck of a lot better than its contemporaries.
This didn't do any of the aforementioned. Certain characters who could have been written as dumber were actually written as credibly perceptive. Certain scenarios that could have been played out as ridiculous ended up being plausible. There was less of a black/white good vs. evil conundrum going on in this movie, and the suspense involved actually seemed worth it instead of just being suspense for suspense's sake. I don't think there was one moment in the whole film where I was rolling my eyes going, "OH COME ON," the way I was throughout the last film I was obliged to go see, this year's remake of Last Holiday.
Had the premise been more original, had the comedy been more sharply written, more intelligent, I would have been inclined to give this comedy ten stars. It really is one of the better commercial movies to be released in Hollywood over the last five years. It even manages to be better than its predecessor. However, the comedy was actually quite dull, pedestrian, uninvolved, and unintellectual, which means it earns six stars out of ten. Just barely passable, but a heck of a lot better than its contemporaries.
- ladyinterference
- 16 mar 2006
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Big Momma's House 2?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Big Momma's House 2
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Costa Mesa, California, Stati Uniti(Deloitte & Touche Building)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 40.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 70.165.972 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 27.736.056 USD
- 29 gen 2006
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 141.522.961 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 39 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti