Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaTrouble erupts when a happily married couple bring in a third party to spice things up.Trouble erupts when a happily married couple bring in a third party to spice things up.Trouble erupts when a happily married couple bring in a third party to spice things up.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria in totale
Thomas Jefferson Byrd
- Thomas
- (as Thom Byrd)
Gregory W. Anderson
- Det. Anderson
- (as Gregory Anderson)
Roxanne Ferguson
- Bar Lesbian
- (as Heather Roxanne Ferguson)
Dionne Gipson
- Lesbian
- (as a different name)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizDionne Gipson's debut.
- BlooperWhen Jermaine calls Jade looking for Jasmine, Jade says "I don't know why you're calling me at 5:99 in the morning". There is no such time as 5:99.
- Versioni alternativeSome explicit sexuality was cut from the film to earn an MPAA rating of "R" instead of the original "NC-17".
- ConnessioniFollowed by Trois 2 - Una relazione ambigua (2002)
Recensione in evidenza
Gretchen Palmer does not deserve this - although some may feel different seeing her try to act in this. I do believe I have seen her being way better than here - no pun intended. Must be a combination of script and set conditions I imagine.
Sometimes you also have to take on roles, you do not really believe in - just to pay the rent. Might have been one of those situations. Interestingly enough, this seems to have been succesful enough to spur 2 sequels. Both showing way more skin than this does. Which I didn't mind by the way - it is the acting and the dialog that is so cringeworthy, that it almost hurts physically.
So never mind the erotic scenes where all the "best" parts are covered. "Clothed" scenes can be quite erotic too - and I would argue the main love scene is just that. The scene that seemingly gets the whole thing going on. The whole thing that could have been avoided, if ... but the last twist almost kind of saves the whole movie. Still even that never really reaches any height it imagines it does.
Sometimes you also have to take on roles, you do not really believe in - just to pay the rent. Might have been one of those situations. Interestingly enough, this seems to have been succesful enough to spur 2 sequels. Both showing way more skin than this does. Which I didn't mind by the way - it is the acting and the dialog that is so cringeworthy, that it almost hurts physically.
So never mind the erotic scenes where all the "best" parts are covered. "Clothed" scenes can be quite erotic too - and I would argue the main love scene is just that. The scene that seemingly gets the whole thing going on. The whole thing that could have been avoided, if ... but the last twist almost kind of saves the whole movie. Still even that never really reaches any height it imagines it does.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Trois?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Threesome
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 200.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 1.161.843 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 200.815 USD
- 13 feb 2000
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 1.161.843 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 33 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti