Sei giovani attrici che fanno un provino per un ruolo cinematografico in una villa remota vengono prese di mira da un misterioso assassino mascherato.Sei giovani attrici che fanno un provino per un ruolo cinematografico in una villa remota vengono prese di mira da un misterioso assassino mascherato.Sei giovani attrici che fanno un provino per un ruolo cinematografico in una villa remota vengono prese di mira da un misterioso assassino mascherato.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Tara DeMillo
- (as Sandra Warren)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe opening credits give John Vernon's fictional director Jonathan Stryker credit as the director. Director Richard Ciupka decided not to place his name on the credits.
- BlooperIn one of the establishing shots of Stryker's house, a second floor window can be seen broken and a figure of a body lying on the ground below. This is from the aftermath of Stryker and Brooke's murder, but this happens much later in the film.
- Citazioni
Jonathan Stryker: What makes you think you're right for Audra?
Patti O'Connor: I'm as right as anybody else you've got here. I mean, goddammit! You haven't spent five minutes with me and now you're telling me I'm wrong for the part. Why? Because I haven't got a staple to my navel like that centerfold? Because I wouldn't pirouette into bed with you and skate on your face? I mean, what the hell are you looking for anyway and what do you want from me? I mean, who the fuck is Audra anyway?
[Jonathan stays silent]
Patti O'Connor: Are you enjoying yourself?
Jonathan Stryker: I'm enjoying a little bit of Audra.
[walks away]
Patti O'Connor: You bastard.
- Curiosità sui creditiThe credits are divided into acts like a play, due to the movie being centered around acting and scripts.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Ciupka: A Filmmaker in Transition (1983)
- Colonne sonoreSave my Soul
Courtesy of Burton Cummings & Shillelagh Music Co.
One has to wonder why a film like "Curtains" has been so longly ignored except among cult horror purists— fans have ached for a proper DVD release of the film, and it certainly deserves at least that. It is not a great film, but it is great if we're measuring it on a slasher scale.
Though it is most definitely a slasher movie, there are shades of class here that set it apart from the sleazier body count films of the era, and the performances are part of this, but also a great deal of attention to cinematography and the establishment of mood. The entire film has a dark, somber, weather-drenched atmosphere that is immediately off-putting, and things become progressively macabre after the girls reach the remote mansion.
It's an interesting and unusual setup, and there is a lot of subtext about filmmaking and performance that is played up with some minor intelligence. While the establishment of mood is fantastic here, and the setting is delectably spooky, there is a sense of disconnectedness in the film on a tonal level. Given the film's purportedly lengthy, troubled production, this makes sense, but it does create a feeling of the film not really being the sum of its parts— at least not the sum that it could have been. That said, the film is nevertheless successful at maintaining an eeriness.
The performances here are great, with John Eggar as the cold and calculated director, and Samantha Eggar as his glamorous "has been" muse. These two are the veterans of the film, both literally and narratively. Linda Thorson, Lynne Griffin (of "Black Christmas"), and Lesleh Donaldson ("Funeral Home") are welcome additions to the younger actresses, and give respectable performances, especially Griffin.
Overall, "Curtains" excels at being a moody and moderately classy slasher film. There are enough death scenes to appease the gore crowd, and enough suspense and mood to engage the more narratively-inclined audience, and, while the film's disjointed production seeps into the final product, the parts are effective enough to take precedence over the sum. 8/10.
- drownsoda90
- 4 nov 2006
- Permalink
I più visti
- How long is Curtains?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 3.700.000 CA$ (previsto)