VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,4/10
14.995
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una coppia nel sud della Francia percorre in modo non sequenziale le strade dell'infedeltà nel loro travagliato matrimonio decennale.Una coppia nel sud della Francia percorre in modo non sequenziale le strade dell'infedeltà nel loro travagliato matrimonio decennale.Una coppia nel sud della Francia percorre in modo non sequenziale le strade dell'infedeltà nel loro travagliato matrimonio decennale.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Candidato a 1 Oscar
- 3 vittorie e 7 candidature totali
Georges Descrières
- David
- (as Georges Descrieres)
Irène Hilda
- Yvonne de Florac
- (as Irene Hilda)
Karyn Balm
- Simone
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Yves Barsacq
- Police Inspector
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Kathy Chelimsky
- Caroline Wallace
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Roger Dann
- Gilbert, 'Comte de Florac'
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Olga Georges-Picot
- Joanna's Touring Friend
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Clarissa Hillel
- Joanna's Touring Friend
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizHenry Mancini said that although the scoring was the most difficult in his career, the music he composed for this movie was always his favorite.
- BlooperWhile riding in a limousine, Joanna's hairdo is first shown with bangs, then without bangs, and then with bangs again.
- Citazioni
Mark Wallace: Do you know what marriage is?
Joanna Wallace: Hmm, you tell me, and see if we're thinking of the same thing.
Mark Wallace: Marriage is when the woman tells the man to take off his pajamas... and it's because, she wants to send them to the laundry.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Film Review: Peter Cook, Dudley Moore & Stanley Donen (1967)
Recensione in evidenza
I am only 20 years old and by no means close to marriage, but from what people tell me, marriage is a lot like what is portrayed on screen in Two For The Road. It details the relationship between a husband and wife who basically have a love hate relationship. It's not sugarcoated at all. Audrey Hepburn and Albert Finney are great but really do you expect anything different? Hepburn is really the only reason I know of this movie and I'm glad that I watched it. Most of the old movies always have the typical romantic feel to them. There are bumps in the road but really you know watching that in the end they will end up together. With this film it's unclear what the ending will be and that makes for a much more fun ride along the way.
You can tell from the very opening scene that the two leads despise each other, but then in the next segment they hadn't met. For me at first it was a bit jarring not knowing this film was going to take a different approach. It's told in the non linear and jumps around every 10 minutes or so. It's a very effective approach but there were times where I thought it was choppy. For this time of filmmaking it must have been extremely experimental doing a movie this way.
There are times where Finney and Hepburn are unlikeable but even then it's hard not to root for this couple to somehow resolve their long term marriage. It seems that in order to have a successful marriage you have to be willing to make some big sacrifices and ultimately that's what it comes down to. I really liked the scenes in the middle of their relationship where you can start to see the flaws, but at the same time you realize the young love that is blossoming. By the way can Audrey Hepburn be any more beautiful? She is around 40 years old in this movie and looks better than ever. It must be that long hair look...
Not only is it a fun film to watch but it's a realistic one. It may not be a true story but it seems to depict a real marriage give many glimpses at how people deal with each other for several years, and in the end if they can resolve or destroy their marriage.
8.7/10
You can tell from the very opening scene that the two leads despise each other, but then in the next segment they hadn't met. For me at first it was a bit jarring not knowing this film was going to take a different approach. It's told in the non linear and jumps around every 10 minutes or so. It's a very effective approach but there were times where I thought it was choppy. For this time of filmmaking it must have been extremely experimental doing a movie this way.
There are times where Finney and Hepburn are unlikeable but even then it's hard not to root for this couple to somehow resolve their long term marriage. It seems that in order to have a successful marriage you have to be willing to make some big sacrifices and ultimately that's what it comes down to. I really liked the scenes in the middle of their relationship where you can start to see the flaws, but at the same time you realize the young love that is blossoming. By the way can Audrey Hepburn be any more beautiful? She is around 40 years old in this movie and looks better than ever. It must be that long hair look...
Not only is it a fun film to watch but it's a realistic one. It may not be a true story but it seems to depict a real marriage give many glimpses at how people deal with each other for several years, and in the end if they can resolve or destroy their marriage.
8.7/10
- ThomasDrufke
- 6 mag 2014
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Two for the Road?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 4.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 17.808 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 51 minuti
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Due per la strada (1967) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi