VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,5/10
4549
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Nel territorio di Apache, un uomo cerca l'assassino della moglie indiana e una casalinga abbandona il marito per raggiungere la tribù del suo amante Apache.Nel territorio di Apache, un uomo cerca l'assassino della moglie indiana e una casalinga abbandona il marito per raggiungere la tribù del suo amante Apache.Nel territorio di Apache, un uomo cerca l'assassino della moglie indiana e una casalinga abbandona il marito per raggiungere la tribù del suo amante Apache.
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Ralph Nelson
- Col. Foster
- (as Alf Elson)
Armand Alzamora
- Ramirez
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Ralph Bahnsen
- Trooper Nyles
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Timothy Carey
- Deputy Clem
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Jeff Cooper
- Trooper Casey
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Kevin Coughlin
- Norton
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Robert Crawford Jr.
- Trooper Swenson - Bugler
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizJames Garner's first western since leaving Maverick (1957) and Sidney Poitier's first theatrical western.
- BlooperAs Willard hands his wife a gun, he says there are two cartridges in gun. However, it can be seen that all six chambers are loaded.
Bullet noses can be seen in the chambers on the left side of the cylinder but a minute or so later, the right side is on camera and shows 3 empty chambers.
- Citazioni
Ellen Grange: They all think that any decent woman would prefer to die than live as an Apache squaw. Maybe they're right.
Jess Remsberg: Death comes soon enough. Anyone who hurries it is a damn fool.
- Curiosità sui creditiThe United Artists logo is sliced off the screen with a bloody Calvary Saber, slicing an "X" across the screen, revealing the opening scene. At the end, the same saber slices the live picture away, as (sort of) a fade out.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Rubare alla mafia è un suicidio (1972)
Recensione in evidenza
What terrific production values—that trek across a hellishly barren Utah desert had me off the couch, running for a water pitcher. And catch all those cavalrymen, Indians, and wild horses, enough for at least ten more westerns. Then there's the great James Garner to headline, along with a spiffy Sidney Poitier. So, why isn't this a top-notch horse opera, given such promising prospects.
For one thing, there's about ten sub-plots too many. Heck, just the ordeal across the desert should be enough for most westerns without over-crowding the storyline. Sure, the script is making a good point about racism with Ellen's half-Indian baby. But do we need the soap opera sub-plot with husband Dennis Weaver that's mainly a distraction. Then there's Poitier showing it wasn't just white guys who won the west. And, of course, the screenplay has to carve out a large enough role for a second headliner. Add to that Garner's search for whoever scalped his wife that is sort of tacked on at the end, and we've got enough plot material for three more features.
Sure, the movie's heart is in the right place. But messages are one thing, while merging them into a fluid narrative is another, and here the sub-plots add to the general problem of too much storyline clutter. The root of the problem, I expect, was hiring too many name stars, even if Travers and Andersson are known mainly to foreign audiences. Speaking of the cast, Garner's unusual skills are largely wasted in a role any number of imposing presences like Clint Walker could have easily handled.
And I never thought it would happen, but by about the twentieth skirmish across the desert, I actually got a little bored with all the repetitive stunts and endless shooting. 'More', it seems, is not always better, and I suspect the lesson is there can be too much action even in an action movie.
Anyway, I don't want to simply dismiss the movie because of its excesses since there are also a number of good touches (Chata gets some respect as a leader of his people, even though we see him as cruel), along with the generous production values. I'm just sorry the movie doesn't succeed better given its praiseworthy side.
For one thing, there's about ten sub-plots too many. Heck, just the ordeal across the desert should be enough for most westerns without over-crowding the storyline. Sure, the script is making a good point about racism with Ellen's half-Indian baby. But do we need the soap opera sub-plot with husband Dennis Weaver that's mainly a distraction. Then there's Poitier showing it wasn't just white guys who won the west. And, of course, the screenplay has to carve out a large enough role for a second headliner. Add to that Garner's search for whoever scalped his wife that is sort of tacked on at the end, and we've got enough plot material for three more features.
Sure, the movie's heart is in the right place. But messages are one thing, while merging them into a fluid narrative is another, and here the sub-plots add to the general problem of too much storyline clutter. The root of the problem, I expect, was hiring too many name stars, even if Travers and Andersson are known mainly to foreign audiences. Speaking of the cast, Garner's unusual skills are largely wasted in a role any number of imposing presences like Clint Walker could have easily handled.
And I never thought it would happen, but by about the twentieth skirmish across the desert, I actually got a little bored with all the repetitive stunts and endless shooting. 'More', it seems, is not always better, and I suspect the lesson is there can be too much action even in an action movie.
Anyway, I don't want to simply dismiss the movie because of its excesses since there are also a number of good touches (Chata gets some respect as a leader of his people, even though we see him as cruel), along with the generous production values. I'm just sorry the movie doesn't succeed better given its praiseworthy side.
- dougdoepke
- 17 feb 2012
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Duel at Diablo?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 43 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Duello a El Diablo (1966) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi