In un processo per omicidio, l'imputato afferma di aver subito una follia temporanea dopo che la vittima ha violentato sua moglie. Qual è la verità? Arriverà a vincere il suo caso?In un processo per omicidio, l'imputato afferma di aver subito una follia temporanea dopo che la vittima ha violentato sua moglie. Qual è la verità? Arriverà a vincere il suo caso?In un processo per omicidio, l'imputato afferma di aver subito una follia temporanea dopo che la vittima ha violentato sua moglie. Qual è la verità? Arriverà a vincere il suo caso?
- Candidato a 7 Oscar
- 10 vittorie e 18 candidature totali
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizPart of the controversy surrounding this movie was because it included use of the words "bitch", "contraceptive", "panties", "penetration", "rape", "slut", and "sperm".
- BlooperJames Stewart goes to negotiate with the DA at the courthouse. Sign over the DA's door is misspelled "Proseguting attorney". Actually this is not true. It's possible to compare the c with the g at the end of the word, and you can see the g has a descending stroke. It's just a foible of the font.
- Citazioni
Paul Biegler: As a lawyer, I've had to learn that people aren't just good or just bad. People are many things.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Portrait of an Actor (1971)
Recensione in evidenza
Well filmed, beautifully acted, and painstakingly directed, this film deserves the highest praise.
James Stewart brings his customary stammering, quirky charm to a role that could have easily become overwhelmingly serious. Lee Remick is seen establishing her early image as the somehow fragile, undeniably seductive pawn (see also "A Face in The Crowd"), while Gazzara wavers intensely somewhere between heartless murderer and protective husband. The supporting cast is strong, creating a human backdrop for the senior players, keeping the story in the real world, effectively preventing this from becoming an exercise in legal theory.
This film is noteworthy for a myriad of reasons, but most specifically because it addresses the still controversial issue of acquaintance rape, and presents us with a victim of questionable morals. At the same time our murder victim is seen as a monster, then a friend and father. There really are no heroes here, no noble defenders, no pristine heroines, no completely innocent bystanders...both sides take their turns pointing fingers, each claiming that the other only got what they deserved.
We are forced to re-evaluate our thoughts on what constitutes justifiable homicide--the unwritten law that Manion speaks of in the film versus the law as written that Biegler must now interpret. This manipulation of intended meaning sets a somewhat tragic precedent evident in the legal system we work within today.
This film is highly entertaining, and excellent for discussion. Watch it with some of your more philosophical friends.
James Stewart brings his customary stammering, quirky charm to a role that could have easily become overwhelmingly serious. Lee Remick is seen establishing her early image as the somehow fragile, undeniably seductive pawn (see also "A Face in The Crowd"), while Gazzara wavers intensely somewhere between heartless murderer and protective husband. The supporting cast is strong, creating a human backdrop for the senior players, keeping the story in the real world, effectively preventing this from becoming an exercise in legal theory.
This film is noteworthy for a myriad of reasons, but most specifically because it addresses the still controversial issue of acquaintance rape, and presents us with a victim of questionable morals. At the same time our murder victim is seen as a monster, then a friend and father. There really are no heroes here, no noble defenders, no pristine heroines, no completely innocent bystanders...both sides take their turns pointing fingers, each claiming that the other only got what they deserved.
We are forced to re-evaluate our thoughts on what constitutes justifiable homicide--the unwritten law that Manion speaks of in the film versus the law as written that Biegler must now interpret. This manipulation of intended meaning sets a somewhat tragic precedent evident in the legal system we work within today.
This film is highly entertaining, and excellent for discussion. Watch it with some of your more philosophical friends.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Anatomía de un asesinato
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Tripoli Bar, Ishpeming, Michigan, Stati Uniti(interiors: Thunder Bay Inn)
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 194 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 41 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What is the Hindi language plot outline for Anatomia di un omicidio (1959)?
Rispondi