VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,7/10
6276
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un atto di danza tra fratelli e sorelle incontra sfide e romanticismo quando viene prenotato a Londra durante il Matrimonio Reale.Un atto di danza tra fratelli e sorelle incontra sfide e romanticismo quando viene prenotato a Londra durante il Matrimonio Reale.Un atto di danza tra fratelli e sorelle incontra sfide e romanticismo quando viene prenotato a Londra durante il Matrimonio Reale.
- Candidato a 1 Oscar
- 1 vittoria e 1 candidatura in totale
Bea Allen
- Dancer in Haiti Number
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Les Baxter
- Specialty in 'What a Lovely Day for a Wedding' Number
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Wilson Benge
- Minor Role
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Margaret Bert
- Ellen's Maid
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Francis Bethencourt
- Charles Gordon
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Lulu Mae Bohrman
- Royal Attendant
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Jack Boyle
- Dancer
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
John Brascia
- Dancer in Haiti Number
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
William Cabanne
- Dick
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Gary Casteel
- Child Singer
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Andre Charisse
- Steward
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Bill Chatham
- Dancer in Haiti Number
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe "You're All the World to Me" dance was accomplished by putting a whole room, with attached camera and harnessed cameraman, inside a 20-foot-diameter rotating "squirrel cage."
- BlooperOn the day of the wedding, many of the British flags in the streets are hung upside down. The wider diagonal white stripe of the Union Flag should always be uppermost next to the top of the flagpole.
- Curiosità sui creditiThe opening credits are displayed on engraved invitation pages.
- Versioni alternativeThere is an Italian DVD edition of this movie, distributed by DNA Srl, entitled "Royal Wedding". The movie was re-edited with the contribution of the film history scholar Riccardo Cusin. This dvd contains the movie with its original aspect ratio and a new version adapted in 1.78:1 anamorphic for 16:9 screens. This version is also available in streaming on some platforms. This DVD also contains another movie with Fred Astaire: "Second Chorus" (1941).
- ConnessioniEdited into Your Afternoon Movie: The Royal Wedding (2022)
Recensione in evidenza
I've only seen two other Fred Astaire vehicles: "Top Hat" and "Swing Time", the more recent of which was made 15 years before this. The improvement is remarkable. At some time perhaps in the 1940s Astaire appears to have been given a charm transplant; in "Royal Wedding", instead of coming across, woodenly, as a bit of a cad, he's a perfectly decent fellow, with all of the human impulses it's easiest to like and intelligence to boot. It's as though he'd been taking lessons from Gene Kelly.
If the earlier dance spectacles are not to be judged too harshly for merely marking time between the breath-taking dance sequences and I concur, they should not be judged too harshly for this how much less should this one be judged harshly, with at least four sequences likely to get applause (all four DID get applause, at the screening I attended): the bit where Astaire "rehearses" when his partner doesn't show up by dancing with and around the gym equipment (again, this is exactly the kind of thing Gene Kelly would do); the scene in which he dances on the wall, then the ceiling, then the other wall, then the ceiling again obviously within a set like the one used in "2001", but Astaire disguises this by finding a different, natural-looking transition from surface to surface each time; the over-the-top "I Left My Hat in Haiti" number; and the superbly performed (well acted and sung as well as well danced) "How Could You Believe Me etc." routine. Any one of these would be reason enough to dust a mediocre film off and watch it at least once.
But this isn't a mediocre film. It's not just that there are four strong numbers and no weak ones; it's that it DOESN'T merely mark time between them. One thing that this has in common with Donen's other films is its desire to entertain at every moment. It's a light film, even a facetious one yet we can feel for it, too. There's nothing contrived or pointless about the complication that threatens to thwart True Love. (Whether or not this really IS true love is of course beside the point.) Tom likes the lifestyle of a bachelor, Ellen wants to preserve her career; both characters are genuinely torn for perfectly legitimate reasons, and in fact, there's no way for them to resolve their difficulties except by simply choosing, which is why the sudden, simultaneous decision to get married to their respective partners at the end doesn't feel forced.
I go to watch films I've never heard of and expect very little from, all the time. Why? Because every once in a while, I strike gold.
If the earlier dance spectacles are not to be judged too harshly for merely marking time between the breath-taking dance sequences and I concur, they should not be judged too harshly for this how much less should this one be judged harshly, with at least four sequences likely to get applause (all four DID get applause, at the screening I attended): the bit where Astaire "rehearses" when his partner doesn't show up by dancing with and around the gym equipment (again, this is exactly the kind of thing Gene Kelly would do); the scene in which he dances on the wall, then the ceiling, then the other wall, then the ceiling again obviously within a set like the one used in "2001", but Astaire disguises this by finding a different, natural-looking transition from surface to surface each time; the over-the-top "I Left My Hat in Haiti" number; and the superbly performed (well acted and sung as well as well danced) "How Could You Believe Me etc." routine. Any one of these would be reason enough to dust a mediocre film off and watch it at least once.
But this isn't a mediocre film. It's not just that there are four strong numbers and no weak ones; it's that it DOESN'T merely mark time between them. One thing that this has in common with Donen's other films is its desire to entertain at every moment. It's a light film, even a facetious one yet we can feel for it, too. There's nothing contrived or pointless about the complication that threatens to thwart True Love. (Whether or not this really IS true love is of course beside the point.) Tom likes the lifestyle of a bachelor, Ellen wants to preserve her career; both characters are genuinely torn for perfectly legitimate reasons, and in fact, there's no way for them to resolve their difficulties except by simply choosing, which is why the sudden, simultaneous decision to get married to their respective partners at the end doesn't feel forced.
I go to watch films I've never heard of and expect very little from, all the time. Why? Because every once in a while, I strike gold.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 1.590.920 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 33 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Sua altezza si sposa (1951) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi