Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA wealthy man relates how gambling had tragic consequences for his family.A wealthy man relates how gambling had tragic consequences for his family.A wealthy man relates how gambling had tragic consequences for his family.
Foto
Wally Albright
- Fred as Young Boy
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Oscar Apfel
- Strickland - Cora's Father
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Barlowe Borland
- Jim - Poker Player
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Jess Cavin
- Barfly
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
John Cowell
- Croupier
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Alec Craig
- Prospector at Card Game
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Lester Dorr
- Dice Player
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Henry Hall
- Jury Foreman
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
John Ince
- Town and Country Club Member
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- BlooperThe narration of the film starts during the us civil war going to several years at the beginning of world war one, Prohibition but the woman's hair style are from 1935.
Recensione in evidenza
"Born to Gamble" is a very low budgeted B-movie from tiny Liberty Pictures, a 'Poverty Row' studio that filmed at the RKO lot at night. Many of the so-called 'Povery Row' studios filmed at night because they didn't actually own studio space but instead rented sound stages at the major studios--filming when the majors sent everyone home for the night. Not surprisingly, cheapness seems to be pretty obvious with this one...but there ARE bits and pieces which are pretty good.
H.B. Warner plays Carter Mathews, a rich industrialist whose family has been torn apart by gambling. How do we know this? Because Carter tells all his friends at the club all about his family nightmare--starting with his father-in-law and with the gambling bug somehow jumping onto Carter's three sons. Because of the type story it is, the film is quite episodic and all point to the evils of gambling and the virtues of hard work.
Is it any good? Mostly no because the message is obvious and heavyhanded. Plus, with a running time of only about an hour, the film is rushed and unconvincing. Too bad, as Warner and Onslow Stevens are both quite good and there are some very good moments in the film. Worth seeing as a flawed time-passer and not much more.
H.B. Warner plays Carter Mathews, a rich industrialist whose family has been torn apart by gambling. How do we know this? Because Carter tells all his friends at the club all about his family nightmare--starting with his father-in-law and with the gambling bug somehow jumping onto Carter's three sons. Because of the type story it is, the film is quite episodic and all point to the evils of gambling and the virtues of hard work.
Is it any good? Mostly no because the message is obvious and heavyhanded. Plus, with a running time of only about an hour, the film is rushed and unconvincing. Too bad, as Warner and Onslow Stevens are both quite good and there are some very good moments in the film. Worth seeing as a flawed time-passer and not much more.
- planktonrules
- 17 set 2019
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 3 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Born to Gamble (1935) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi