Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaStory of small-town life in turn-of-the-century America, and a young boy's problems facing adolescence.Story of small-town life in turn-of-the-century America, and a young boy's problems facing adolescence.Story of small-town life in turn-of-the-century America, and a young boy's problems facing adolescence.
- Premi
- 3 vittorie totali
Charley Grapewin
- Dave McComber
- (as Charles Grapewin)
Edward J. Nugent
- Wint Selby
- (as Edward Nugent)
Baby Peggy
- Schoolgirl at Graduation
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Harry C. Bradley
- Undetermined Secondary Role - Scenes Deleted
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Tommy Bupp
- Boy with Fireworks
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
A.S. 'Pop' Byron
- Nickolas
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Bruce Cook
- Boy
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis film was the first to have media ads taken out campaigning for an Academy Award. The ads depicted MGMs Leo the Lion holding an Oscar, reading "You've given so much, Leo - now get ready to receive!" Despite the ads (or perhaps because of them) the film received no Academy Award nominations.
- BlooperBelle's mole on her cheek/upper lip disappears halfway through her scene, then reappears later.
- Citazioni
Richard 'Dick' Miller: I'm afraid I was born a hundred years before my time.
Muriel McComber: I was born ten days ahead of mine.
- Curiosità sui creditiThe opening credits appear as though embroidered.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Ribalta di gloria (1942)
- Colonne sonoreLong, Long Ago
(1883) (uncredited)
Music by Thomas Haynes Bayley
Played during the opening credits and often in the score
Recensione in evidenza
MGM apparently had very high hopes for "Ah Wilderness!" when it came to the Oscars and according to IMDB the studio put on a concerted campaign to get it nominated. But, apparently, the Academy voters were just not that impressed by the film and it didn't receive a single nomination. After seeing it, I think I can understand why.
While the basic story is engaging, as you see a family in early 20th century America during a summer, there is a problem with the main focus of the show. It focuses on the second child, Richard. Richard is about 17-18 and is very opinionated and full of himself...much like MANY 17-18 year-olds (trust me...I taught high school!). But Richard goes above and beyond...to the point of being irritating. Yes, he was full of himself...but also came off as an annoying jerk...at least to me. I loved the other characters...but considering most of the focus was on Richard, I just finished the film feeling a bit let down. I frankly expected much more...especially from MGM.
While the basic story is engaging, as you see a family in early 20th century America during a summer, there is a problem with the main focus of the show. It focuses on the second child, Richard. Richard is about 17-18 and is very opinionated and full of himself...much like MANY 17-18 year-olds (trust me...I taught high school!). But Richard goes above and beyond...to the point of being irritating. Yes, he was full of himself...but also came off as an annoying jerk...at least to me. I loved the other characters...but considering most of the focus was on Richard, I just finished the film feeling a bit let down. I frankly expected much more...especially from MGM.
- planktonrules
- 9 dic 2019
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Ah Wilderness!?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 38 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Ah, Wilderness! (1935) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi